Is it morally acceptable to have keep a pet to transfer my malicious

>>19324093
You already know the answer. You just want to bait the dog lovers on this board.

File: 123456987456321456987456321458953.jpg (948KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

948KB, 1000x667px

>>19324093

If you believe in that, i think you can transfer them onto trees by touching them.

It is called " tree hugging "

>>19324111
Time stamp plus ones killed the thread

>>19324093
How does that even work?
Do you just angrily/sadly look at them and run through your most deprived thoughts?
How old was your last pupper when it died?
You don't deserve your puppers, kill yourself.

>>19324093
no, even if it does not work, dogs sense negative energy and will become unhappy and anxious, if their owner is.

>>19324093

You are a flat Earth dude, aren't you?

Guess what. You cannot transfer thoughts and depression. You just make any creature with empathy feel it with you, if it cares enough about you. But you cannot give it away. Just go to doc and ask for pills.

>>19324093
its about as morally acceptable as you believe it is. your life, your morals.
In saying that, if your willing to do it to one animal why not another? humans are just animals, is it morally acceptable to do so to a human.

What morals are we basing this from? Mine or yours
Troll face.jpg

>>19324093
No it's not you piece of shit.