All other arguments have sloely died over the ages, but the one

>>18591701
everything in the bible either rests in plausible deniability, or else has been proven outright wrong

If ever we find out that the universe could have been created through natural means, you'll have droves of creationists claiming otherwise. Evidence means nothing in the face of faith.

>>18591740
Hi, welcome to /x/.

>>18591701
Yes, that's right anon. There is ONE all powerful god who is in fact the master of arguments. And the name of this supreme being is good ol' Lucifer, and he'll never die. Hail Satan.

>>18591740
Who said anything about the bible?

>>18591836
Here's your reply, buddy.

>>18591841
I appreciate the (You) but really I was just hoping this thread would die.

Seriously though, that's terrible logic. We advance at a much faster rate nowadays in terms of our understanding of the universe, and the concept of a supreme being has had a big drop as of late. And the longevity of an argument is not proof of the argument's validity.

Let's say we're in the 14th century.

"It's the geocentric model that has lasted all this time"

That isn't going to last the next 2 centuries.

File: 1482031948574.gif (498KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

498KB, 500x281px

>>18591701
Proof of existence is that the argument persists, could be potentially proof of God too. or enough for some.

>>18591701
>All other arguments have slowly died
What arguments specifically?
>if it didn't exist, the argument would've died long ago
A flat Earth doesn't exist. Look at how long that argument has been around