>People who believe the moon landing was faked There were

>>18119363
Don't feed the tinfoils.

File: AldrinPunch.gif (1MB, 380x213px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 380x213px

>>18119363
We certainly know it wasn't Apollo 11
Just ask Buzz Aldrin

>>18119381
:^)

All of the moon landings were fake. If you don't even know that basic part of the conspiracy, you haven't researched it enough.

You can't judge what you know nothing about.

>>18119363
There's no doubting that people have walked on the moon. It just wasn't Neil Armstrong

>>18119896
HOW DO YOU KNOW? WHERE YOU THERE? WERE YOU THE CAMERAMAN? HOW OLD DOES THAT MAKE YOU?

>>18119363
The moon landing was most definitely faked lol at what point do you start to consider the fact you've been lied to your whole life? And that any research you could possibly muster up comes from the source of this lie you insist on regurgitating? Does it make you feel smart? Congratulations, you are the moon master.

>>18119363
I remember there being only one moon landing. How come there are six now?

File: NASA pretending-GAMMA.jpg (1MB, 3000x2400px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3000x2400px

>>18119363
Your photo (1 of NASA's, right?)
is so phony, it took 30 seconds to work it out.
yeah, we went to the moon, man.
kek

>>18119913
because most of the arguments "proving" it was fake are done by people with no understanding of high school level physics.

>>18119363
I find weird is that we are talking about going to mars in 2023 and we are going to have to make a base there meanwhile we don't have a base on the moon yet we're still using a space station that orbits the earth.


Why we no going back to the moon?

The real question is, why are you so buttblasted about this?

>>18120497
Politics. Budgets keep getting cut because the public is more interested in tax cuts than going back to the moon. There's clearly no technological reason.

>>18120515
So why isn't mars a waste of time?

>>18120515
Bullshit

>>18120520
People are more interested in going to Mars than going back to the moon. It's tougher, and we haven't been there yet. So politicians make big profound speeches about how we'll go to Mars. Then later when people cry about taxes and want more budget cuts, the Mars program budget gets cut. It's already happened many times already.

>>18120522
It's not but you're welcome to explain why you think so, if you can.

>>18120525
That's a depressing, I was under the impression the reason we went the moon was because of muh space warfare.

>>18120535
That's politics. People were upset that we kept losing to the Russians. So they were OK with dumping billions into the space program.

File: nasa6.jpg (461KB, 1200x807px) Image search: [Google]

461KB, 1200x807px

Hey bro, I think u need a better picture. Perhaps put it through the shoop where de Earth be and puzzle in ur brain why there were razor and tape edits to the original photos. What u see in the OP pic has been digitally corrected.

>>18120525
Not to mention, Mars is so much further away from us than the moon.
It takes roughly 3 days to carry humans to the moon, so short trips are cheaper than setting up a base there. Going to Mars can take up to 300 days, so it's not very cost effective to take short trips. In this case, there is a valid reason to set up a long-term base there, so people can stay there for longer periods of time, thus reducing the number of journeys between Earth and Mars, the cost of fuel, etc.

We landed on the moon. You can look at the moon with a telescope and see the landing there...although the flag is white because of radition.

I challange all retards here to debunk this video as a fake.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=7ciStUEZK-Y

>>18120557
They only need fuel for escaping the gravitational field of the planet. There is no friction in space, so I doubt that the journey itself is very costly.

>>18120520
Lots of people think going to Mars is a waste of time, why do you think we haven't tried to go earlier?

>>18120557
>>18120572
our economy is in debt already, but what the heck, let's just sacrifice more lives and focus on going to moon and mars.

>>18120566
that's funny break dancing in space

>>18119363
>But dats just whut da gubbermint says happened!!!!1!!111!one

>>18119381
Bart Sibrel got exactly what he deserved if you ask me.

Indeed, if he had asked me, that's exactly the answer I would have given.

>>18120535
U.S. government had documents detailing plans to launch a nuclear strike against the moon.

>>18120856
Don't you mean from the moon, why would we nuke the moon?

>>18120870
As a way to give a giant-ass nuclear fuck-you to the Soviets without actually igniting all-out war.

They had it all planned out to hit the thing while it would be most visible from Russia and everything.

>>18120870
There was a plan to nuke the moon as a show of force, and also to study what would happen.

It was shelved because it was stupid idea. There are whole libraries of stupid ideas that got shelved.

File: image.jpg (83KB, 350x350px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 350x350px

>mfw literally all the arguments for the moon landings being faked are negated by the fact that you can definitely see the landing sites with a powerful enough telescope

>>18121095
Yeah, but all those moon landing sets are really weird.

>>18120956
would like to add that during the cold war the threat of a nuclear strike kept the world safe and prevented another world war. It continues to this day. And today most major countries have nuclear weapons and mini WMD's.

>>18119922
> How come there are six now?

File: images.jpg (3KB, 100x100px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 100x100px

>>18119768
>You can't judge what you know nothing about
Irony.

>>18119381
that old men rekt a fat guy that had a feet above him.

fukin respect.

>>18120566
Amazing video, thanks!

>>18121095
This.

>>18120207
+1

The same arguments that anti moon landing people use can be used to disprove their own theories.

There is no outter space. Have you ever been there?

It only takes like 5 minutes to see the footage with the wires that the astronauts are being hanged from.

All the footage was faked.

But that doesn't mean we didn't go to the moon, it means that the footage was fake. Perhaps there were things they didn't want us to see there.

Also.

>Van Allen belt.

How the fuck did they get past it? hm?

Don't shallow pre-chewed food OP, examine the data, then make up your own mind

>>18121095
Can you see one from any telescope that isn't government owned?

>>18121136
We're all MAD now, eh?

>>18121538
>It only takes 5 min

I've watched plenty and there's no wires.

>How did they get past the Van Allen belts

Well first they flew mostly around the Van Allen belts. Second they flew through them quickly. Third, the Van Allen belts really aren't as radioactive as you claim they are.

>examine the data, make up their own mind

I agree. People should definitely do this. Which means not believing everything you hear on some retarded conspiracy youtube channel.

>>18121570
You can see them with a telescope that YOU own.

I mean, once you buy one. I'm assuming you don't already own a telescope by the fact that you genuinely think that the moon landing was faked.

>>18121603
You're actually barking up the wrong tree.

You can't see the landing sites from earth bound telescopes. In fact the only telescope that can see them is on an orbiter probe going around the moon.

There are lasers that can spot the reflectors left on the moon, though those require pretty specialist equipment.

people who think the moon landings are fake are pretty much niggers in my book

>>18121689
fuck off back to /pol/, dipshit

(and duh, obviously the moon landings weren't faked)

>>18119381
Kek that guy is like a full foot taller and 40-50 years younger and got fuckin rekt

>>18120558
>>18121095
>>18121603

guys, you do realize that you can't see the apollo landing sites with a telescope... right? We have aerial photos taken from unmanned probes... but there is literally ZERO chance that you can see them right now from earth using a telescope

there isn't a telescope in existence that can see the apollo landing sites from planet earth

liars

Mars landing is a scamm

>>18119363
Why don't we see highly edumahdated people questioning these moon landins and why don't anyone from nasa coming out and being like its all a fucking scam you are tellin me that they just fucking go along with it?

>>18120557
It's all fun and games until Matt Damon gets trapped there and makes us chuckle with his antics but nearly dies.

>>18123407
Only by young /b/tards who wanted to seem edgy.

>>18120598
Space travel and colonisation is probably the only way our species will survive long term, which is unlikely anyway. Nations, lives and money are all trite concerns compared to this.

File: 37-intredasting.jpg (40KB, 604x499px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 604x499px

>>18121095
Except you can't. Research it numbnuts, you're as bad as the conspiracy tards when you spout that shit.

>>18123794
Or anyone from /pol/.

File: image.jpg (151KB, 900x1210px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 900x1210px

>>18123407
You are a rude human being who should work on their vocabulary.
Have a blessed day

Eh I more don't believe we landed on the moon when we said we did.

We've made it now.

Sides, most of the achievements being made were more for political posturing wasn't it?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6MOnehCOUw

>>18123798

Except we can, numbnuts, Orion is an incredible delivery system.

>>18120497
because there's nothing of value there.

A moon base is of no use whatsoever.

>>18124182
We can't actually. I'm >>18121603 and I did some actual research since posting that and discovered that, no, actually you can't see the landing sites from any - ANY - earth-based telescope.

File: 1457472683310.gif (326KB, 500x269px) Image search: [Google]

326KB, 500x269px

What i dont understand its how is it still such a challenge to actually build bases on the moon if we ''landed'' nearly 50 years ago.

It should be a walk in the park for us by now and yet it isn't...

>>18124207
Good job owning up to your mistake.

Proves you're a bigger man than those who think the moon landing was a hoax.

>>18124218
Who's going to pay for it, anon?

>>18124218
We need Cold War 2: Electric Boogaloo.

Peace is stagnation.

>>18124218

Money.

Despite big leaps in technology the price per kilo to lunar orbit is not much less now than it was then.

And it's fucking expensive.

Watch the Chinese do it in the next 10 years and bankrupt themselves.

>>18124251
This desu. I don't consider myself a violent person, but I think what we really need is an alien invasion. That'd force humanity to band together and make some actual goddamn technological strides.

>>18119363
The first one, to claim victory in the space race.

>>18122445
my god this comment, the butthur, the classic " /pol/ "insult, i just can't lmao

File: kenneth-doronin-marspumpingstationfinal.jpg (429KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

429KB, 1920x1080px

>>18120525
Do we blame the liberals for this?

File: winged-Nibiru-copy.jpg (5KB, 234x160px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 234x160px

>>18119363
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yf7UgKZqT4g

>>18120598
Fractal reserve banking (what the nonfederal Federal Reserve uses) fuctions solely off of debt

>>18124678
this

>>18119363

Who are the people that deny we've ever been to the moon anyways? Christfags? Slavaboos/legit Kremlinbots? Run-of-the mill tinfoilfags?

People who claim the moon landings were faked are either retarded or disinfo shills.

The same time-old argument disproves them, if it was fake, Russia would've shouted it to the whole world.

Now what is really being covered up are the biometal wars and the russian sneak attack on eagle's nest 1. Fuckin cowards.

>>18119922
There always were, you're just a dumb cunt

>>18124185
This

>>18119913
Here comes the Gorgatron

>>18125477
no there weren't. There was only 1 in my original universe

>>18125360
The latter.

>>18125960
nope. you are just a dense retard that cant remember historical events like these

>>18120497
because there's no theme park there, but they should actually, unironically build one there

File: fake-moon-landing_545.jpg (140KB, 350x350px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 350x350px

>>18119363
>Exactly which moon landing was faked?

all of them

God damn this thread is full of retards. Shouldn't you kids be in school right now?

>>18126293
not til 8 am

>>18126293
Shouldn't you faggot?

>>18120566
>clearly held up by wires
>undeniably held up by wires

holy shit. Kys if you disagree.

>>18119363
Sorry is this thread paranormal??????????????!?!!?????????????

>>18126315
Yes you stupid shit.

>>18126315
fuck off, we're role playing here. if it's allowed in other threads why can't we do it here

>>18126298
Nah man, I'm fapping in my office at work actually.

>>18126260
And you are just a CERN employ.

>>18126306
hahah kys, you want to see wires there so you see them thats how morons like you like to "debunk" shit

>>18126336
Thats funny, I really "worked" there for a few months some years ago

>>18126336
>calling someone an employee at one of the most prestigious and advanced scientific research facilities in the world
>an insult

>>18124218
What's the longest duration we've spent actually on the surface of the moon?

What's the shortest amount of time a building of suitable size can be built - even here on Earth?

Something tells me these answers will be wildly different. And that's just for building the place, I'm not talking about getting it running, getting it stocked, and dealing with issues that come from day-to-day living.

And we haven't even gotten into the problems the moon gives, such as massive temperature changes, exceedingly abrasive moon dust, etc.

>>18126445
>most prestigious and advanced scientific research facilities
Yes goy.

>>18126260
You're feeding the troll m8.

>>18124913
No. Conservatives. They're anti-science and anti-big government.

>>18126315
Yes, in the sense that it's totally divorced from reality. If we can have "I'm an ex-Illuminati, AMA!" and "HOW DO I SHOT SEX DEMON?!" threads, we're also allowed "You morons don't actually believe we faked the moon landing, do you?" threads.

>>18126336
>>18126531
El psy kongroo, amirite?

Watch this.

https://youtu.be/sGXTF6bs1IU

>>18119363

Why did you even make a fucking thread, idiot?

Obviously it wasn't fake. If we are smart enough to build nuclear weapons, why can't we be smart enough to put a man on that fucking planet right next to us?

Tinfoilers are fucking stupid. They act like we did something extremely special. It's fucking nothing what we did.

If they said shit like they teleported to another galaxy, OK I would have believed it was fake.

But the moon? Please. Even a retard can go there. Cavemen 20 000 years ago literally looked at each other and said: Hm I wonder what it is like on that orb? And 20 000 years is FUCKING NOTHING on a cosmic scale.

The moon is nothing. It's like a small baby saying "mama". Nothing fucking special.

>>18127129

Satellite, not planet.

Sorry.

>>18119363
The footage they aired on tv was a fake.
you would be an idiot to believe otherwise,
you can even see the wires at points in the film.

There were more than 6 Apollo missions,
all the way from Apollo 1 - 20 something,

The first few missions would have been strictly to observe the surface from a safe distance and collect as much data as possible on each trip.

This was during the coldwar, in the public eye the U.S. and Russia were "not talking" to each other in any way.

Truth is that both Russia and the U.S. were interested in whatever was on that rock.

More than 5 Apollo missions had the assist from Russia to salvage and recover any and all "Alien" tech or other items of interest.

During Apollo 8-16 the U.S. basically took ownership and from then on it has been tanked with weaponry and hidden under a mirage to keep whatever is that they have going on up there out of everyones vision.

They did film all of the missions and i doubt we'll see them in our lifetime, well atleast not all of them and un edited

>>18127361
>see the wires at points in the film.
[citation needed]

>More than 5 Apollo missions had the assist from Russia to salvage and recover any and all "Alien" tech or other items of interest.
[citation needed]

>been tanked with weaponry and hidden under a mirage to keep whatever is that they have going on up there out of everyones vision.
[CITATION NEEDED]

File: HORSLMAO.jpg (34KB, 268x194px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 268x194px

>>18127361

You saw the fake British documentary didn't you?

>>18123476
Mars is basically a tip, I can't be doin' with that

>>18127361
>there are wires

Nope

>apollo 1-20 something

There were 12 Apollo missions.

Apollo 1 burned in an accident while testing on the launchpad.

There had been a bureaucratic decision to rename Apollo 1 as Apollo 4 after the fire, because there had been previous tests of the Saturn V rocket, but the name didn't stick and it's remembered as Apollo 1.

The next two flights Apollo 5 (2) and Apollo 6 (3) were cancelled.

The first actual Apollo mission to succeed was the one after Apollo 1. It was Apollo 7. If only rockets could be fueled with bureaucracy.

Apollos 7, 8, and 9 only flew in Earth orbit, testing various things like docking procedures.

Apollo 10 circled the moon and looked at the surface.

11 and 12 landed on the moon.

13 had a malfunction and had to abort the moon landing.

14, 15, 16, and 17 landed. 18 and 19 were cancelled due to budgets and public non-interest.

>Russia and US agreed to share alien technology

Not just stupid, it doesn't even make sense.

>took ownership of the moon

actually there's a treaty claiming it's property of no nation

>we'll never see the film

except for all the film they took

>>18121603
shitposter alert. gtfo

>>18127455
Shitposter alert. Gtfo.

They past quickly over van allen belt? Ohh so you can shit on plutonio if you are quick enough...

>>18120520
>So why isn't mars a waste of time?

It is a waste of time until we have a propulsion system better than chemical rockets. Absent that we're not going to do anything useful there.

>>18119922
Oh hey I can answer this one. Pretty sure it all started when we moved into the "berenstain" universe. Yep definitely the shittiest universe in the multiverse now that I know we went to the moon six times but did nothing there. Unless we did...

Where are the moon bases? Surely it cannot be that much more difficult.

File: image-of-Apollo-11-and-van-allen-belts.gif (281KB, 1000x731px) Image search: [Google]

281KB, 1000x731px

>>18129668
Do you think the "belts" enclose the entire Earth?

>>18126934
Fucking delusional nigger, look at the pie chart for u.s. spending. All the money that should be going to science gets wasted on saving nigger lives which to me sounds pretty damn liberal

File: Budget_pie_chart_meme.jpg (39KB, 600x591px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 600x591px

>>18130067

Yep those fucking liberals and niggers.

>>18129668
Quoi?

>>18130067
Thanks for proving my point about retarded conservatives.

>>18130646
>>18130067
>>18126934
>>18124913
/pol/ is your containment board.

>>18119381
really knocked his tinfoil hat off

>>18130703
>I don't like your facts, go away :((
t. Post-Reddit /x/