Is this a good place to discuss conspiracy theories? I just

File: 1468494789652.jpg (306KB, 525x1216px) Image search: [Google]

306KB, 525x1216px

>>17943272

Yes it is.

Kick ass torrents (and solar movie aswell) were taken down by gov types. Why? because money. Tax money goes to gov. gov is a entity concerned with its own survival. Money = energy or food for survival. Basic math chemistry bla blla bla.

Theories? Yes but the more I swim in thought the further from the truth I get.

scientology is a way for celebrities and rich people to launder money tax free

>>17943272
>Is this a good place to discuss conspiracy theories?
no, it's not. Anons get triggerd as soon a topic doesn't fir their belives. This place is flooded with shills and bot spamming.

File: 1468897663844.jpg (42KB, 766x960px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 766x960px

>>17943279
I'm making an educated guess that gangs also do the same thing with the church.

>>17943281
What like in Mexico, the cartels would donate to some crooked Iglesia, Padre takes a 1% cut, and donates the rest to some 'poor' anonymous family.
I could see that.

File: Screenshot from 2016-07-19 05-32-00.png (287KB, 841x350px) Image search: [Google]

287KB, 841x350px

>>17943466
Nah this is in the states i'm talking about.

>>17943526
Why use the church when banks are caught red-handed laundering money for gangs and hardly bothered by the issue at all?

>Wachovia [Wells-Fargo subsidiary at this point] admitted it didn’t do enough to spot illicit funds in handling $378.4 billion for Mexican-currency-exchange houses from 2004 to 2007. That’s the largest violation of the Bank Secrecy Act, an anti-money-laundering law, in U.S. history -- a sum equal to one-third of Mexico’s current gross domestic product.

>Federal agents caught people who work for Mexican cartels depositing illicit funds in Bank of America accounts in Atlanta, Chicago and Brownsville, Texas, from 2002 to 2009. Mexican drug dealers used shell companies to open accounts at London-based HSBC Holdings Plc, Europe’s biggest bank by assets, an investigation by the Mexican Finance Ministry found.
>Those two banks weren’t accused of wrongdoing.

>Those two banks weren’t accused of wrongdoing.

>A Mexican judge on Jan. 22 accused the owners of six centros cambiarios, or money changers, in Culiacan and Tijuana of laundering drug funds through their accounts at the Mexican units of Banco Santander SA, Citigroup Inc. and HSBC, according to court documents filed in the case.

>The money changers are in jail while being tried. Citigroup, HSBC and Santander...weren’t accused of any wrongdoing.

>“There’s no capacity to regulate or punish [big banks] because they’re too big to be threatened with failure,” Blum says. “They seem to be willing to do anything that improves their bottom line, until they’re caught.”

>No big U.S. bank -- Wells Fargo included -- has ever been indicted for violating the Bank Secrecy Act or any other federal law. Instead, the Justice Department settles criminal charges by using deferred-prosecution agreements, in which a bank pays a fine and promises not to break the law again.

No need for hidden conspiracy when you can flagrantly violate the law without real consequence.

>>17943526
That little lizard is a reason to keep living! :^)

>>17943632
Too bad that lizard was blown up :^)