Can I appear to my younger self and give him(me) advice, trough

File: IMG_0120 - Copy.png (524KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

524KB, 600x800px

No.

>>19394473
Was your past self open to such things?

>>19394473
of course its possible. but it would be you from a different timeline, so nothing that you tell yourself would actually change anything when u wake up

>>19394486
I saw it in cartoons so I actually awaited to meet my future self and that I would give myself advice.

>travel back to my past self
Well, if you could move every particle in the entire universe back to where it was when you were young and reverse entropy, maybe.

Time isn't some sort of obscure stream that information or people can be sent to or from, it is the physical workings of the universe.

>>19394516
What if the physical workings of the universe are some sort of obscure stream that information or people can be sent to or from?

File: images(2).png (43KB, 459x668px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 459x668px

Doubling Theory

>>19394513
Oh, so you're already prepared for it. I was going to ask if you wanted me to modify your personal timeline such that your past self would be open to it.

Yes, yes it is entirely possible.

But if you know it's you, won't you just end up not making this thread? In other words, did an entity that didn't identify itself as you show up instead?

>>19394540
Then every piece of scientific literature written within the last 100 or so years is completely 100% wrong.

File: pom.jpg (30KB, 852x460px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 852x460px

>>19394552
This is my opinion

so i go back in time
>tell myself
>just drop out of highschool and start working on that GED, and those prerequisites at community college
>get into nursing or electrical engineering
>don't go out with friend for "dozen shot-gun drinking
>dont fuck that co worker, dont even look at her in any meaningful way, she was just looking for an easy lover
>work on that career
>perhaps mother wont become a raging alcoholic but in the inevitably she still is, save all the money i can to pay off her mortgage and inherit the house
>

>>19394549
>Doubling Theory
?????????

>>19394567
Then you'd only be changing your memories. The version of you that posted this thread would still be here, I would still respond the way I did, and you would still be told that you were only changing your memories. How is that different from you just imagining contacting yourself and benefiting from the resulting emotional state?

>>19394595
I want to have my current memory and be a child again.
I'll be considered a genius child prodigy even trough im not, and it will be very funny .

>>19394602
>it will be very funny
Take it from a time traveler that it's not.

Yes, you can transport your consciousness into your past body, but it's not something I'll help you with. Contacting, sure. Visiting? Absolutely. Just not replacing. That's something you should only do on your own, if you are so inclined.

>>19394473
If you didn't already meet your older self and have the conversation you would have, you're not going to do it.

>>19394473
if you were going to do that you would already have knowledge of it from the time you were visited by yourself.

>>19394473
Sorry anon. Time is relative, it can be streched or compressed, you can move faster forward....but it is impossible to go back in time. That delusion comes from modern fiction. If you look into ancient myths around the world, time travel does not exist...that means that not only science, but spiritualism and magic deny such a thing as travel to the past or speak to the past.

Sorry my english sucks

>>19395071
Ancient yogis would remote view back in time and contact (supposedly) spiritual masters and sages of the past.

nice grandfather paradox youd be causing

>>19395146
Sorry, my knowledge of yoga traditions is very limited. Maybe they contacted them in some spiritual realm, rather than in the material world...

I am really interested in the matter, could you suggest me some readings?

>>19394556
you know which board you are on, right anon?
mainstream science is about as reliable as mainstream media.
coincidentally, they are funded by the same people.
Care to take a red pill?