Thread replies: 7
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: Moon(DBZ).png (110KB, 640x480px) Image search:
[Google]
110KB, 640x480px
The Moon
New Conspiracy Theory
The moon was a weapon, artificially placed into orbit, to destroy a great enemy.
The moon is the closest thing we have to a Halo installation.
Why? It's likely hollow or at minimum has deep open pockets.
We can not explain it's origin through standard orbit models.
Many ancient peoples have legends of two races fighting in the sky.
The moon, if scaled back using current orbital theories, would have killed and destroyed everything in the lower and upper atmospheres. Creatures on the planet, and subterranean organisms may have survived this still, or at least the building blocks of life would have maintained.
I theorize the moon has oil on it, from dead creatures of Earth past.
If we drill on the moon, in a place where these oils and dead organisms would have collected...
The side wall of the moon facing towards Earth, I imagine we could drill maybe 2 miles deep, and we would hit large pockets of hydrocarbons, backing this theory.
One day, may I be proven wrong.
One day, may I be proven right.
I do not care about the status of my own opinion, I want to know the truth.
I can not know, if we do not look.
>>
>>19212874
Nigga you high
>>
>>19212880
It's only a small leap beyond the idea that the Chicxulub asteroid would have put organisms from Earth on to Mars.
(Bare minimum, the chicxulub impact had enough energy to put a piece of Earth the size of Alaska into escape orbit from Earth.)
Remember, Martian meteorites hit Earth every few hundred years. Mars probably took more impacts from Earth meteorites after the chicxulub event that put those to shame.
I'd imagine we should find fossilized remains of plant matter on Mars at bare minimum.
>>
>>19212874
I'm not sure about everything else but confirmed hollow when either a probe or lander crashed on the surface and it "rung" for hours as if it was hollow.
>>
>>19212874
they used oil diggers in Armageddon on that meteor, it's very possible to do it on the moon. Movies are always right.
>>
>>19212874
That's no moon, that's a space station
>>
>>19212944
You're completely wrong. They did smash a probe into the surface. They did measure the vibrations. It was different than the vibrations a similar impact would have on earth.
It was not hollow. The difference was due to an absence of ground water.
Thread posts: 7
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1