Hey /x/ I've been thinking what if we're living in

>>19138569
>Hey /x/ I've been thinking what if we're living in a Computer simulation like some believe?
read this, if you want to better understand this concept of reality being a computer simulation https://www.amazon.com/Programming-Universe-Quantum-Computer-Scientist-ebook/dp/B000GCFBP6/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1497234365&sr=1-1&keywords=programming+the+universe

>Let's say outside our bubble their is a life form controlling what happens to us say their is an advanced form that created us and we are a video game for them.
odds are, they would literally be so advanced—compared to us and everything we're capable of imagining—that we are incapable of imagining them; this is based on the relationship between humans and human-written (software) simulations

>>19138569
serious recommendation: If it is a simulation it is non-physical mathematics and thus malleable in some respects.

Look into the Flat Earth, another possible architecture of the universe.

If you think it's fake, why not flat and fake?

>>19138569
These are literally being created by hundreds of corporate and research organizations right now. Anyone who uses the argument that it's impossible or the resources would be unavailable is ignorant or lying.

>>19138632
>Look into the Flat Earth, another possible architecture of the universe.
don't listen to this idiot

>>19138569
Sadly the only being possible living beside us are to small or big to see. They also could be in a different dimension or differention or parallel universes and don't get me started in parallel dimensions our minds cannon fathom this shit

>>19138709

It's cool man, it isn't for everyone.

We all have our needs.