I know it's a bit of a meme but, has science gone too far?

>No source
kys

File: IMG_0969.jpg (99KB, 700x532px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 700x532px

>>19399394

The a.i.'s """language""" is just fucked up English

It seemed like it was just malfunctioning. Did they have any reason to believe it was actually using an alternate language?

File: columbine two.jpg (17KB, 330x206px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 330x206px

>>19399594
No, it's fake news to make them look like they have the power to create a dangerous A.I. but won't because they are good guys.

apple III you you
translates to i need the apple more than you.

they're seeing if ai can do fair bartering

it's a nothing burger

they made a cam tracker that can see unusual activity. that plus gun equals 15yrs

>>19399404
fucking google it you impractical sack of shit

>>19399570
I think engineers would be able to discern if it was a glitch or not

>>19400425
It's not a given that anything posted on this board is actually Googlable. Asking for a source on what presents itself as a new article isn't wrong.

To answer the spirit of the original post rather than arguing about the letter, AI is an inevitability. The only scenarios in which we don't create thinking computers are the ones where we blow ourselves back into the Stone Age or eat the planet alive before we get the chance to develop it. Musk and Hawking and Asimov can all bitch their faces off but we CAN do it so we're GOING to do it whether or not we should.

>>19400445
>>19400425
http://bgr.com/2017/07/31/facebook-ai-shutdown-language/