Free will is an illusion, wake up.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bz6aY2S4zdY
>>19496343
>declares it impossible to freely choose to act
>demands that you freely choose to act
Without free will, it is as meaningless and physically impossible to ask people to wake up as it is to ask them to stop having mass.
>>19496362
not necessarily, the very act of seeing this could alter ones vector, though it is also true that in itself is destined
>>19496343
The cornfield in front of you is deterministic, the path you choose to take through it, not so much.
At least tell us how you came up with your idea of no free will?
Hello is free will existing for an a.i http://afndisle.doodlekit.com
>>19496408
A ball doesn't choose to bounce off the floor. The fact that a course can be changed through outside influence in no way changes that the person has no will to CHOOSE to wake up.
>>19496416
Causality vs constance. The matrix or despair code, if you will. Consider that at one point of origin, your path through time and space began in a direction and was altered by those also moving through time and space. The subjectivity of your persona is created via context and past experience, which is also action vs reaction. Even if it weren't just chemicals deciding emotion and every past moment creating the current confines of your reality, the place you are in has all been decided by maths and physics. No action can defy the math that has lead you to this point.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6dVBn0CWCQ
>>19496343
thats what losers say. its just an excuse
>>19496428
I'm not stating choice is a valid factor, our choices are already made before the questions are asked. The objective of my influence is to alter direction, I am the same as those without a choice, so how did I wake up?
>>19496437
actually it's a somewhat popular theory among a select few quantum and meta physicists. It's not a matter of abstaining from morality or attrition, but rather the bottom of the rabbit hole.
>>19496444
>The objective of my influence
You clearly didn't wake up, if you still think you have influence or objectives.
>>19496432
That's one believe. Another one would be to believe in the quantum mind and free will.
Sources:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mind
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3470100/
>>19496449
you're not understanding me. I'm aware tat my actions are preordained, butt hat doesn't nullify influence. As far as objectives go the best I can do is not think about my notion so as to go about life without killing myself.
>>19496464
>I'm aware tat my actions are preordained, butt hat doesn't nullify influence.
It absolutely does. There can be no influence if it is preordained. Influence requires that outcomes can be altered.
>the best I can do
There is no best or worst. There is what you will do because that is what is preordained.
>not think about my notion so as to go about life without killing myself.
You will kill yourself if it is preordained. There is no changing this, you have no will to change it. You have no will to start or stop thinking about this.
Tsk, tsk.
You still don't get it OP
>>19496343
Why are you telling us to wake up?
We don't have a choice.
Free will is an illusion.
What we believe isn't up to us.
Just like you.
Unless... Unless free will IS a thing and you're full of SHIT... hey there's a possibility...