Is there any objective and demonstrable proof for the existence

Objectively prove that you exist.

Protip: You can't.

So how the fuck you gonna ask dumb questions?

>>18351939
I think therefore I am.

>>18351916
Everywhere you look.

>>18351963
Prove that you think. Prove that you're not a simulation of thought.

Yes, there is. It requires work and dedication, though, which is the one thing most people who reject the supernatural are unwilling to do.

Only you can prove the existence of the supernatural for yourself.

>>18351916
Windows XP was the best Microsoft OS

>>18351916

No. Once it is objective and demonstrable it ceases to be supernatural and just becomes...natural

>>18352186

That's a semantic argument. I could ask you to prove that there is a difference

>>18352262
Only post in this thread that actually makes sense.

>>18352186
Why are you purposefully distorting the topic? He isn't saying that he *is* a thought, he's saying that he *thinks*. And even then, a simulated object can count as being part of existence; it all depends on how you define it, but no, you pseudo-intellectual trash refuse to do so.

You're all nothing but a bunch of cucks spouting out buzzwords and ambiguous concepts. This is why humanity never progresses, and it's why you all have been trapped in the "CAN'T KNOW NUFFIN" mindset for thousands of years. None of you have understood the inherent flaws of language, and how relying on it to explain reality ultimately leads humans to skepticism: it's circular and self-referential. You can keep asking empirical questions indefinitely to "prove" that one doesn't know if one is actually experiencing, but guess what: you can also keep defining a concept indefinitely, and discover that no word has inherent meaning, and is ultimately circular. Language is a tool, not the means to access knowledge.

You're all pathethic neckbeards destined to never, NEVER find the answers to your existential questions, because you have trapped yourselves into adopting the idea of inaccesibility of knowledge as an absolute, by taking an arbitrary approach that would inevitably lead you to that conclusion.

You "know" you exist, because you're experiencing your own existence, and you "know" you experience, because you are experiencing. Taking this circularity as "proof" of that we "can't know nuffin" is just misunderstanding the nature of language.

File: 1466498711848.jpg (36KB, 496x501px)

36KB, 496x501px

>>18352317

>>18351916
No.

Yes, there is a lot of hard physical evidence such as pictures and videos.

>>18352461

Please don't be a dolt. Pictures and videos are neither objective nor demonstrable

>>18352186
Anon, that's bad reasoning.

A much better argument is that >>18351963 Presupposes a self that does the thinking. Thoughts do occur, but are they your thoughts? Do you have a self?

Additionally, experience is subjective, so how do you prove anything objectively? Wouldn't any evidence be a collection of similar subjective information? In which case, which subjective point of view is correct?

File: images_61.jpg (5KB, 384x384px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 384x384px

None that can be dismissed as mathemathical coincidence

>>18351916
Your intuition. It is the intelligence of your soul, that is beyond time and space. It knows everything and thus how to make you experience the spiritual realm. It's the easiest thing to do, you just need to do what your intuition wants to do at every moment and it will inevitably lead you to the spiritual realm. Your soul wants you to choose to experience the spiritual realm by using this ability. If someone would show you an external proof of the spiritual realm you wouldn't have this option.

>>18351916
Is there any objective and demonstrable proof for the existence of anything other than yourself?

>>18351916

1) You're a faggot.
2) No one knows why.
3) Supernatural proven.

File: (You).gif (415KB, 480x238px) Image search: [Google]

415KB, 480x238px

>>18353197

>>18352317
>You're all nothing but a bunch of cucks spouting out buzzwords

>You're all nothing but a bunch of cucks

>spouting buzzwords