Considering that we know that dinosaurs had feathers, why hasn't

because it's made up bullshit that doesn't require any actual scientific adaptation or updating?

>>18034514
People could at least try you know.

>>18034525
The harder you try the harder you fail.

File: 1469420268254.jpg (17KB, 494x472px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 494x472px

>>18034499
They're not reptilians. They're amphibians.

Ignorant people who don't know that dinos have feathers saw them whilst being abducted and were all "That reminds me of a LIZARD." But they were incorrect. They should said "Oh, that's clearly a humanoid looking amphibian."

It's not the Reptilians fault that idiots mislabeled them. They were supposed to be unconscious, anyways.

Idunno. People see a thing and they saw a word. Haven't you ever heard someone call a spider an insect before?

SOME dinosaurs had feathers.
SOME, YOU FUCKING IDIOT.

File: 1453529097612.gif (4MB, 640x333px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 640x333px

>>18035221
>being this autistic
I fully believe you think they are "stupid" because they mislabeled a fucking extraterrestrial being. You think you're so fucking smart, but in reality, you have autism and should be prevented from breeding along with all other autists.

File: Rondo_Duo.gif (3MB, 386x232px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 386x232px

>>18035232
Whoa. Relax there buddy. You weren't supposed to take that post seriously.

I'm just saying. If OP wants to update his definition of reptiles to be avians, then the counter troll is to update the definition of amphibians to reptiles.

And if he asks why the reptilians--er amphibians--don't have cloaca, then I'll explain it's because they're actually bony fish humanoids. And so on.

You didn't get the joke, did you?

http://scienceblogs.com/tetrapodzoology/2009/11/11/richard-dawkins-smart-dinosaurs/

>>18034499
Because people who believe in reptilians are fucking idiots?
Just a guess

>>18035229
>Getting this enraged over the integument of dead proto-birds
Bro, you need to re-prioritize your life.

>>18035242
Great point here, exactly how a scientist can understand how modern fish aren't really fish since most life comes from evolving fish, so we're all fish, along with fish, or else nothing is a fish