Anyone with experience in sigilization, spell-casting, and/o

>>19328739
>In this way, by accident or design, "He will Not Divide Us," amounts to a spell/mantra which would ensure that Trump would do just that!

How the fuck did you come to this conclusion?

>>19328750
not OP, but the general idea, is that the subconscious doesn't register 'negative' wrods like not, or stop, in mantras or sigils.

So if you made a mantra/sigil that said I will not eat cookies, it won't work because your subcoinscious won't pick up the not very well. You should change it something with positive words like "I will eat healthier"

>>19328756
OP is basicallt saying that "He will not divide us" translates into the subconscious as "He will divide us" because of what I wrote.

A better slogan might have been "We will stand united" or something to that effect

>>19328756
>not OP, but the general idea, is that the subconscious doesn't register 'negative' wrods like not, or stop, in mantras or sigils

Would love to see some evidence for this statement

File: 1500076522664.jpg (78KB, 592x744px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 592x744px

>>19328756
>>19328763
I am OP, and you are spot on.

Practitioners know this-- never use negation.

File: 1500392221792.gif (353KB, 347x251px) Image search: [Google]

353KB, 347x251px

>>19328739
blood clot

>>19328805
This is also one of the first things I learned. I doubt shia leboeuf is relevant enough to cause potential world-class change though.

>>19328764
I would love to see evidence for THIS statement:
>Also, it is well understood that mentally unstable individuals tend to have much more potency/efficacy when spell-casting.

>>19328739
The only reason anyone tries to say that he won't divide us is because they realize that he has that potential saying he won't doesn't change the fact that he can. No such sigil would override his own ability to enact his decisions, meaning that such a ritual, such a stance, such a slogan, only qualifies as false hope. "Can't" is never true.