The Earth is: Flat Round Bigger as told inner earth shadow govermant

>>19145502
Oh wow. the whole "wake up sheeple" narrative. I love how people like this never consider that they were bullshitted and dont think things through. But at the same time I understand it is almost the whole appeal of those ""theories"" to feel like you found out about a huge mystery that the rest of humanity is too dumb/weak to discover. No you are almost alone fighting all the evil forces in the world (le gubbermint, le shillz!)! Totally not a shizo. Good show, better grab that tin-foil hat!

>>19145517
>""theories"" to feel like you found out about a huge mystery
there is a problem right here with this sentences. A theorie is just a theorie, you can deny it or discuss it but never act as if it was a fact. But these days people seems to handle theories as fact and start to build another theorie based on theories what brings us to a state of absolutly bullshittery.

It is just a theorie, there should be no problem discussing things like this. But than again, there are people who feel ofended by that theorie and deny it based on their own beliefs, fucking up the whole conversation (muh faltards, muh ball earthers)

I have to say, i hate the flattards because they act as if their theorie would be the only true theorie and so they kill any other options, any other theorie. The same goes for the ball earthers. There seems no room at all, to just discuss theories as such.

>>19145538
There is a fuckhuge difference between a scientific theory and how the word is used in every day language or in flat earth "theory" or conspiracy "theories". In the (wrong) every day usage of the word it pretty much just mean "some stuff I made up/thought about", in the scientific definition it is pretty much the closest we can get to an objective fact.

But yeah, I agree, there is never a discussion with this topic. It is always just "lol u retarded" against "fuck off with your cgi, le shill!". Intellectual dead-end

>>19145561
>scientific
true but what is when the scientist is not discussing things at all? Then there are almost no theories at all and people have to make their own.

so basicly, the lay lines, no scientist would ever go down that road because of the fear to get ridiculed in the sociaty. Full stop there. Before even a theorie is builded it get dissmised forhanded. Based on the belifes of other theories.

Same with UFO's, ayy's, chemtrails, and so on.

>>19145583
Yeah, or they have good reasons to not look further into stuff like laylines and chem-trails. If there is no data, no measurable effect and no way to confirm/falsify, there isnt really anything they can do. Its up to forumfags like us to fantasize about this sort of stuff.
But I think you are wrong about ayys. A lot of program have the sole purpose to find out about ayys

The earth is a Zoo and we are the dumm stupid apes...

>>19145613
apes do what they want, dringing their own pee and stuff like that. Humans not......

>>19145626
speak for yourself

>>19145626
Are you sure?many human drinking pee...

>>19145626
Wowe............... interedasting....................

>>19145626
Bit thats Not the Theme here!!!!

>>19145627
>>19145630
>>19145632
>>19145634
wat de heck?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDi1fjVBNdw

File: Character+art+season+2+landscapes.jpg (177KB, 722x1106px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 722x1106px

>>19145502
>Bigger as told

I've never heard of this one, whats the story with that?