If succubi are demons ("fallen angels") intended for dirty sex ("physical love"), what is angel counterpart for pure spiritual love and how to summon one?
There isn't one.
Angels wouldn't fuck a human, they're arrogant racists.
>>19335436
>fuck
Did you even read OP's post?
>>19335449
Same thing.
They wouldn't love you, to them you're just a talking ape way beneath them.
>>19335426
consciousness
>>19335436
>>19335463
Sounds like you are demon worshiper.
>>19335426
They all do the spiritual love thing.
>>19335436
>who were the Watchers
>what is the Book of Enoch
>>19335525
I don't worship anyone.
>>19335426
You can't. A being comprised of pure love is a step above the need for physical lovemaking. They don't have junk. Just being near them would give you overwhelming ecstasy tho.
>>19335426
Sex is not love, it is lust.
Love is blind, literally. True unconditional love is like nothing you could ever experience during sex.
Remove the conception that you need any being to give you anything, be it love or lust or sex or "spiritual love".
All you need is within. Do not look to the outside, or to the spirit realm, for you will be deceived. I tell you this only out of love, genuine pure love for your highest well-being and self-interest.
>pure spiritual love
Angels are shit at love. They just have a justice hard-on and judge and smite and feel self-righteous.
If you want PURE, pray to a maiden goddess. If they like you, then you have a friend on the other side and they can send you some love when you commune with them.
>>19335436
This.
At least if you summon a demon, they'll humor you. But once you try to invoke an Angel, they will judge your heart and if there's even a slight of 'sin', they will destroy you. You will feel like you murdered someone.
>>19335436
Dirty subhuman nigger detected.
>>19335901
>>19335426
First, most demons are not fallen angels.
Second, succubi and incubi are not "intended for dirty sex" (where the heck did this come from?)
And finally, if you knew what spiritual love meant, you wouldn't need to ask.
So the answer is:
Lurk moar
>>19335694
How? Please be specific.
>>19335436
kys nu-male
You have to actually be in love with them and it's nothing like physical human sex.
Also if you're not being 110% genuine in what you're feeling they can and will leave you high and dry. Fetishes aren't going to work. Fantasies aren't going to happen. You have to be completely in the moment, aware of yourself but focused on them.
>>19335908
got em, bash the ebil nazi
>>19335908
Kill all liberals
>>19335426
Some members of the interstellar community can be accurately described as angelic, clean, wholesome, honest.
You do you know what a hybrid race is, right?
>>19337097
>Liberalism first became a distinct political movement during the Age of Enlightenment, when it became popular among philosophers and economists in the Western world. Liberalism rejected the prevailing social and political norms of hereditary privilege, state religion, absolute monarchy, and the Divine Right of Kings
>This is a bad thing
>>19337177
Yes, it is a bad thing.
>>19335436
careful with that edge boy
>>19337177
Liberalism inverted when it attached itself the political left. Liberal philosophy is supposed to hold individual freedom and responsibility in high regard. Leftism is about controling society to create the 'perfect' utopia.
They are mutually exclusive, but thanks to leftism's use of double-speak, they are often understand as being synonymous.