Hurricane Harvey has got me thinking... what are the possibilities of controlled (and potentially armed) weather? Imagine being able to flood an opposing armies' bases and major cities. How viable would this be in war?
>>19518295
viable enough that the UN has a resolution banning weaponized weather modification.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_Modification_Convention
Remember the Beijing Olympics?
That's how viable it is.
Beijing is a smog-filled shithole but while the Olympics were being held the weather was seriously altered to clean the air.
>>19518317
wow, that's scary. to me its more threatening in ideal than a nuclear bomb. maybe not as damaging, but the ability to control something completely natural like that is one of the purest examples of humanity rising beyond being just an animal. a bit god-like desu.
>>19518295
also it wouldn't necessarily need to be done specifically on a battlefield. It can be an attack causing economic damage in an undeclared war.
>>19518332
yeah, especially if screwing about with the weather system has unforseen long term effects, setting patterns in motion unwittingly that could have consequences for millenia.