Flat earth is propaganda fabricated by the government to discredit true conspiracies and paint those who know the truth as crazy people
>>19551927
Amen.
>>19551927
Fukken truth OP.
>>19551927
When someone crosses the whole continent of Antarctica, then I will believe you.
Finally someone speaks sense.
>>19551927
This 100%. Ive been saying it forever, glad to see (((they))) havent fooled everyone
concave earth is proven tho
>>19551927
FE has people in Congress and the Senate. Kek.
>>19551966
Which is sad.
>>19551969
yea nasa and hollywood was a beautiful dream
>>19551960
We agree with you. It's just business.
>>19551974
And flat earth was an ugly dream
>>19551969
It really is. But hey, the world is 90% dead weight.
>>19551979
your mama
>>19551980
As the world turns. Hey FE, can we reverse it like a record?
>>19551927
This is possible.
>>19551966
Names?
>>19551927
Maybe.
Originally it was trolls and a gateway into more serious matters.
>>19552191
for those who buy a ticket flat earth is a fuckin wild ride, for real
>believing in the physical world
Fucking newfags, I swear to fucking demiurge
>>19551980
That's the most effective way to win an argument, anon. Take some ridiculous argument proffered by someone who obviously has no idea what he's talking about and attach an entire premise and all those arguing that premise to the most ridiculous idea you can find concerning the issue. That'll teach em.
>>19552248
How do I Gnosis into heaven?
>>19551927
What is the truth?
>>19551927
>>19551938
>>19551940
>Samefag
In any case, what are these conspiracies that they're trying to hide? Why lie about the shape of the Earth, and what do they gain from it exactly?
Everytime I ask these questions they either have no answers or they get dodged so riddle me that OP
>>19552264
boi you think you're getting the truth that easily? you gotta put in work until you hit the verge of schizophrenia if you truly want to know
>>19551927
Oh shill you.
>>19551960
>speaks
You have to be at least 18 to post here.
>>19551927
No. It's literal retards being literally retarded.
>>19551980
Right. Because the moon and sun make the eclipses. You should really pay attention while the eclipses occur. There are more "objects" in the sky, one of which covers the sun or moon. What do you think a red "moon" is? Think again, pleb.
>>19552336
This is the most retarded thing I've read all day, thanks.
>>19552397
>he doesn't know about the black sun
>>19551927
But isn't this what every conspiracy theory says about all the other conspiracy theories?
>>19552279
>pic related
Sorry to burst your bubble anon.
>mimi for best lurking method
Not saying it's flat, however something is not right. It may be hollow, or a different scale.
Was Germany just memeing us?
>>19552463
No, they weren't in that thing.
>>19551927
I believe that OP
>>19551927
Tell us the truth so you get more crazy people.
>>19552463
Hitler was into concave earth.
>>19551958
people have been on flights around the world tho
>ITT we realize that flat earth is probably bullshit but hollow earth isn't
>"It turns out that roughly 68% of the universe is dark energy. Dark matter makes up about 27%. The rest - everything on Earth, everything ever observed with all of our instruments, all normal matter - adds up to less than 5% of the universe."
NASA compensates for gravity by claiming the existence of immeasurable, invisible particles. There's not enough visible mass in the universe for gravity to function. Flat earthers claim gravity doesn't exist, or that gravity is a universal "downward" force. I'm no physicist, but neither really seem practical. I'd sooner believe that the planets/stars themselves are the sources of gravity.
My point in this is that concave earth is often considered impractical because according to gravity, and how we believe the earth was formed, it seems impossible. But an intelligent person will eventually comes to the realization that there is a creator of some sort, and the only reason we are adamant the earth is solid is its how we were raised.
>https://youtu.be/rJeFn3LKou4
Aliens probably exist in the earth's center, and that's likely where the bulk of the Nazis ended up.
It's just retards who think because there IS an alternate explanation that alternate explanation MUST be true, completely ignoring the fact that FE requires far more assumptions.
>>19552251
Yeah, probably the most popular model of a flat earth only has one person putting it forward.
>>19552643
>because it's how we were raised
Ever heard of a seismograph?
>>19551927
Your eyes are not to be trusted
>>19552710
>"As you heat a magnet you supply it with more thermal energy, so the individual electron spins (like tiny magnets themselves) become more likely to be in high-energy states, pointing oppositely to their neighbors. That means that they're less lined up so the total magnetism is reduced."
The great hypotheses based on seismographs rely on the idea that the earth's magnetic poles rely on molten magnetic magma.
>"The main evidence for the structure of the Earth comes from studying waves generated during an earthquake...if we have enough seismic stations and the quake is big enough, then we can take all the travel time information and invert it. That means we can obtain a graph that shows the density of rock as a function of depth."
I'm not an expert, clearly, but to me it sounds like we don't have enough information.
We've dug into the earth some 12km, and the estimated radius of the earth is 6371.393km. We've chipped away at .19% of the earth. The other 99.9981165814% is theory based on seismographs, which are only measuring the waves created by earthquakes, which occur at the crust (1% of the earth's estimated size). We are using a wave that originates in our 1% of the planet to estimate the remaining 99%. Anything beyond that 1% is theoretical, arguably more than that.
In addition, we also estimate the total mass of the earth based on other celestial bodies, but what is our constant? Did we put the moon on a scale? The sun? What can one person say about gravity/mass when we can only see 5% of the universe in general?
If we can't find enough matter to account for gravity, and we can't dig even .2% into the earth, there's no possibility of knowing what's beyond the crust.
>>19552546
you mean all over the world desu
>>19552775
Argh. This shit fucked up my vision.
>>19551927
full circle
>>19552812
Also worth clarifying, the 5% I refer to isn't limited to what we've seen in telescopes. No; what I mean to say is that through observing the movement of other galaxies/stars, there isn't enough mass to explain their velocities. And so the idea of dark matter:
>"To hold the elements of the universe together, dark matter must make up approximately 80 percent of its matter."
and dark energy:
>This would only be possible if the universe contained enough energy to overcome gravity"
...are theorized to hold the fragile theory together.
I'm more inclined to believe that because they had to make up all the numbers used to estimate the size and makeup of the universe, things aren't going to be drawn quite to scale, and the estimations will be completely wrong.
>Flat earth is propaganda fabricated by the government
flat earth has no money in it. its considered the worst conspiracy beyond aliens.
but it is true. we are living in an enclosed system with a firnament above.
science proves this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lqeHudoWeqg
The Earth isn't flat.
It's hollow.
>>19552426
Oh boy I was on a shitty browser for phones who the fuck cares?
Way to not answer my question, or anyone for that matter. Thus proving my point.
You all just want to say they're lying for the sake of saying DUH GUHVAMINT IS A LEYED TO U. When it comes to actually proving a point or explaining why they would even lie about the shape of the Earth in the first place everyone just keeps quiet. Pathetic.
>>19552403
>Largest source of light is the color that is devoid of light
Whew lad
>>19552444
>>19553091
the earth isn't hollow. it's normal.
>>19551955
all my this
>>19552823
No, no I literally mean around the world. Like scientifically, demonstrably, measurably around the world.
>>19553381
Keep shilling, the curvature should always be proportional regardless of distance
>>19551927
>Flat earth is propaganda fabricated by the government
Nope,
Flat Earth ideas are Biblical in nature.
>>19553756
Oil is hell juice.
>>19553361
Our money is on hollow Terra anon, so whatever makes you sleep better man
>>19551927
>Flat earth is propaganda fabricated by the government to discredit true conspiracies and paint those who know the truth as crazy people
Actually, the Flat Earth Society has been trolling people on the internet since the 90's. It is a joke organization, created as a joke, because who could possibly believe the Earth was flat?
>>19553726
So his globe is fake?
>>19553756
>less Christians than 1990
>more Flat Earthers than 1990
Uhhhhh
>>19553091
Just neck yourself.
You're even more pathetic than the flattards.
>>19554044
There's nothing funny about being retarded.
what if it like this and we only know one side? or are allowed to and of course the center is hollow.
>>19554044
People unironically believe vaccines cause autism and shit.
Naturally there're retards who believe in a flat Earth.
>>19551927
The fact that people are KNOWINGLY using fisheye lens and spending tons on CGI to procure an artificial curve on the earth speaks volumes.
If the earth has the correct curvature we're told, why give flat earthers any ammo by using a fisheye lens or cgi replica AT ALL??
The easiest way to end this argument is to have a REAL UNEDITED pic of earth!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bns4R5ZsVUw
>>19551927
duh
....even nasa says so
REAL IMAGE OF EARTH, FLATTARDS BTFO LOL
NASA ARTIST ROBERT SIMMON
https://youtu.be/fFBAznZwqVg?t=196
>>19551927
You think FLATEARTH is a psyop? The FUCKING HELIOCENTRIC model is one big pysop.
Check out operation paperclip and find me one real picture of earth (non cgi/fisheye lens).
Timezones make more sense on flat earth
Webcam footage, sun distance seen 3:30
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnzUgKZ8m2k
Pay attention to the lack of curvature shown had extreme height, also see the small and local hotspot below the sun.
IF the sun is 93million miles away and GIGANTIC, why is this hotspot so SMALL???
>>19554554
>>19554554
IF the sun is 93million miles away and GIGANTIC, why is this hotspot so SMALL???
"... Strangely enough theres left in the world today: an area as big as the U.S. thats never been seen by a human being, and thats beyond the pole on the other side of the southpole from middle america - and I think its quite astonishing that there should be an area as big as that unexplored." Admiral Richard Byrd
https://youtu.be/czW0iRJuH1A?t=75
>>19554573
>Why fake the shape of earth??
I suspect is has to do with new land discoveries, possible other lifeforms that have better advancements in technology.
If the earth is a sphere, theres nowhere else to bother exploring. It also creates a one-world religion of scientific explanation.
Considering the earth is flat, it raises a lot of uncomfortable questions, not just about lies but the reality of what we exist on.
Think about it, what if instead of planets, there were just islands to be discovered? There would be new plants, new fungi, new minerals, new food, new creatures, NEW EVERYTHING!!!
>>19554577
This is a scary concept. Modern science is less of a skeptics tool and more of a world religion.
If you try to redefine what others perceive as reality, it incites questions of the unknown which creates fear and contempt.
Its comfy to assume with know everything and that scientists have tackled all the hard questions. Living on a ball rather than an infinite plane greatly reduces those questions.
The accepted curve is 8(miles squared)
or
8in.(distance in miles^2)
Which means to take the square root of the distance traveled in miles and then multiply that figure by eight inches.
So for example, if you traveled one mile, the formula would look something like this;
8(1×1) = 8 Inches of total curvature
And for the first ten miles traveled of curvature in inches…
8(1×1) = 8 Inches of total curvature
8(2×2) = 32 Inches of total curvature
8(3×3) = 72 Inches of total curvature
8(4×4) = 128 Inches of total curvature
8(5×5) = 200 Inches of total curvature
8(6×6) = 288 Inches of total curvature
8(7×7) = 392 Inches of total curvature
8(8×8) = 512 Inches of total curvature
8(9×9) = 648 Inches of total curvature
8(10×10) = 800 Inches of total curvature
Yet we can't measure any curvature AT ALL!!
How can you explain the Midnight Sun?
https://youtu.be/LjvtmzbEgm8
>During Arctic summer, from the 22nd to the 25th of June, at a high enough latitude and altitude, you can watch a phenomenon known as “the Midnight Sun” where the Sun stays continuously visible in the sky for 3 days straight! The “Midnight Sun” rises on the 22nd and for the next 72 hours never disappears from sight, slowly ascending and descending every 12 hours, showing 3 brilliant “sunsets” and “sunrises” without ever actually setting below the horizon. If the Earth were actually a spinning globe revolving around the Sun, the only place such a phenomenon as the Midnight Sun could be observed would be at the poles. Any other vantage point from 89 degrees latitude downwards could never, regardless of any tilt or inclination, see the Sun for 24 hours straight. To see the Sun for an entire revolution on a spinning globe at a point other than the poles, you would have to be looking through miles and miles of land and sea for part of the revolution! Anyone below the 89th parallel could never witness the Sun for 72 hours, 3 whole revolutions, straight because to do so would be to assume you are somehow seeing “through the globe” and to the Sun on the other side! Since such an assumption is ridiculous, and yet the Midnight Sun can clearly be seen as low as the 65 parallel, this is another absolute proof that Earth is the flat, stationary center of the universe.
How many times has the distance of the sun changed?
NASA's astronomical figures always sound perfectly precise, but heliocentrists have historically been notorious for regularly and drastically changing them to suit their various models. For instance, in his time Nicolas Copernicus calculated the Sun’s distance from Earth to be 3,391,200 miles. The next century Johannes Kepler decided it was actually 12,376,800 miles away. Issac Newton once said, “It matters not whether we reckon it 28 or 54 million miles distant for either would do just as well!” How scientific!? Benjamin Martin calculated between 81 and 82 million miles, Thomas Dilworth claimed 93,726,900 miles, John Hind stated positively 95,298,260 miles, Benjamin Gould said more than 96 million miles, and Christian Mayer thought it was more than 104 million! Nowadays they have settled around 93 million for the time-being.
Hidden in plain sight
>>19554533
Nice du33s
Nasa and EESA make billions, yet theres no real pictures of earth. Beyond cgi/fisheye lens (which futher casts doubt)
>>19554554
I'm seeing a mix of flat, curved, and concave.
Video is kinda spooky though, thanks.
>>19552444
>being this retarded
>>19554554
>because the sun is 93 million miles away you mentally handicapped mongoloid
>>19554654
What do you want a picture of earth from the moon? You can't just zoom out and take a full picture of the earth. The reason why they're that close is because satellites need an orbit and if they go to far out they just fall into the void
I try to give you Flat Earthers the benefit of the doubt, but damn are you guys retarded.
Flattards explain this: flight times from (supposedly) one "side" of the earth to the other
Do people actually believe in flat earth or are they just memeing
I want a history channel show where flat earthers try to find the ice walls
>>19555207
No one is allowed to traverse the south pole and publish any kind of real evidence either way.
>>19552403
I wanna know, can you show me?
>>19552463
hollow earth is disinfo so you think that's what is being hidden but you still believe in other planets, space, etc
>>19555300
And yeah, my dubs should make you rethink what you learned in school. Regardless of the right answer is whatever is in your school books isn't right
based flat earth infodump poster
>>19555300
I take it you've tried?
>>19555317
>my arbitray internet post number should let you believe the earth is flat with 0 evidence.
Any flat earther debunk gravity please
>>19551927
Flat earth threads are a highly effective trolling. I don't think it is prominent outside the chans and YouTube. But by even giving it any attention, the troll is fed. Giving it any attention is a sign that you are irritated and have to address it. No one worth a damn 'believes' flat earth. Anyone who does isn't worth anyone's time. I literally support censoring it regardless if it is the fundamental truth. I hope it is the truth and it gets suppressed through force. I wish internet hosting companies would disallow it altogether. I want the flat earthers to disappear outright and entirely. It's not fun to discuss or useful and it takes space and is flat out wrong.
>>19554044
I think OP is talking about the sudden surge of interest in the Flat Earth in 2014.
Before this I remember very well that most conspiracy theories were about Hollow Earth, alien cover-ups, the usual stuff. Then, bam, all of youtube is spammed with Flat Earth shit.
>>19554577
>>19554583
I'm thinking about this as a fantasy setting. Perhaps the "evil" elites have a very good reason to keep the existence of the world beyond a secret. Those outer worlds are populated with hostile lifeforms, extremely advanced civilizations and/or deadly disease, and humans are defenseless against this. Careless explorers could cause a mass extinction by bringing something from those outer world back.
It seems a lot wiser to prevent all contact until humanity is suffice3ntly advanced.
Maybe The Thing was a warning about what dangers that lie beyond Antarctica.
>>19554509
>Insinuating that nature doesn't have predictable patterns it commonly forms, one of the most abundant being fucking clouds
>>19554499
Fish eye lenses are making the field of view wider to capture a bigger picture dickhead. They will distort the image in a way that the Earth will look round or flat or concave depending where you will point the camera. The point of using them is to capture a bigger picture, not to deceive faggots like you.
There is literally no reason for somebody faking the shape of our planet. What these people would gain from that? Help a nigga out and tell me the purpose of that huge lie.
>>19554509
This is a composite of pictures taken by a satellite. We don't have satellites high enough so they could take a picture of the whole earth. It is only natural for the people that stick together these pictures to make mistakes. Especially that they have to work with thousands of huge pictures provided to them. They're only human after all.
Also clouds move if you didn't know that.
>>19554565
That's not a "hotspot" that's a reflection.
>>19554614
Maybe because as time goes are technology and science advances. Because of that we have better tools and ways to measure and calculate the actual distance. I bet in a 50 years the consensus on the distance of the sun to the earth will change for the reason stated above.
There is also the fact that we move on a ellipse, that makes it harder to measure the distance because it constantly changes. I might be wrong so call me out on that but if I recall correctly the Earth moves away from the Sun every year by a few centimeters.
>>19555300
Wrong, you can go on a trip to the south pole. It's expensive (49 750 USD) but at least it might teach you something about the world.
>>19554606
And silence is all we hear from the FE camps. I wonder if their denial is so great they simply pretend as not to have read this and be rattled by the challenge.
>>19554631
Google: what is relativity?
>>19554601
uhhh, we can and have.
>>19551927
shill detected
the earth is flat
>>19555644
>This is a composite of pictures taken by a satellite. We don't have satellites high enough
>pictures taken by a satellite. We don't have satellites high enough
>We don't have satellites high enough
>We don't have satellites
How do satellites not fucking melt in the thermosphere at 1500+ degress??
Where are the REAL pictures of satellites? How come you never see the THOUSANDS in any pictures/footage of earth in orbit?
https://youtu.be/N09ItYiSkj4
>>19554816
>>19555901
Gravity and relativity are theories? Why?
Why are gravity and relativity theories and not proven?
>>19555951
Try again
>>19555897
LOL
This is FROM a FE camp, its proving the earth is flat, try reading and watching the video.
>>19555955
You ask for pictures, then claim fake without proof. Try again
>>19555629
Youre in denial friend, I was there too at one point.
Its all bullshit, you'll figure it out someday. I tried debunking all this flat earth shit and what never made sense is why they would fisheye lens to intentionally create a curve.
>>19555959
The proof is the picture, see >>19555955 again with your eyes open
>>19555459
>>19555575
>>19555545
>>19554840
>>19555058
>>19555058
>>19554693
>>19554680
>>19555445
Gravity was invented to explain how water sticks to a giant ball. Its a theory, just like relativity, for a reason.
Its not proven because its bullshit.
Density is a proven method. If I drop an apple, its not gravity: The apple is denser than oxygen, therefore it falls.
What is gravity? A force? A mythical magic?
>>19555317
>>19555300
>>19555339
>>19555699
>>19554952
>>19555969
no only hollywood is proof
try again
>>19555969
Your proof? Speculation based off a picture that someone tried to place a filter over not even related to the real image?
>>19554712
>>19555969
Also, why no reference to the original image posted?
There are certainly deep caverns filled with remnants of ancient civilizations. Here is Ireland there are Albino humanoids living beneath great mounds hundreds of metres below the ground. They used to kidnap Irish children, which led to the changeling and Daoine sidhe myths. The Irish government was told by the Americans to cover it up. Think white walkers from Game of thrones that's what the Irish mound people look like, no made of ice though obviously.
While Aliens most certainly exist, the creatures underground are just a different form of human, a remnant of a bygone age.
>>19555984
>>19555985
Nasa admits never surpassed Van Allen radiation belt, see 2:50
https://youtu.be/bMfUpqnLFCc?t=171
>>19555988
>>19555985
>>19555984
Why did NASA delete rooms fulls of telemetry data to the moon?
NASA Admits "LOSING" All Moon Landing Data
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnzZyA3JdFk
>>19554816
Its obvious CGI failure from EESA, why is that acceptable?
WHY CGI AT ALL????
ITS JUST GIVING FLATEARTHERS MORE FUCKING AMMO HOLY SHIT
Hey, can you tell me, where do the clouds come from according to this theory? And shouldn't the space be blue? If there is a flat earth, the whole idea of atmosphere is not valid.
Does the space really exist? Or is a flat earth just floating on some water-like liquid?
>>19556004
https://youtu.be/HpBEduGMapw?t=908
EESA (Europeon NASA) fucked up their CGI, see 15:10
>>19555992
At no point is that said, again speculation and drawing conclusions out of full context.
>>19556009
More cute stuff
>>19556013
its at 2:50, please try again
Nasa admits never surpassed Van Allen radiation belt, see 2:50
https://youtu.be/bMfUpqnLFCc?t=171
>>19555999
Nasa publicly admits it can't find most Apollo mission tapes. this is nothing new. To use it to prove anything is pretty amateur.
>>19556015
It's used for measuring velocities and things like that....dumbass.
lol
>>19556032
>>19556029
>>19556013
This is proof the earth is round
https://g.co/kgs/5gR52v
Real footage of earth
>>19556049
Ain't clickin that link fool, make an image or webm
>>19555949
OK, I'll bite.
>How do satellites not fucking melt in the thermosphere at 1500+ degrees??
In the thermosphere the temperature reaches about 1500 degrees Celsius, you are correct on that. What you don't consider is the pressure in that layer of the atmosphere. The thermosphere is a low pressure environment which prevents the satellites from melting or even overheating.
>Where are the REAL pictures of satellites? How come you never see the THOUSANDS in any pictures/footage of earth in orbit?
Probably because they at a similar altitude as the other satellites. Just stand up and look directly at the floor, you won't see the window or the door that are next to you in your room. The same goes for the satellites. Add to that the fact that satellite cameras have a limited view of field.
Also, if I would be the one that makes the full earth pictures, I wouldn't want a satellite to ruin the whole picture. Especially that the satellite would look huge considering their methods of making these pictures.
>>19556056
>>19554554
>>19554565
Not a disc, infinite realm
>>19556063
>>19556062
Disturbing the pretty picture of earth isn't an excuse. We SHOULD see all the satellites just to document what we ACTUALLY EXIST IN!
Theres no reason to lie, we pay NASA 60million dollars... A DAY!
They could end this debate with a simple picture or honest video, but they cant.
>>19556062
Give this video a chance
>>19556079
>>19556062
forgot link
https://youtu.be/N09ItYiSkj4
>3x earth rotations
>1x star rotation with shutter open
Makes sense
>>19554345
>newfag detected
How do i upvote and how do i stop posting as a guest?
>>19556111
New cia recruits?
>>19556072
These pretty pictures are made look the exact reason to look pretty, the're not scientific evidence for the Earths shape.
You don't see satellites pictures because there are no people to take them and there is no purpose to take photos of dead metal boxes in space.
But you have a lot of pictures of the ISS which you can see in this poorly shopped image of yours.
You don't pay NASA to disprove your ridiculous claims. You pay them to do their research and keep these fuckers rich.
>They could end this debate with a simple picture or honest video, but they cant.
They couldn't because people like you will call it FAKE because it doesn't fit your narrative.
Here, have a picture of Earth that isn't a composite.
>>19556116
>there is no purpose to take photos of dead metal boxes in space.
>They couldn't because people like you will call it FAKE because it doesn't fit your narrative.
Its simple, take a fucking real picture --- JUST ONE!
REAL IMAGES OF SATELLITES, FLAT EARTHERS BTFO
>>19556123
Here you go.
>>19556145
cool pic
https://youtu.be/N09ItYiSkj4
>>19556152
You just prove my point.
>>19556145
good, now a complete picture of earth
REAL PIC OF EARTH, FLATEARTHERS BTFO LOL
>>19556160
REAL PIC OF EARTH, FLATEARTHERS BTFO LOL
>>19556157
>>19556145
Why would I buy anything the ISS does??
see
>>19556043
>>19556037
>>19556033
>>19556027
>>19556021
>>19556009
>>19556015
Where are the stars in your (((REAL))) pic???
>>19556127
My big problem with conspiracionists is how poor informed they are and how they rely on images like thar one, they spread it and parroting about it, but without read or check if is true or not:
Thats Armstrong space suit, yes, but the one who left the footprints and take the photos was Aldrin and he wear the an extra protection boots (large overshoes,with treaded soles) since lunar dust/Regolith was supossed to be dificult to gain traction, like snow.
http://www.snopes.com/moon-footprints/
>>19556159
That's a picture from Apollo 17. Not a composite, a full Earth picture.
It wasn't that hard.
>>19556172
Why is it harder to see stars when the moon is full and bright?
>>19556172
>Where are the stars in your (((REAL))) pic???
Go to a city with a lot of lights at night and look at the sky. You won't see the stars.
Look at the fool moon, you won't see the stars around it.
Lmao, you don't know how light works.
>Why would I buy anything the ISS does??
They're more reliable than all these youtube conspiracy theorists.
>>19556172
The highly diluted gas in this layer can reach 2,500 °C (4,530 °F) during the day. Even though the temperature is so high, one would not feel warm in the thermosphere, because it is so near vacuum that there is not enough contact with the few atoms of gas to transfer much heat
fucktard
I would say go to school
>>19556184
Thats my favorite artistic rendition
>>19556202
>best form of argument is to not try prove anything and discount anything that may be proof against my thoughts
>>19555974
Why do objects fall in a vacuum?
>>19556259
this is brilliant
>>19555974
Fuck nugget, Density is a function of mass. Also I can stack materials on top of less dense materials and no 'falling'will happen
Gravity is the attraction of a mass to another mass.
Gravity is essentially proven, what causes it isn't completely know. Just because we don't know what causes it doesn't mean it doesn't exist
And yes, gravity is a force.
>>19556259
Comedy Gold
>>19551927
...et quid est "veritas?"
>>19556274
>gravity is a force
except it isnt. Dont go around smart-assing troll posts if you dont even know what you are talking about
>>19555982
Do you have any idea how incredibly dangerous it is to fly over that much ocean in one flight? Does nobody look at Amelia Earhart and see how awesome she was because she did this, and disappeared because of it? The flight paths look like this because the ocean skies are unpredictable and terrifying, so it's easier to just go around them. We have hundreds of missing planes right now in the Indian Ocean, too.
>>19556088
This was taken at the North Pole, where stars never set. Looking at Polaris, which is the center of this photograph (almost, it's the thicker white circle arc in the center), you can tell the shutter was left open about 8 hours. How? Well, if it was 24 hours, the circles would be complete, thanks to the nature of our rotation. I eyeballed the time off how far it arcs (just past the 1/4 mark, no?). Anybody who's seen and used this picture surely knows enough about it to know what I stated, correct?
>>19552990
I just lurk but I always find this funny.
>science proves this!
>link to YouTube
Kek every time.
>>19553726
> what is composite imagining
Fucking retarded
>>19556504
How does the method they took the picture with have anything to do with the proportions of the content?
Trying to teach you guys something is becoming less and less fun. Fuck you all.
>>19556498
What the hell? On wires or something?
>>19556538
>what is composite imaging
case in point
>>19556117
This is possibly the stupidest FE image I've ever seen. Well done anon
>>19556615
Someone earlier in the thread said the moon dust is hard to gain traction on so my guess is he slipped. A few of the times looked intentional though so he might have just been fucking around in low gravity
>>19553381
I have that same globe lol. The bumps on it are topographical texturing.
>>19556476
>Youtube invalid source of information
You know they have college lectures on youtube right?
Just as with anything, you have to discern whats true. We live in the age of information and misinformation.
>>19556444
see>>19554544
>>19551927
They called us crazy before the flat earth anon.
>>19556111
Oh crap my sides. I don't know what's more funny: This guy making a joke or this guy NOT making a joke.
The earth is a minecraft block and you all know it.
>>19553756
this works better if the world is a sphere. Do (((they))) specifically say it's a disc or is that an after construction?
"Pillars" can be interpreted in 100 different ways, surely they aren't talking about roman marble pillars
>>19551927
It's just a meme taken too far. I wish it would die already.
>>19556101
have you ever looked through a telescope or was this posted ironically?
>>19556159
http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis/online/himawari-8.asp
go wild
>>19556048
the moon is said to orbit the Earth genius
>>19557751
Yes, but conspiracy was much more marketable and interesting back then. I mean look at the X-Files and The Lone Gunmen.
>>19556009
why even wear socks at that point
>>19556015
You can't chroma key two completely different colors.
>>19556831
not a flat earthy at all but that video is weird as fuck because think about it even in low gravity wouldn't physics work the same? As in when he fell shouldn't have bust ass seems at some points he was able to keep his top half up using only his ankle strength?
When I trip and fall I hit hard. Maybe I'm underestimating the gravity difference. I'm not sure but it is a weird video.
>>19555969
holy fuck those are two different pictures combined you fucking mouth breathing retard
>>19559288
>>19554504
So they did some math for tards...
>>19551958
>When someone crosses the whole continent of Antarctica
You fucking /x/ retard it happens all the time, you can pay for trips for it.
>>19551964
kek
How do flat earthers explain how I can dig a hole straight down and when I pop out in China everything will be upside down?
>>19552775
illusion only works because White is Black and Black is White.
White reflects EVERY color. therefore it is none. Nothing, 0 = Nilche or Black as you currently perceive it.
Black absorbs every color therefore it is everything. We are told white is no color and therefore believe this to be nothing while it reflects everything back at us.
Stare at the morning sun(totally safe within 1hr of sunrise) for 30 seconds. You are seeing all of the light reflect off of a black orb. watch it turn dark before your eyes.
>>19559457
Give the link then, faggot
>>19559290
Great
>>19559186
Ever been in a pool?
>>19559457
no anon you can't. Trips to Antarctica are done in small groups and you get taken to one specific ice field for a few days before they helicopter you back to the boat and you sail home.
>>19560845
They take you to the South Pole retard. They even have research facilities at that place.
>>19559715
You are such a moron. Getting serious on /×/.
I mean, seriously, get a life Anon
>>19555953
your GPS on your phone wouldn't be nearly as precise as it is if it weren't for GR/SR correction terms
there are also literally thousands of other experiments...
>>19555953
You should read the definition of "scientific theory".
Clearly you don't know what that means.
>>19561479
>You should read the definition of "scientific theory".
religious theory is better tho, science always changes
>>19554499
i smell a copypasta
>>19554512
they add color to help you visually differentiate the photo you damn goob.
>>19554521
doesnt work if you dont account for earths atmosphere you fucking tard
>>19561493
Yeah, science changes because we learn new things about the world.
>religious theory is better tho, science always changes
That's why even complete idiots consider you guys jokes.
>>19561493
And religion doesn't? There isn't a single religion out there that hasn't been altered, splintered, reformed, and otherwise changed over time.
>>19561504
Islam wasn't. That's why it's shit.
>>19559186
no he weighs less because of the low moon gravity. not completely weightless, but a fraction of what it'd be on earth.
>>19553726
>when you're blind without losing your eyesight
>>19561504
nuh uh
prove it
>>19555575
>>19554577
>hostile lifeforms
>extremely advanced civilizations
>never visited the known part of the earth
I know cancers cells that are smarter than you faglords
LOVE 2 both camps heliocentric and geocentric this info on both sides makes me hungry for truth..
>>19554537
timezones are a man-made concept, which is why time zone sizes are odd shaped, you ruhtard
>>19556117
the sheer pressure of the hundreds of miles of crust weighing on the core keeps it at a perpetual spinning sphere, thus making the magnetism strong as fuck.
>>19555987
what is refracted light
>>19554504
>It's known that locally a flat stationary Earth makes a good approximation
>We have a mathematical model for if aircraft were flying in a flat stationary Earth
>This means we think the Earth is flat
Does anyone else normally browse /sci/ but occasionally come to /x/ for laughs?
i been keeping saying this over and over. why does only this OP get good comments for it?
>>19562295
an excuse
>>19554499
>fish eye lenses prove flat earth when I want them to, but disprove it when I don't
lawdy lawdy y'all niggas brainless
>>19556490
what did he mean by this
>>19551927
Not even gonna read the rest of the thread OP. That's probably the truest, smartest thing on /x/ right now.
>>19562295
>>19562474
>>19562462
Because you are a fag Florian
>>19564148
>>19562437
>>19561499
>>19561251
great arguments
>>19552444
>>19553726
The best part about my image is that it doesn't even state the earth is spherical (although it is)
The figure displays something that would be irrefutable with any spherical object in existence.
Hey flat earthers how do satellites stay up?
>>19564931
I don't know, post a nasa pic that shows the earth surrounded by satellites and maybe we can speculate
>>19564901
>>19564931
>Implying satellites are real
see >>19556136
>>19551927
Neck yourself
>>19555974
Why doesn't it fall up? isn't it more dense the the 'oxygen' above it as well?
>>19564953
We have, you call them artists renditions
>>19564972
What is
>GPS
>Direct TV
>Dish Network
>>19565017
Let's be real, what proof do you have they actually exist? What says that they aren't transmitted either via waves distributed by the atmosphere, or towers that are literally everywhere, or the ground itself?
Have you ever seen a satellite?
>>19565066
no no no explain to me how a gps can locate you?
a Satellite is essentially the perfect way.
>>19565134
>a Satellite is essentially the perfect way.
Yeah if we're talking science fiction
>>19553091
The exact opposite is true. Educate yourself first about flat earth. Watch 200 proofs earth is not a spinning ball. Watch Eric Dubay's videos. Hollow earth has much less proofs than flat earth.
>>19554509
sheeple
>>19567447
What about basic fucking physics dude? What about horizon lines? People who unironically believe in flat earth need to stop using the internet.
>>19567509
I agree with everything you said but because you used that shitty emoji everything you said is invalid
>>19567514
>>19567524
>>19567447
You realize that in physics there is no preferred frame of reference ( hence special relativity ) so you think you're being clever with that image but further thought will tell you from the persons perspective they are on the "top" of the globe with gravity going "down" on every point of from the surface of the globe.
>>19567539
Fak u man. U kno wat ill fite u irl m8. Meet me in the astral plane at 5pm PCT. Be there or be square kiddo
No it's not. Even if the earth isn't flat nasa is still full of shit
fuck off shill
WHERE THE FUCK IS MY POST?
I MADE A POST IN THIS THREAD SAYING "why is it that when i post this, no one cares but when someone else posts this, it gets lots of positive replies?" AND ITS NOT FUCKING THERE
not even in the archive.
there was another thread i checked where i posted yesterday or something and there my post is missing too. but its still the same thread.
whats going on here?
they arent in the archive either.
>>19556091
big if tru
>>19565066
>Have you ever seen a satellite?
They like to photobomb my astrophotography pictures.
>>19551927
I feel terribly sorry for all Flat Earthers. They've clearly never been on a plane or cruiseshio were you can easily see the curvature of the earth...
>>19565066
Yes, I see them almost every night, of its a clear sky ofc
They are not hard to spot
They look like stars just that they move
>>19567447
A hollow earth would make more sens then a flat earth
>>19567598
Yes nasa is full of shit
But the earth is still a globe
>>19552279
Globalist agenda. Simple as that. Your genocide is just a conspiracy theory, here, worry about these "conspiracies" that have zero impact on your life instead and don't ask why the voter has 0 impact on policy
>>19556123
>spend tons of money to dispprove a bunch of people with 0 say on the scientific community
why.jpeg
>>19566821
Yea the moon is still extremely far away, it would never make sense to look like we are right beside the moon, wtf? Obvious.
I notice no one in this thread has properly addressed the question of why the fuck there would be a grand scale, multi-century long conspiracy to keep us from knowing why the Earth is flat but instead to trick us into thinking its round...because reasons.
>But they want to stop us from visiting the other islands in the giant Antartica Valhalla!
You're telling me that a species that, century after century, has fought over even the smallest speck of land for resources looked at these theoretical other places across this supposed ice wall and went 'nah we don't want nothin' to do with that, let's go invade fucking Poland again instead'. For Christ's sake, they're already talking about the possibilities of colonizing Mars. They want to colonize fucking Mars, a place with NO apparent resources that's 54 million km away from us, but these mumbo jumbo ice wall islands? Fuck THAT noise, you guys, that's SCARY.
>>19551927
You fool. Thinking that the flath earth conspiracy is propaganda is actually propaganda told by the government.
If you truly believe all this shit, please, walk off the earth, film it and prove it, by this logic this makes sense
>>19568576
Case closed.
are you sure you don't have amnesia?
>>19569733
Amnesia has been on sale so many times that if they don't have it yet you can fairly safely assume they never will
>>19568644
it's propaganda, inside of a propaganda, inside of a propaganda.
That actually just sounds like schizophrenia with extra steps
>>19567806
>>19565066
You can look at the ISS with a telescope and see its shape.
>>19554533
"What are the stars?" said O'Brien indifferently. "They are bits of fire a few kilometers away. We could reach them if we wanted to. Or we could blot them out. The earth is the center of the universe. The sun and the stars go round it."
Winston made another convulsive movement. This time he did not say anything. O'Brien continued as though answering a spoken objection:
"For certain purposes, of course, that is not true. When we navigate the ocean, or when we predict an eclipse, we often find it convenient to assume that the earth goes round the sun and that the stars are millions upon millions of kilometers away. But what of it? Do you suppose it is beyond us to produce a dual system of astronomy? The stars can be near or distant, according as we need them. Do you suppose our mathematicians are unequal to that? Have you forgotten doublethink?"
1984 eric arthur blair