sup /x/, I was wondering, what do you luminatis, sacred geo,

>>19304886
I bet they're gonna call you a faggot.

>>19304886
>it's a black hole
how do you know what something cute can be or even look like is after having one of these things run your ship aground in the instanton

>>19304886
faggots

File: tmp_1484-1478495417612(3)2095965774.jpg (21KB, 290x400px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 290x400px

>>19304886
Theories on dark matter are an embarrassment to scientists everywhere.

>>19304886
>>19304905
Totally wasn't me... BUT... called it.

>>19304917
there are different sides in physics as well, just like in the esoteric, ancient knowledge peeps.

>>19304905
op is always faggot..so touche'...?
>>19304900
lol, how can you tell you are putting your feet in slippers when its completely dark at night in your room if you can't see them?

I personally believe a lot of these groups and books from ancient times were speaking of technology, and that view seems to be growing more and more in a hush hush type of way in the science scene.

File: tmp_18874-1474434575605_2_2_2118179879.png (184KB, 410x417px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 410x417px

>>19304940
The different sides could use some new branding, in my IMO opinion. Maybe something like NEW Modern Science, or Science v2.0! Where instead of assuming data to confirm theories, the new modern scientist v2.0 considers each possible explanation for observed data, and devises experiments which then test those possible explanations by allowing data from new sources to observed in those experiments. (Is that literally Bayesian Statistics?)

This is a revolutionary new approach to the theory of knowledge that I read about in an ancient book, detailing the scientific method, as it was practiced hundreds of years ago.

Let me know if you want my help with name branding, so that you don't get thrown-in with those goof offs who go around figuring out where dark matter WOULD be, assuming that it is there, or bogged down with legalities like those poor gents at Skunkworks, who haven't seen the light of day in decades because the projects they're working on don't technically exist in the universe that they're supposed to claim that they're from.

File: titan1.jpg (484KB, 752x950px) Image search: [Google]

484KB, 752x950px

>>19304940

>>19305167
good point about testing all explanations, i think a lot of physicists are more open to this than other disciplines, maybe that's why I have seen a sort of underground resurgence of reading old scripts by colleagues.

>>19304886
Thanks for helping The Elites push their agendas, you fucking pleb.