Can any of you hook me up with some apocrypha? I want to learn

>>17454266
>Unless you'd advice against it
/x/ is not your keeper.

Check the nag hamadi scrolls translations and jewish religious texts.

>>17455217
Let me rephrase, "If anyone has had a negative experience, hit me up" Asshole.

>>17457225
Will do

File: images.jpg (19KB, 275x183px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 275x183px

>>17454266
The central study (from ancient times to present despite a information dry spell due to the banning, destruction, and ultimately the going underground of the material) that most well rounded, versed individuals would direct you to would be the book of Enoch. Also known as: 1 Enoch, Ethiopian Enoch, and the Book of Enoch. From the text we see a wide array of subsequently related material in the same body of knowledge it resides. The apocrypha, and I'm assuming you mean the "non-cannon" books of the "biblical body of knowledge" and not the Arcana (hidden knowledge of magik, i.e. Solomon's keys, grimores, etc..). If that's the case you should consider the fact that the Catholic church decided what was "too exalted" for people to read and thus their decision was to profane several books and classify them as heresy. In secret, they know what they really are. As a writer, editor, cryptographer, psyop specialist, and eccentric I would advise you toward the following: https://itunes.apple.com/us/book/book-enoch-standard-english/id1075374184?mt=11

From there just explore the dead sea scrolls manuscripts, books of Adam and Eve, and the Book of Giants, Jubilees, and then after you finish reflecting on those books never stop reading and investigate everything.

>pic unrelated

>>17457539
If being called an asshole on 4chan counts, then I have had many negative experiences, yes, thanks.