I'm planning on using a ouija board on my own to see if

>>17455252
I too am curious about this

I used to do them a lot in the early 90's, first time I saw what seemed to be a black cloud/ball in the middle of the room, about the size of a football it slowly expanded and grew.

Other times I got a spirit who told me his name,
I didn't do a board for about 15 years after that & the same named spirit came through..

I had totally forgotten him until then and it was a "WOH" moment for me.

ime it is not fake, but what you are contacting I don't know.

It is recommended to not use the board alone.

>>17455252
I'm actually experienced when it comes to Ouija boards and seances. In both cases it seems more about having a clear idea of who you want to summon instead of any name. The more you and the group know about the being the better the results get. I would suggest trying to summon a god for the clearest results. It seems when the group has the intention to summon something powerful it manifests. The Ouija board is just a tool for better communication you can get spoopy results from sitting in a circle and placing your hands on the same object with focus and intention.

Used one in an old cemetery when I was 16. No curse, no paranormal experience, no demonic activity in my life. Its bullshit

>>17456091
You're talking about the only thing in the world that seems to be belief powered. It only take one skeptical mind in the circle to fuck up the entire thing. Try again with open minded people. Something will happen.

Imagine it like a group created tulpa that only manifests when everyone has a similar frame of mind and intention.