What are your thoughts on the conspiracy theory that this and other "rocks" like it, are actually giant tree trunks that are remnants of massive trees from long ago?
pretty fuckin stupid imo. up there with flat earth
>>19475623
not this shit again...
silicon life right?
in4 limestone and errosion
I don't believe it but the idea is still kind of cool. That goes for most things on /x/, though. Everything's all fun and games until someone insists that a theory is actual fact. Then it just gets annoying.
>>19475623
How the fuck is that a CONSPIRACY theory?
Do you memelords ever pause to think before you write?
When the shills get desperate.
>>19475674
I spent a good amount of time against this guy a month of two back
>>19475623
Devil's Tower is igneous, grab some for yourself and get it tested.
>>19475674
The coverup is the conspiracy.
like a gigantic petrified tree? I like it
>>19475691
you're igneous
>>19475623
i know a lot of crazy shit goes down on earth, but to think a tree could even get that big...
>>19475623
>>19476146
Right, or a whole "forest" of them. Downright absurd
>>19475623
My thought is we need a distinction between "conspiracy theory" and "random thought".
conspiracy theory
>Remnant of a Roman empire exists and still has influence.
random thought
>"that tree looks like it has boobs, what if people trees were a thing?"
>>19475623
So we had really big trees once but it's been covered up because...?
>>19476146
You'd be surprised.
33 ton creatures existed how far fetched is it to have gigantic trees?