Why did the thread get deleted? Also does anyone have the infograph

Because it's coming for you and they don't want you to know.

File: smoking2.jpg (33KB, 1280x718px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 1280x718px

>>19183267
Because its a psy-ops.

File: 1490233348465.png (253KB, 1902x895px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 1902x895px

>>19183273
What's coming?
Saturn?
In it's normative position?

>>19183267
>full gestalt

>nasa launches an IR satellite (IRAS) in 1983
>takes multiple infrared exposures of a wide field of view
>the areas saturn and other planets are overexposed and distorted due to proximity
>saturn in particular appears twice in the imagery because that area was scanned twice where it had moved significantly
>nasa puts the data in the IRAS
>the data is later refined into IRIS
>distortions are corrected in IRIS and certain areas are trashed as unsalvageable (the area around saturn, for instance)
>google later adds the IRIS dataset to their sky view
>parts are missing as NASA had trashed areas around overexposed planets and comet tails
>30+ years later, /x/ catches wind
>/x/ assumes google is hiding something
>/x/ weaves a complex conspiracy theory about a cover-up even though any real cover-up wouldn't have a giant "CONTENT REMOVED" flag painted over it
>/x/tards, underage nu/pol/, and LARP faggots shit up /pol/

that's the quick rundown.

sources:
https://skyview.gsfc.nasa.gov/blog/index.php/2016/05/11/757/
http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/IRASdocs/issa.exp.sup/ch3/C.html#tab3

>>19183267
These threads are being made literally every single fucking day since 3 months ago or something, no one is deleting them

>>19183267
That looks like a Cacodemon's retarded cousin

>>19183267
As if they would go to lengths to cover this up, but forget to conceal it on googlesky in the first place.

File: IMG_0068.jpg (1MB, 1160x6760px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1160x6760px

Wake me up when September ends, I feel it in my bone it's enough to make my system groan welcome to the new age

>>19183467
>>19183280

File: Screenshot_2017-06-21-13-12-10.jpg (1007KB, 1532x2451px) Image search: [Google]

1007KB, 1532x2451px

>>19183267
I saw this was posted in the thread maybe it's relevant?

>>19183280
>>19183267

I don't know which is odder, the fact this thread gets made daily or the fact the reply is made each thread.

File: 9 47 54, 13 16 38.5.jpg (14KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 300x300px

Heres a view of that object using a different lens.
btw: good job remy :^)