IT'S HAPPENING!!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euN

>>18095899
Have you ever heard of the OP that cried wolf? Jackasses have been posting this crap on here and pol and other forums so much that it's less believable each time. Go to bed.

>>18095899
>IT'S HAPPENING!!!

For you.

he is right tho, oil and fracking companies are gonna fuck us up even more and wreck us

>get your anus ready

>>18095899


>Its happening
>2014

>>18095907
If you mean that prophecy thing - something happening in September this year I think - this is not that.

There is a clear increase and spread in seismic activity. There is concern it is being caused and/or worsened by fracking. Fracking is growing at a great rate in the US.

This might be years away, but it's definitely a concern.

http://money.cnn.com/2016/09/03/news/economy/oklahoma-earthquake-fracking-oil/

>The U.S. Geological Survey, in a March report on "induced earthquakes," said as many as 7.9 million people in parts of Kansas, Colorado, New Mexico, Texas, Oklahoma and Arkansas now face the same earthquake risks as those in California.

>"This research also shows that much more of the nation faces a significant chance of having damaging earthquakes over the next year," USGS official Mark Petersen said.

File: 4279190_G.jpg (108KB, 788x584px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 788x584px

>"If you do get a very high magnitude earthquake--and it's very possible at any time without any warning--then we would have deaths in Louisville," said Dr. Gerald Ruth, a geo scientist and professor at Indiana University Southeast.

Ruth adds that if a big quake hits the region, there will be plenty of aftershocks. He said unlike California, which experiences little tremors all the time, tension is built up in the midwest.

"In California, earthquakes are very common and the release of tectonic activity is quick and fast and the time for aftershocks is limited," said Ruth. "If we had a significant earthquake here, aftershocks would linger for months."

That yellow spot at the bottom of Idaho is Yellowstone. This is from 2014.

http://www.wdrb.com/story/26085136/usgs-increases-earthquake-risk-along-new-madrid-fault

File: frackingmap700-629x444.jpg (55KB, 629x444px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 629x444px

>>18096585
My mistake, Yellowstone is the top of that yellow streak in Idaho, not the bottom. you can see a pinprick of red in there - likely Old Faithful.

Here's a map of the 2011 shale and then-current fracking areas. Nothing directly nearby, but there's plenty in Wyoming to mess around with the geostasis. No doubt it's grown since then.