Is there really only three accounts of footage of the north tower hit? I feel like there would be more.
Follow up: Was there ANY footage from inside of the towers at all?
>>18736513
>tower falling down around you
>death imminent
>I know! I'll whip out my phone and take some video
And how do you propose they get that video? Dig somebody's Nokia out of the wreckage?
Conspiracyfags lack common sense
>>18736513
Bro, people werent just filming the tower that morning for the lawls. There is a lack of video bevause people had better things to do that morning than film a boring sky scraper
>>18736526
I get that, and I know video at the ready wasn't as common as it is today, I just figured with the amount of people and tourists in the city, more than three pieces of footage would have been acquired. But I suppose three is a normal amount considering the time period
I'm totally stumped as well. Lifelong NYC resident. Every morning all the morning news channels have their choppers flying around doing lower Manhattan and Brooklyn morning traffic reports. NYPD have helis as well. The Empire State Building and Top Of The Rock have observatories and cameras that pan out over lower Manhattan. And yet there's only a couple of known tapes of the plane hitting. Makes zero sense. My guess is that the best footage was confiscated, kinda like how we only have one choppy three frame video of the Pentagon being hit despite there being a ton of security cameras.
Cellphone cameras were a lot less ubiquitous in 2001 also
>>18736565
Gee it's almost like the traffic choppers were filming traffic rather than the tops of the trade centers. Then maybe they just might have landed, especially considering a federal no-fly order came down. Also you bet your ass there's tons of footage of the Pentagon hit but it's classified. Not because the crash itself is a secret, but the Pentagon and its structure is secret as hell for obvious and valid reasons.
>>18736519
>>I know! I'll whip out my phone and take some video
2001 assclown. The video phones you're glued to 24/7 didn't exist then.
>>18736649
I think you missed the point of his post, anon
The government confiscated all security camera footage of the attacks. There were thousands of videos taken by shop security cameras and traffic cams.
>>18736513
I was there but I died. SO no footage.
.
>>18736660
>Why would America want to control footage of their centralized military headquaters
>There must be something going on!
Conspiracyfags lack common sense
>>18736660
>security and traffic cams pointing at skyscrapers
>>18736694
Have you ever fucking gone to NYC? Everything faces everything. There is not a shop or stand in the entire fucking city without a camera pointing out it'a door because of thieves and robbers. And yes, that points them right across the street at the fucking skyscrapers that are across every single street there. It is a motherfucking INSURANCE REQUIREMENT!
>>18736526
>>18736752
>out its door
>>18736757
>clearly tourist home video
If that bird had happened to have been flight 11 it would have been suspiciously dramatic don't you think?
>>18736752
Yeah, gotta point at the top of those 130 story buildings for any zip liners. Don't worry about the thousands of people on the ground that walk past your shop or anything.
>>18736781
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=to2Yoj_s41E
Shill. Tryin to hide that israel and the saudis did this.
>>18736752
>epidempic
>>18736816
>Israel collaborating with anyone in the middle east
>>18736757
wew. that was close
>>18736816
SOOOOO MUCH DEBRIS HIT WTC-7 WTF
>>18736519
>how do you propose they get that video
The same way they got the terrorists passports.
>>18736660
This image is gay. My school had and still has a rifle team.
>>18736513
JASSM + mossad planting thermite/explosives
>>18736530
hundreds of cameras filmed the 2nd hit. by that time every news camera in NYC was trained on the WTC.
besides the previously mentioned lesser ubiquity of quality video cameras in 2001 you also have to consider the very short amount of time that constituted the actual attacks. The act of the plane flying into the building was just seconds or less if you were in close proximity to the towers. So that decreases the chances that the actual strikes are filmed from more angles even more so.
>>18736757
i kekd
>>18736519
>>18736519
>>18736519
>>18739896
>>18736519
Keep in mind this was 2001. A lot of cellphones didn't even have cameras yet let alone the ability to take video.
>>18739918
No cell phones had cameras back then or at least less than 5% max. Also, most people still didn't have cell phones back then.
Also, I walked to school in the snow both ways up hill.
>>18736574
To the point of being nearly non-existent on cell phones, that was Nokia brick era (w/ the Snake Game!) That was your standard highest-end cellular phone of that point in time.
>>18736853
You know the meme was made by a pig headed ignorant racist when they don't even have the intelligence to spell correctly.
>>18739941
Breivik guy looks like David Duchovny
>>18739896
>>18739899
What the fuck did i just watch
>>18739896
>>18739899
EXPLAIN!
>>18738533
>my school
Is not schools in general.
>>18740765
Holy shit
>>18736752
this is true,
if a camera was pointing at an angle that views the entirety of a parking lot or something, with perspective in mind, the towers could be visible if they were somewhat far off in the distance.
>>18739896
>>18739899
wat
>>18746182
>PsyOps
>>18736752
NYC didn't have cameras all over the place in 2001. You probably never visited it back then.
>>18739513
That isn't the trade center buildings.
>>18746182
the twin towers were made of a sponge like absorbent material
>>18737968
Hahaha fucking boom, well played anon
>>18736513
Why did building 7 start collapsing before there was any effects from explosion on it?
That question Clinton Bush and Obama all failed to answer
>>18746484
It's from a documentary of art students that had space on of the floors during the lead up to the attack.
>>18739896
>>18739899
>>18736519
Security camera's maybe? Dumb fag
>>18736862
>jews
>not sneaky
>>18739896
>>18739899
>>18746182
That video is compressed to shit and its all fuckity. Captain Disillusion has a good video on this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=flBfxNTUIns
>>18736513
>no one's posted this
>>18746484
Literally shilling all over the place. You're too obvious man.
>>18736660
Aside from >>18738533 another reason this is dumb as shit is the question of what happened that made this impossible.
Multiple school shootings. That's an intensely obvious answer.
>>18748058
.1991.
>>18736757
Hologram bird
>>18746182
Swamp gas
>>18747173
4 floors of the building were on fire, there were falling debris, and ruptured diesel tanks at the ground level.
>>18736513
no footage from inside the towers OP. its from a time before smart phones. that means cellphones didnt have cameras as a standard built in. 2001 was a primitive time
>>18748215
>ruptured diesel tanks at the ground level.
did they walk up to the top of the building and explode?
>>18747952
>Captain Disillusion
>Believing anything a SJW has to say
>>18748253
The building collapsed. Having a fueled fire burning at the bottom of the building, while it's being hit from above may have had a bit of an effect.
>>18748290
You have some problems with cause-effect relationships.
>>18748274
>SJW
Is this bait?
>>18748215
Diesel? You mean the substance that needs to be compressed in order to spark?
>>18748267
None except wt7 lmao!
>>18748483
>Captain Disillusion never makes a SJW comment though out the entire video
>Random black girl goes full SJW
>"OH NO, HE'S AN SJW NOW D:"
Fuck off. Even on Twitter, he still hasn't said anything political nor has he in the past. You fags are just as bad as SJWs.
>>18736513
In 2001 my cellphone, like many others, was just a phone you could carry about. People didn't just walk around with camcorders everywhere.
Also the battery lasted forever.
9/11 couldnt have been an inside job because the planes came from the outside
>>18747673
Privately own video is hard to get. Its like trying to obtain Steve Irwin's death video. Not going to happen unless the owners release it.
>>18736513
It was a time before everyone had a video camera in their goddam pocket, and there wasn't exactly a reason to be filming the WTC on a monday morning.
We're lucky to even have footage.
>>18736513
Is there any footage of you doing daily activities from 12 days ago? If not, why do you expect people to be filming anything other than expected special events?
>>18736519
>whip out my phone
>to film
>in 2001
Yeah, and remember how fun Quake 3 arena was back in 1976?
>>18750167
Remember how fun Counter Strike Condition Zero was back in the 1920's?
>>18750154
https://youtu.be/vnSegu4A5Uc
>>18736631
yeah because a giant fucking jet slamming into the first twin tower would make all the police and news helis anywhere within the vicinity turn their cameras off immediately as they descended to land in Manhattan or Brooklyn
I don't doubt for a minute that there's good and clear aerial footage being withheld.