I found this tiny mark on a silver necklace - it looks like pic

Why not post a photo of the necklace?

>>18034555

Going to when I find my camera; I'm not sure I have a decent enough one to get the vii though. It's super tiny.

File: DSCN0795.jpg (1MB, 2592x1944px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2592x1944px

It's a fairly plain necklace. Couldn't get it to focus much - I'm a poorfag with bad cameras.

>>18034584
looks shopped desu senpai
not angled, while the necklace is angled, and goes too close to edge

>>18034584
>>18034602
lines of the "marking" are also much to thin in comparison with lines that should be as crisp in the rest of the photo. What i mean is that the edges of the chain and bottle would be very thin lines if the photo were not blurry, meaning that the lines of the symbol should be as well. but they aren't, meaning its shopped.

+ where do you even find a camera too shitty to take a photo in 2016, you'd have to try to take this shitty of a photo

i mean for christs sake a shit camera from 2006 could take a clear photo of this

low quality roleplay shit op

File: Humans.jpg (23KB, 320x279px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 320x279px

>>18034543
> Is this Illuminati-related jewellery?
Really?
It's a jewelers mark showing either the clasp model number, the necklace model number, or acting as a trademark for the manufacturer.
(To my knowledge, it does not match standard Silver Quality markings)

File: webcam-toy-photo6.jpg (65KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 800x600px

Pepe watches you.
And he's not happy.

>>18034612
where do you find a grammar too shitty in 2016?

seriously I imagined a hindi guy ranting at this reply as I was reading it

>>18038240
different anon here. doesn't matter if he smells like curry, he was right. the colors in the image, and the reflection on the cylinder suggest an HD camera. probably a smartphone camera.

It's a hallmark ya dink.