America claimed they went to the moon almost 50 years ago, filmed

kuz it's maid of fukkin cheez lol

The cost to send supplies up there would be super fucking expensive

>>18924865
They want to do it the cheap way:
>Space Elevator

>>18924865
"We don't": so that other countries don't suspect that we have some sekret bases up there.

>>18924865
because they give NASA about 1/50th the budget it had during the '60s since it no longer a competition with the Commies and nobody else gives a shit about rocks

>>18924916
I like rocks.

Always wanted to have a moon rock.

>>18924928
Do you know they're radioactive right?

>>18924865
The dust kills you.
radiation, non inhabitable

>>18924865
There are claims we went to the Challenger Deep almost 60 years ago, followed by both manned and unmanned visits. Why haven't we set up a base up there? If we want to explore more of the depths, what better way than another launch point on the ocean floor (exclamation point!) (question mark?)

>>18925025
>>18924865
The real reason is the Nazis already had bases in both places. Antarctica too.

>>18924865
[spoiler]its because they are afraid of the aliens. the aliens were keeping an eye on us like tourists keep watching animals in a zoo. when apollo 11 stepped out to the moon, they saw beings on the horizon looking at them. they were spooked. everyone at nasa was spooked.[/spoiler]

>>18924865
>If America could go there that easily 50 years ago, why haven't we set up a base up there?
First explain your logic here. Just because we already stopped doing manned mission there a long time ago, means we MUST have a base there now that we barely would use at this time? what? wihsful thinking much?

>>18924865
Because it's a waste of money.

Why doesn't Robert Ballard go to the Titanic every year?

>>18924865
>launch point on the moon
This is dumber than you could possibly know. The ISS is a better, more realistic, and economically reasonable launch point. But the Earth is still 1000000x cheaper to launch from, because we don't have to have a launch vehicle to transport material for a launch vehicle.

There is no rocket fuel, polymer producers, or metal foundries on the moon.

>>18924865
Can't decide if you're a troll or just really fucking retarded. Have you any idea how much it costs to lift a single kilogram into orbit - never mind getting it to the Moon? Try leaving your basement Fatty McFat-Face and educating yourself.

>>18924865
every 4 to 8 years the US changes most/all of it's goals.
it takes ~10 years to plan and set up a space project.
therefore, NASA can only complete those projects that are not significant enough for the higher ups to notice/care about.
the only reason we got to the moon was because JFK got shot after making a big speech about going to the moon.
none of the subsequent presidents could cancel JFK's project without seeming like villains who were disrespecting a fallen hero.

we managed the International Space Station because the other governments involved are more stable and forced us not to quit in the middle.

in short, the government cant get shit done unless forced.

File: IMG_4020.jpg (34KB, 341x256px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 341x256px

>>18926561

In 1969 we were able to broadcast the landing live and get there with no problems. Well, every aspect of technology has improved many times over since 1969. Naturally it should be far easier to get there 50 years later.

you can't get to the moon, there's a dome surrounded us (the upper limit of our atmosphere), above that is the first heaven (a super fluid) then above that is the firmanent which is what the sun and moon are projected from

>you silly niggers, if you don't know that go to /sci/ and roleplay that we evolved from monkeys, that there was a big bang that made nothing into our universe and that we live on a fucking ball and everything travels at ludicrous speeds

>>18926872
lunar rock is 0.1% water by mass.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_water
that may not seem like a lot, but the moon has a lot of rock.

2 H2O -> 2 H2 + O2
when cooled to liquid state, that is rocket fuel.

moreover, ~95% of the mass of rockets launched from the earth is used in getting past the atmosphere and into orbit.
the moon has no atmosphere to get in the way and is significantly smaller.
it is possible to reach lunar escape velocity with a ground based railgun.
so, you can get as much fuel as needed on the moon, AND launch is essentially free after infrastructure is built.

the optimal rocket construction procedure:
build it in orbit.
use materials + fuel from the moon.
send up from earth only what you cant get elsewhere in sufficient quantities. (mainly just people and plants/animals for farming)

>>18927684
>Naturally it should be far easier to get there 50 years later.
Well, the sheer effiency of heavy lifting rockets didnt get that much better. In fact. we currently have no avialable/usable alternative to the SaturnV which would come close to its power.
Other than that. there is barely a really good reason to revisit the moon with a manned mission. Keep in mind that the "race to space" was mainly motivated by the cold war and similar international tensions.
So yeah, we COULD do it, but if anything people are going to focus on mars right now.

>>18924865
Lmao we spend our money on welfare of all kinds op

File: 1427642553707.jpg (41KB, 402x402px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 402x402px

>>18924884
>>18924899
>>18924916
>>18926561
>>18926793
>>18926872
>>18927001
>>18927642
>>18927708
OP those posts are shills don't listen to them. The real reason We can't go back There, is beacuse We are not allowed by ((them))

File: Sternfrucht.jpg (91KB, 843x596px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 843x596px

>>18928303
this a sad and pathetic attempt at trolling. git gud

>>18924881
FPBP

>>18924865
Bro if they set up an oxygen field and it fails, then the people up there are dead. The moon also has to be in a certain position for the launch to take place, and our rockets are not exactly that efficient. Needless to say, it would cost trillions of dollars just to finance everything.

>why haven't we set up a base

Because there's no point and it's too expensive. Retard.

>>18927712
>let's just extract the 0.1%water from mom rocks and break that into enough hydrogen and oxygen to fuel rockets! That won't require any energy at all!
I think you may have solved earth's energy problem too, Genius.

>>18928396
Define point

>>18928628
Not him, but what are the benefits? Desribe how we can profit from such an endavour like you was a space program begging for funds

Hollywood already threw out all the props but we could set up a base in the warehouse they used I guess

(Not a flat earther just trying to catch sum WRYYYYs)

Think of how much our technology has advanced in these 50 years, if we built that shit 50 years ago it would be so far deprecated we'd have to entirely rebuild to have something good.

We currently have no actual plans (Aspirations, certainly, but no planned, funded, etc. missions) to go any where else.

So why the fuck would we build something we don't need just yet? Think of how much farther ahead we'll be, technologically, in 50 years, let's say we decide we want to start establishing settlements on Mars 100 years from now, then there would be serious merit in establishing settlements on the moon, but until we actually have somewhere else we want to go, we have no reason to build a base that will simply be outdated by the time we use it.

>>18924865
>why haven't we set up a base up there?

Because an asteroid would smash into it, and destroy it. We have a long lasting space station in orbit. Why do we need a second one that will get smashed?

>>18924958
what are their active isotopes then? and why are we not using them as a fuel for some sort of lunar reactor?

We? WE Set up a Base?

>>18928303
I really hope this is bait.

>made it through van allens belt 50 years ago
>made it through van allens belt
>not landing on the moon with a tin can full of fried human

File: 2D968905-98C7-43B5-9DAE-1FB27DE9BAE9-6600-000004C44DBC12CB_tmp.jpg (211KB, 1218x1452px) Image search: [Google]

211KB, 1218x1452px

NASA murdered Gus Grissom because he knew the apollo mission was bullshit.

File: B25BCD67-2482-4F0F-B382-3259472926CC-6600-000004C50EF90357_tmp.jpg (14KB, 352x270px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 352x270px

>>18928980

File: 7A4A2E2F-9C07-4CD9-BFA5-D292EAFFF529-6600-000004C572A8A7EB_tmp.jpg (121KB, 2000x1272px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 2000x1272px

>>18928984

File: 1422134210895.jpg (98KB, 506x566px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 506x566px

>>18928990

Never been to the moon, cant go there because earth is f

>>18924865
no budget explains why NASA has never gone back to the moon
but what about Russia, communism doesn't need money. Maybe they are just leaving it for China

Red Moon

>>18928882
who said we arent? nobody knows.

>>18924884
>economy has more than quadripled since 50years ago
>science has improved a trillion times since then
>expensive
what?

>>18927708
Go fuck yourself you flattard christfag retard 40iq. Go back to bible thumping and fucking your cousin you inbred backwaters piece of shit.

>>18924865
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_soil#Harmful_effects_of_lunar_dust

>>18925033
Chek em

All you plebians posting your dumb theories about the cost can shutup now that im here. I dont ever post on this board so enjoy this knowlege bomb while you can..... We went to the moon and guess what we found.

ITS A FUCKING ARTIFICIAL OBJECT USED AS A BASE IN OUR SOLAR SYSTEM BY VARIOUS SPECIES

It has been divided into sections and is regarded as a neutral zone where the species lay aside their differences and have a peace agreement to prevent their previous mistakes.

We (the nazis) built a base up there in the 60's as you will soon find out in the years to come.

If you dont believe me just ask yourself why it never rotates like every other object in the solar system

>>18932536
its actually a death star, as is one of Saturn moons

>>18932536
Interdasting. And where did you get this info from

>>18931916
i know, because we couldnt get there 50 years ago.
van allens belt would have cooked the shit out of the shuttle

>>18930096
The earth is flat and space doesn't exist. Just say the truth.

>>18932081
September 23rd you'll learn or God is not real (He is)

>>18932567
An insider who worked off planet for over 20 years

>>18932586

Please don't attempt to pervert God (additionally the September 23rd date) with the Flat Earth theory.

>>18932536

The mathematical formula for the "tidal locking" just makes your post seem more plausible.

>>18932608
Did not god say the foundations of earth were fixed? Did he not say through isaiah that earth is a circle, one suitable to be a footstool to God?

>>18932615
This effect is employed to stabilize some artificial satellites. (which is basically what the moon is)

>>18932620
>Did not god say the foundations of earth were fixed?
Nah.
>Did he not say through isaiah that earth is a circle, one suitable to be a footstool to God?
That was just Isaiah talking.

>>18924884
Nigga, just tie a rope to two poleys or something between Earth and the CURIOSLY static never changing face of the moon and then you can just pull the rope and BAM, free shit for you from Earth to the Moon.

Of course nobody does this because the moon isn't real.

>>18926793
No it is not you filthy dirt ape. Move upwards with your fucking mind. It might be considered a "waste" by the Powers-That-Be, but a true waste? Are you SURE it's a waste of crystallized time? That's all Money is, after all.

>>18927708
I wish I could spit on you.

>>18924881
zozzle

we were warned to GTFO and not visit too often.

>>18932646
B L U E P I L L E D

File: tmp_23290-1492399686783-1847106978.jpg (82KB, 780x569px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 780x569px

>>18932536
Heil Hitler!

>>18924865
Its because we dont have the technology to terraform the moon, And because of the lack of gravity in space, the human body suffers and our muscules get weaker, as well as our spine elongating.

>>18932586
>>18932608
Gtfo you fucking autist christfags. Hope you realise how fucking retarded you and your fake bs religion are. Suck yhvh's dick more you worthless cucks.

>>18924865
>>>18932567
>An insider who worked off planet for over 20 years
You mean corey goode? Trying to make it seem like he told you firsthand? Say his name you dumb fuck. Stop trying to be mysterious and edgy.

>>18932932
>>18932596
Ups wrong reply

>>18932877
>the lack of gravity in space
that statement hurts to read.

>>18932536
Agreed. But not sure about the nazis though..

>>18924865


there is pretty damn good evidence that aliens have a base on the moon. We most likely have a base there also.

They won't tell us about the base because it would be harder to contain the E.T secret.
heres some evidence:
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xg_bkYTC_zo

>>18932922
He can't C O P E

>>18933060
To be honest most whites can't.

>>18932976

>the lack of *significantly similar to earthlike* gravity in *long term manned space missions*

That help you read it better, you little autistic faggot?

>>18924865
why did you come to /x/ for this? the reason they dont is because of how little shit is up there, it would cost way more to maintain the base than if you just launched from earth, the moon is pretty close when it comes down to it

>>18927684
It would be easier in some respects no doubt. But the question is simply: why? We've seen it already, there's no sense in funneling that much money into something simply because we *can*, especially when we already *have*.

>>18933065
but religion is for niggers

>>18933075
only slightly.
the way uneducated people talk about gravity is painful. gravity is the reaction created by the action of EMR, which in short is why you feel a great deal more pressure/force when you accelerate.
where EMR propagates gravity is its wake,
so one just need a EMF generator, or the greatest biggest laser this world has ever seen and you can have artificial gravity

>>18928303
If the shills are shilling the shillers, who will shill the shillees?

>>18928303
ah yes, the moon jews

>>18932081
Have you done any research? I'm not a full flat earth believer but if you don't at least QUESTION the narative, you are the retard

>>18924958
Don't listen to this retard. They aren't radioactive

https://youtu.be/TW7PxXDHr-w

whats the general feeling on the supposed Apollo 20 mission that was covered up?

kinda intriguing

John maus alien contact? Anyone got info?

>>18933265
Yeap I did research. The earth is still not flat (and yhvh still sucks dicks) and people thinking it is are either dumb as fuck christfags from murica or autistic 60 iq kids. Of you got shills but those are just doing their job.