Is NASA really capable of faking pictures this well done of us

File: evening-view-of-earth-2.jpg (122KB, 970x757px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 970x757px

>>17413932
Yeah, they're obviously capable of faking them. Have you seen what they can do with sci-fi movies? It's the same thing

Also, why is NASA lying about having real pictures of earth from space?
Pic related obviously isn't and no other ones are

>>17413932
>>17413957

Last thread >>17392456.

And go fuck yourselves.

>>17413957
>Also, why is NASA lying about having real pictures of earth from space?

These pics look pretty good.
http://rowvid.com/?v=3OUTa8RhZvI

>>17413932
>I know they fake Mars pictures and alter Mars picture
How do you know this?

>>17413983
Why so hostile anon?

How is this thread effecting you in anyway?

Especially when it's a different subject from the other thread?


>>17413992
What pics?

All I saw was a fake space walk video

>>17413992
>all those bubbles flowing up throughout the space walk
ayy, that's some shit
horribly put together

It's a PR thing, they want you too be interested so there going to go with the best picture.

So they take two pics and make it one.

Also they brush out there moon bases and odd rock formations that the public will complain about.

>>17413932
Anyone who believes NASA is lying to us is massively retarded.

>>17414024
Because he can feel it in his bones, obviously. Come on, if anyone on /x/ had proof of what they were talking about then they wouldn't be on /x/.

NASA straight up says they Photoshop some images.

One of the Blue Marble photos has Photoshopped clouds and people were freaking out. Little did they know, in the description of the photo, they explain how the made the photo.

Plus if you want high quality celestial photos, you have to take stacks upon stacks of images. It can take a while.

>>17414035
>>17413571
>http://rowvid.com/?v=3OUTa8RhZvI

>>17414040
I forgot what board I was on....

>>17414029
Because you're just trolling assholes too chickenshit to ack owl edge when you've been BTFO, then just go start new threads like the last one never happened, all while cowering behind the "hey /x is bout dem conspiracies" dodge while advocating a conspiracy that has less proof than the lizardtards.

That's why.

>>17414050
No you didn't

Quit playing stupid

>>17414024
Because NASA openly admits that it alters the colors of mars photos to better fit the common idea of it being the "red planet."
False color photography is nothing new in astronomy.

This nigger knows it >>17414042

Every image of a small range of color of a nebula or galaxy or cluster takes days, weeks, sometimes months of exposure, which they stack up over a long time and slightly alter to create more captivating images.
Believe it or not, space looks a lot more boring than we make it out to be in the visual range.

Just because you're changing an image doesn't mean you're hiding something.
If you want to hide something, YOU DON'T FUCKING TAKE A PICTURE OF IT.
With all the fucking time they have with the rover, you'd think that with all the "proof of martians" pictures that exist, NASA could've just waited until that shit WASN'T IN FRAME.

>>17414053
>advocating a conspiracy that has less proof than the lizardtards

Lol why you lying bro?

>>17413983
Delicately tongue my anus...gently lapping at my butthole

I'm adopting a new policy. If OP can't even be assed to start of his thread with "proof" that's at least somewhat intriguing, I don't think I'll bother to provide any or debunk any.

Yup! It's shitposting time.

>>17414063
Lol, your post is pretty jumbled and inconsistent bro

Why would they hide real pictures of earth if they had them?

>>17414053
Actually moron this is my thread. I had nothing to do with the previous ones.

Can't more that one person have an interest in this imbecile?

File: 1280026426956.jpg (22KB, 285x285px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 285x285px

>>17414036
Their*
Their* again.

>>17414071
I could give a flying fuck about your "criteria" for a good thread. I posted a picture released by NASA that looks a little too good to be true and asked for opinions.

Every topic isn't meant to "prove" shit your moron, sometimes it's to discuss the topic in general.

I really can't stand the caliber of people on here

>>17413932
Is OP really capable of taking dicks up the ass this well done of dicks to his face?
I know he takes dicks to the face and alters his sphincter dilation. What is the deal?

The conspiracies only make sense if you have faith in them. It's like any religion, brainwash the silly fucks well enough and their "open" mind instantly snaps shut at any form of truth.

>>17414082
You *are* the caliber of people on here, fucktard.

File: Drinkey time.gif (274KB, 460x259px) Image search: [Google]

274KB, 460x259px

>>17414072
They dont.

>>17414095
What does that even mean?

Are you not on this website as well?

>>17414107
Then where are they?

>>17414085
yawn

>>17414076
Where's your image even from? Image search just turns up this:

https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZismDpIZEHyAUa_1mYd0WL4L4m2EPCtJqfYSAt_13RfESWrT1arX5NPpze9hZZ0At9UAJj8BsuDCwgpCddqx2ErjZZM85Lxe8avbly7orbsuzP3YglpH2u3EIQWoT3LqSXakyLMRuYhNUxTcTHMMWmakb800S05cu3SNCn3zYlnmYHd5pPWdbF6RjyKHZ78vV6ZHHw2nb37H4WQ7XgDm7uCz_1lq-44BCyI6ki4u0L2mxGdpK4aHhtxnOPyY1X5F0AbqzrlILhw4tU0D3cu0aq8g56iZmf4TM76-1WCyN0PXV79gHVCzapRgPUCzKifKKGdGAwmf6SZDTp1bSEzxkhZXUmcvEGAyKYCgZ8cZCe7_1hvqfElRtirXOSn_1zKPgTzcmKSp6jjlGOBQ7Mmsnpae-ERkvuyrhLzjl7JN9lIzJU51-2F9cN1aiSMwOjY8zRpH3y4FUeF5bALIcJLWkDTT5DNGCvRiYHaeKZf6eButLw9GTlwvzCadV8VlJWd6oaZtb1UISKkQMznfkaEu25lbmla53ilvAAbknqf2DxDUfsUwXTC0J7lXoB0HAkPoGFL0nPskvSjMfHz9eJwUNIM1FVgzxXpuNaHSZHgAxgxyIto9sPdiAbuJokJEL7zQ6gMJHdTMDJ8Evcxjcs1a6uLQFpSppnsHFPrM9c4b_1rPV_1Lmqv8g9BL7cicWgNKpwhFPYAC6i1GLnMw_1zJTgNcl-7ikgUlw6d2P8faQ4cgzK6eYCVilniYv8FPg0R9IQUSo5HzMQtGP6ipQjPtOFws-wpIeoDh-NQ7lU6yUpYVc1yxwoGm2Z3HIEeqfUHlpDJ5T_1kHWjn91ZKabUCGcyuEYQgZrgdeI0DdS5ZfCxd49plqWf3S-rkKXSJ9CXuIfjjx_1vTjT_1wW1uZ0tEmA1orGPsmctNtbIZod2-Eszjnp3PyYP9ZLhFSeLHkZK6RsdD5LUgVnIyCqNku0sKxPtvJdomEhhKfJo9br9kTk5BQwC18HYpjUj9NUcCZ9JHPPrgqPCV0wrv4JQcUJDUaqUrguxjAI-8HMMCgy5ZifBkmgttJ3fNEROei41LBXm98Zl1f1ddiyr5puHmXSx7G8XoMzujyhol90LIQi9lzkpknfEtcXS7LCaRKkr_1hzdrn8C9GDu91y4sz1nGniX_18zRf4HJtEybBndw6aq8i3WGl7ukL7BakmZ_1R30x_1RU-0E8gPyHKX0NGuo9a3fnTD6hXZihSIPrTHKG9Ejs-PWVSJ7vSZDa3Nf3JRIh8F5ew2fT73bWzGmw9cScN4wHlqY86ZSluPIKi2z7fyNfXepbsSGFX-o6cdtpaMZjuG72NIuBjeU48BU0wDiq8gA25xnFjw8dbrtPBPtHbTpz06xNlWC6CE9JILju26UWXIRRWxOtnkgc-AnO4ZEgMF0Xt7sjc1liF06s2F8zxVW87HaIIWhPOG6c-afG79RD6am77MdAhf1YzrnqIesPY8uuIPZDoITUv49ul8hWqGhMfxYzDyZAIViVSO0G88i6781Q0hIog6MzmFjmGBD9BpMHuIP8vfXHZi_1RlDla3-UOlWoiVwR-dGoIjK36uRsKnECGucVly1i44WDbXbMbMwEV7P-J22z7onshArtVIXbNZB5Ii8Ki2aCFEVK4YUTfjDP1WEcwyfBcJ4gEml6pNcrzblZqkVJUu1X9IWEdYGe2dw&gws_rd=ssl

>>17414095
I'm the last hope of intellect on here feces for brains

>>17414116
It was on Google images for Nasa lies I believe

>>17414112
>http://rowvid.com/?v=3OUTa8RhZvI
There's some. Choose any still you like. Voila - picture.

Here's an analysis of the "bubbles" you're gonna try to say proves it's a faked half-hour spacewalk.

>>17413571

File: 25244C5C00000578-2929876-While_lightning_on_Earth_is_rare_from_space_many_more_strikes_ca-a-7_1422451903302.jpg (104KB, 962x640px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 962x640px

>>17414112
Google.
Here's the unaltered footage (aside from a logo and end titlecard) from an astronaut from a timelapse he took to show how much lightning is visible from space.

>>17414082
>>17414095
>>17414108
>implying I was the first one to put myself above fellow /x users
>implying >>17414082 didn't
>implying

>>17414132
Whoops
here's the link for the video I was talking about if fucking /x/ will ever let me click post http://earthsky.org/space/video-lightning-strikes-across-earth-from-space

>>17414123
Well good to see that OP wasn't working an angle. Frankly, I'm amazed he could type the search with that many dicks in his mouth.

>>17414132
Kek

You don't actually think that looks real do you?

Why does it look identical to the fake pictures of earth?

>>17414136
>implying you didn't come into a thread just to shit all over it

Did you guys know that it's an absolute law of nature that all space hoaxers are cum-guzzling shitstains?

I used to ave a link to the article, but I can't find it right now.

>>17414150
>implying I'm on the side who lacks proof.

>>17414089
It's the definition of delusion. Pick and choose everything that fits the narrative, outright deny anything that undermines it or somehow subjugate and stretch it so that it does. Conspiracy threads are actually kind of interesting to me because they sort of appeal to my interest in mental illness. It has a creepiness in itself, which is what I come to /x/ for.

>>17413932
Very simple friend we modern humans havenbeen exploring and building vast infrastructure in the cosmos since the mid 1920s, the power comstruct has abused tierras (earths) resources from sipplies to money gold all the way up to humans (i.e. the brain drain and modern slave barter system) nazis infiltrated all aspects of our mil industrial complex and many other programs ie NASA (ie see father of modern rocketry) so to answerr your question the reason for the hush hush and photoshop bullshit is to keep the surface population from knowing about hidden technologies that would change our lives instantly and the fact that we ARE AND HAVE NEVER BEEN ALONE, your welcome.

>>17414150
>implying something you've never seen with your own eyes can be called fake because it "looks fake"
And if it looks identical to fake pictures of earth, then they must be damn good fakes, son.
How about you give us some of that good ol' supporting evidence or citation, and show some of them fake pictures to which this looks identical, hmm?

>>17414152
You sure did watch a half-hour video fast. That's fucking amazing. Do you have to hide your awesome speed powers from the government?

>>17414158
>implying you have proof

>>17414166
Literally just look at any "composite image of earth and it looks the same. It's funny how cities and civilization don't exist in any "real" pictures of earth

>>17414119
Yes, yes. You are the shining beacon of hope that will save the internets, you special goddamn snowflake.

Tell me, does the Chosen One verify his information or does he just google "NASA lies" and trust to providence?

>>17414179
>>17414126

>>17414039
I know right especially this guy https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ReFbVMr2OO0 holding a fucking world record for most assisting in the most launches or somebullshit like that, google is ur friend.

File: ngbbs511b7e6d40286.jpg (123KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 400x400px

>>17414179
A-anon...
are you implying that
civilization...
doesn't exist?

People just spent days shooting down flat earth and moon/space hoax for days, now this dipshit OP thinks he's entitled to be taken seriously with nothing but an image from a "NASA lies" Google search?

>dafugouddaheah

>>17414196
No...are you stupid or what?

I'm saying it's weird how there are no pictures of cities from outer space

But you knew that, you're just trying to derail this conversation, what a surprise

>>17414207
Kek

>shooting down

>>17414208
Where the fuck do you think the images on google earth come from, you unspeakable fucktard?

>no cities from space
>my sides. In space.

>>17414191
Why do you guys keep referring me to this fake underwater bubbles video?

File: 738475main_8601843216_1dc787a335_o-full_full.jpg (2MB, 1803x1200px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1803x1200px

>>17414208
good god anon

>pointing out a problem with your argument
"NO FUCK YOU YOURE TRYING TO GET ME TO STOP THINKING YOU GOVERNMENT SHILL, HA WHAT A SURPRISE, RIGHT GUYS? YOU ALL GOT MY BACK"

>>17414216
Ok, show me a photo that shows a city from space then

>>17414215
>anon1:no! Not that video. I saw another one that was super cereal fake, guise!!
>anons 2-254: oh, you mean this one we broke down frame by frame?
>anon1: fuck you guys I'm starting another thread

>>17414187
I post a picture of interest and ask /x/ to discuss

Obviously to difficult a concept for some

>>17414165
Thank you for the thoughtful and polite answer anon

Your one in a million>>17414165

>>17414226
Take your time.

http://www.citiesatnight.org/
http://www.businessinsider.com/incredible-views-of-earths-cities-from-space-2013-11

It's amazing what Google can turn up when you just leave the word "lies" out of the search.

>>17414228
Well someone else started this thread actually (I know you guys like to pretend and mislead people into thinking one person believes NASA is a hoax, but it's not)

"shooting down" implies that your explanations made sense and did more than attack the character of people

>>17414240
anon, it's new york city.
Anon, I think you need to go to bed. When you wake up, you should take some time, sit down, and really reevaluate your life choices.

>>17414226
https://www.google.com/maps/@40.6416517,-73.9171816,50145m/data=!3m1!1e3

>>17414248
It's amazing how the search "earth from space doesn't turn up any real pictures

I don't even have to type the word lies in

>>17414066
>only proof provided that of retardation

See this? This is why we shouldn't discourage kids stupid enough to eat paint chips in the first place from just gorging themselves.

Hamstrung by our own compassion, we let them eat just enough to be a worthless, drooling troll. Deprived of all other joy, they just sit in their own filth shitposting all the day long.

I've seen fields, Neo . . . Endless fields.

>>17414266
That's funny. Turned up tons when I did it. There's a good chance your computer's been infected with your own brand of stupid.

>>17414255
>offering explanations that someone doesn't want to understand is attacking their character

Quality thread guys. Keep up the good work.

>>17414284
Kek

Whatever you say

Have fun with that

>>17414287
>implying insulting someone isn't attacking their character

>>17414281
Shit, here's one a dude took with something he built in his garage.

>>17414292
Link
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sQw_C5KLhFM

>>17414290

You need to get better banter if you want to win anything.

This is why the government wins

We all fight each other

>>17414287
>implying I even did anything but lurk that thread
>implying it's not insulting to be called a gullible sheep and a liar by mental midgets and trolls
>implying you're any better

>>17414290
>show me pictures I'll believe
>thinking I'll believe any
>kek

>>17414297
I'm not so much "fighting" them, per se, as calling them out on their own hypocrisy. I don't think morons should be coddled. I think they should learn to get back on the short bus and shut the fuck up. The adults have important matters to discuss and we have neither the time nor the patience to explain to them why the sky isn't blue because of a government plot of illuminati lizard space wizards for the hundredth time.

>>17414343
Use your tongue lovingly on my scrotum licking gently but firmly

>>17414369
Trying to turn me on will get you nowhere, at least nowhere you're likely to want to go.

watch documentary called Earth From Space

Pay attention and learn

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSRgKKoLLiQ

Last post in >>>>17392456 was two hours ago. First post in this thread, nine minutes later.

Go ahead and take the glasses off, Supes. We all know it's you. At least have the balls to link to your old thread next time. It's just fucking sad.

>>17414390
Thanks for that link.

>>17414402
I am a different person that who made that thread now go away

>>17414438
I too am a different person. I'd like to stay if I could, please.

>>17414310
Woah, someone's figured out the reply button. Cool.

File: Axle Rose David Bowie.jpg (30KB, 500x378px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 500x378px

>>17414449
ok you can :)

>>17414456
RIP Ziggy Stardust :(
>and Axl's career

So Nasa lies to us? Why would they?

File: 2001-a-space-odyssey-screenshot-1920x1080-14.jpg (146KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 1920x1080px

>>17413932

>>17414545
national security, duh

>>17414621
but what threatens our national security that they need to lie?

>>17413932
This image is fake you dumbass. The Moon is way further away from the Earth than that.

>>17414545
>>17414621
>>17414626

This line of discussion does have some validity. I don't doubt for a moment we've been to the moon and have the ISS in orbit, but as far as military and C.I.A, satellites go, they do have to not talk about them and their payloads, so that's sort of lying by omission. I don't discount that if they ever saw some sort of E.T. presence, that would become insta-classified too.

>>17414627
Why can't people on /x/ mind some manners and say "well I feel it may be a fake. Here is why..."

Why the need to be so nasty?

>>17414771
Because we put up with this same annoying shit on a monthly basis.

So is the picture real or NASA bull crap??

>>17413932
You know nothing John Snow.

>>17414771
Why can't people on /x/ grow the fuck up in any way, shape or fashion? Why is this consistently one of the single shittiest boards on 4chan? Why do we even have a thread this retarded, much less have it every single fucking day?

THE WORLD MAY NEVER KNOW

>>17415390
U mad bro?

Mommy didn't hug you today?

>>17415390
I feel you in so many ways. I don't understand why people here like to be contrarian to the point of being illiterate. It makes no sense.

>>17415400
Genuine anger in the face of severe stupidity is not unusual. Being a bliss ninny is. Stop thinking we all have to "get along" with people who are too dumb to wipe their ass. I say this as someone who usually says to accept people's alternative beliefs, but this is too fucking much. I don't know why certain people, the worst of the worst, don't get shit on nearly as much as some. They deserve it if they say shit like NASA is doctoring pics. Or that the moon landing didn't happen and it's all part of the Masonic plot. Fuck em. I used to call people shills too, so don't you dare start that shit with me. I know how dumb I was to do that, but do you?

>>17413983
Are you really that fucking stupid? Even NASA admits these globe shots are built from composite images. It's 2016... You mean to tell me that in all these years they can't get a high quality, full view of our globe from space?

The shills are out in full force today.

>>17415473
must have touched a nerve.

>>17415335
It's some concept art, near as I can tell, in no way, shape, or form ever offered up as something real. Dickhead OP had to look pretty damn hard just to find it.

>2016
>not knowing the Earth is hollow

If you ever feel stupid just remember that moon hoaxers actually exist

File: 482px-Solar_system.jpg (27KB, 482x600px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 482x600px

>>17416259
if you feel stupid remember there are people out there who believe that pic related are photographs

>>17416354
Proving my point

Already making me feel better anon

>>17416259
for your information, the serious people only consider the first moon landing a fake, you know.

File: AS17-134-20387HR-smokescreen-small.png (1MB, 1645x1387px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1645x1387px

>>17416407
>the serious people only consider the first moon landing a fake, you know.

by first you mean first and last?

>>17413932
>this well done
>I hope for your sake you are not talking about your pic related

Yes they fake everything "space" picture. I would not call them well done though because the photos have many inconsistencies (no tire tracks for the rover, soda cans on the moon, backdrop demarcation line, multiple light sources)

>>17413992
>having clouds on the earth that you see at 30,000 ft
>supposedly 249 miles up
yeah no

>>17414132
>lights bleeding through the cloud with the bright white light in the center
>looking like literally none of the other pictures from space of the earth
at least you tried

also lol @ the thin veneer that is supposed to be the atmosphere

File: image.png (2MB, 1440x900px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1440x900px

The post.

Every picture ever taken is fake, even the ones you take on your phone. Prove me wrong.

>>17417755
nice try trying to muddy the waters, but if I take a picture of a real event, it will have the hallmarks of reality, if I take a picture and then manipulate it with other pictures and effects, they will ALWAYS show. We are not arguing that the pictures are not 1's and 0's and not literally reality, we are arguing that they are lies

>>17417743
Nice try, faggot.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_gyUKAXRMj0

>>17417777
>evasion and semantics: the post.

>>17414063
>NASA openly admits it alters the color of Mars

Source?

>>17417789

it's a CGI and it shows a lot. How embarrassing.

>>17417789
>those fake stars
>yellow sky
>see through clouds (looks like smog lol)
>showing a view that looks like it's from 30k ft when it's supposedly 249 mi
>not checking those quads in my post
baka

>>17417795
lol you are saying I am evading and twisting words when you are literally trying to debate whether or not the concept of a photo can be real?

Shut up you imbecile

Space hoax faggotry has been co-opted by the flat earth crowd for obvious reasons. They have a dark, nefarious agenda to subvert the narrative. All the pictures are fake, but what is it that NASA's really hiding?

Come to my website and buy my books and videos to learn the truth.

https://eatshitfaggot.fart.com/booksbyfrauds

Pay no attention to all that free nonsense that NASA offers. Come buy my shit. Learn all the cool stuff. Be a special, unique snowflake before the crowd. Impress your friends, be the center of attention. It's all waiting for you at

https://eatshitfaggot.fart.com/booksbyfrauds

Buy it today!

>>17417885
>thinks phones take real pictures

Stay retarded, faggot.

>>17417907
>that deflection
at least you can win arguments against yourself, I guess in the end as long as you don't feel like your delusions are challenged, that's all that matters as for me, reality is refreshing

>>17417927
>dat irony

just gona leave this here

http://ngdc.noaa.gov/eog/night_light_posters.html

Look at this fake cgi dog. Some faggot expects us to believe he went out in the street and actually took this picture. You ever seen a dog with fiber optic fur? I sure haven't.

File: image.jpg (117KB, 504x378px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 504x378px

>>17418025
Pic related.

>>17418032
that's clearly doctored dogo don't real

>>17418032
Look how all these shadows shoot off in different directions. Obvious evidence of fakery. What do they think we are - blind? Stupid? Both?

File: image.jpg (461KB, 899x624px) Image search: [Google]

461KB, 899x624px

>>17418055
Pic related. Unquestionable proof that none of those "people" we're really there.

>>17413932
Jesus christ you're dumb as fuck OP

File: image.jpg (2MB, 2500x1875px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2500x1875px

>>17418060
Look at THIS bullshit. There's just too much stuff to cover here. You wouldn't even be able to see this picture for all the red circles and arrows.

>dem copypasta clumps of grass
>shadows wherever the fuck you please in multiple different directions
>stock photo clouds

They must think we've never seen the country.

File: IMG_20160216_154607.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>17414132
Blue marble

File: image.jpg (64KB, 593x305px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 593x305px

>>17418091
Another piece of evidence for the dog conspiracy. How does a puppy outside in natural light cast two shadows like that? Obviously staged.

File: image.jpg (88KB, 990x660px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 990x660px

>>17418121
And deeper into the abbot hole we go. Notice the unnatural length of the tall dog's legs. Notice the divergent shadows of him and the black dog. And we're expected to believe that the only light source was a glowing ball of nuclear fire millions of miles away?

gtfo

File: image.jpg (33KB, 234x234px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 234x234px

>>17418148
And just look at this piece of shit. That uncanny valley posture, those lifeless eyes, and that place on its tail where they fucked up and had to airbrush over it. I've seen Renaissance paintings with more realistic dogs.

File: image.jpg (139KB, 750x964px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 750x964px

>>17418174
>I've seen Renaissance paintings with more realistic dogs.

Pic related.

>>17413932
>I know they fake Mara pictures.
They don't fake anything... wtf?

>>17417865
You know what else is CGI?

This.

>>17418091
>shadows wherever you want in whatever direction
because fuck perspective, right

>>17413957
space engine plugged into super computer, runs real time photo realistic images of 'earth'
and dont try and tell me computers cant make no super high detail earth because even shitty movies seem to do a pretty sweet job

>>17418425
Hey don't blame me. The space hoax crowd started it. I'm just applying their logic to every picture I see.

>>17414216
I think the person you are responding to is afucktard but no i think google earths zoomed out images and slightly zoomed in ones are from satellites but high detail and close images are taken by high altitude planes with cameras or whatever

> someone correct me if im wrong

>>17418474
Just checked into it myself and this is what I found. It's a combination of resources from aerial photography up to commercial satellites.

https://productforums.google.com/forum/m/#!topic/earth/3j4PBawX4Og

http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod/aerial.html

http://www.satimagingcorp.com/gallery/

http://www.digitalglobe.com/

At the end of the day, I think I've figured out what it is that really bothers me about flatheads and space hoaxers. It's not that they're deluded that gets me, nor is it that they're nuts, or stupid, or trolling, or shilling, or any of the rest. All of that bothers me too, sure, but at the heart of it all, there's one core thing:

They're lazy.

The past month or so, I've been on vacation, so I've had time to look at their claims in depth, and inevitably, it turns out they trusted some fringe video with shit sources citing second-, third-, or fourth-hand "proof." They watch a snippet of a video with zero context and somehow, that's enough for them. It feeds a desire to feel smart via proxy. They can parrot information and feel smart without any of the time and effort it takes to comprehend any of it. When it gets attacked, they get defensive and dismissive because they must protect that oh-so-cherished, if wholly undeserved, feeling of superiority.

There are other paths to obtaining a similar feeling, but they actually require you to put in some effort and apply yourself, paths like working hard, studying, devoting yourself to the pursuit of real knowledge, but who wants to do that when you can just stand outside the circle and wrap yourself in that nice warm blanket of smugness?

>>17418522
end yourself

>>17418435
I already said how easy it is to make fake images

But why would they need to? Why wouldn't they just take real pictures? How does that even make sense that they wouldn't?

>>17418522
Fuck off NASA, no one's buying

>>17418952
>even the rebuttal is lazy.

>>17418956
Another thing that gets me is - ok, if they're CGI, based on what? Fantasy? Is that what we're going with - that space travel of any kind at all, even unmanned, is absolutely impossible and no one's ever going to be sufficiently high enough above the surface to take a picture?

If that's all it takes, you hoaxes and flatheads need to start a fund-raising campaign. There's a dude that got 23 miles out on his own funds and shit he built in a garage.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQw_C5KLhFM

This guy used a Fliphd camera, specifically to avoid the extreme fisheye effect that comes from GoPro cameras. Be aware that the curvature it shows is much more in line with what one could expect to observe with the naked eye, and at a height of 121,000 ft., it had achieved a vantage point roughly analogous to what an ant would observe while perched atop a twelve-gauge wire wrapped around a bowling ball.

Ball's in your court, guys.

>>17418979

That's some neat shit right there.

>>17413957
http://epic.gsfc.nasa.gov/

>>17415469
see http://epic.gsfc.nasa.gov/

File: 1.jpg (265KB, 1014x710px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 1014x710px

>>17413932
A little story about that lonely flag "up there".

1/2

File: 2.jpg (223KB, 1011x573px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 1011x573px

>>17420250
2/2

There you have it.

>>17420142
Like I said, those are obviously fake, unlesst cities and civilazation don't actually exist on earth

>>17420250
>>17420252
Thank you for that. Great read.

>>17420142
Thanks for the link.

>>17417882

Do you have any idea how small 250 miles is compared to the size of the earth or are you actually retarded?

>>17420309

Are you actually expecting to see buildings on an image that scale?

>>17421380
I was going to ask that same question. I think that's part if the problem - people thinking that it's feasible to have such insane resolution in an image that you can just zoom in infinitely. That's not how it works. If it did, we wouldn't even need telescopes; just cameras and microscopes.

>>17414208
>It's weird how there are no pictures of cities from outer space

>no pictures of cities from outer space
>NO PICTURES OF CITIES FROM OUTER SPACE

Anon, are you really that stupid to understand how distance works?

>>17421746
how we can see so much detail from google earth? are we to believe that NASA has less powerful cameras than google?

>>17421746
Are cities completely brown or green?

I was under the impression that major metropolis centers that span hundreds of miles would look different from the empty natural land around them

>>17421380
>>17421425
Why do areas that should be filled with buildings look exactly the same as deserts? Why is everything on earth the same uniform color?

>>17421781
If that was the case, give me a city that would show up in space.

>>17421771
They certainly have less money. Also, google earth comes from a variety of plane and satellite imagery, some google's own, some they buy from other sources, and some come free from NASA. You get that, right?

>>17421841
You're trying to slowly twist my post into things I never said. Obviously a city wouldn't be perfectly visible

Also obviously any metropolitan area would not be brown or green and look exactly the same as the are surrounding it

But to play your game, show me a real picture of the east coast of the United States,one the most densely populated area of its size which has nothing but cities and suburbs

Oh wait..you can't

Or you can show me a fake picture with brown land that should be mostly grey

Fuck off NASA. No one's buying

>>17421781
>>17421788
>>17421841
And as a bonus, tell us how far away you think you'd still be able to see them with the naked eye.

>>17421898
>nothing but cities and suburbs
>kek

>>17421913
>implying the north east coast isn't one giant sprawling city with suburbs

What is it then? A lush green, uninhabited forest?

>>17421904
Why do you believe grey cityscapes would appear the same color as wilderness?

>>17421984
Why do you think anything besides large-scale detail would be visible from a picture taken a million miles away?

File: East Coast pic.jpg (124KB, 490x318px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 490x318px

>>17421977
I'm not trying to be sarcastic here, but have you ever flown above the east coast?

>>17421989
I don't

Again, why do you think sprawling cities appear exactly the same color as untouched wilderness?

>>17422001
I have actually. Only once though. I could easily see the the clusterfuck of buildings and civilization

I'm not sure what you think one picture of a tiny area of land proves

>>17414208
There are so many fucking images of cities from space it's ridiculous.

>>17422037
Cool. Show me one then

File: epic_1b_20160228040751_00.jpg (280KB, 2048x2048px) Image search: [Google]

280KB, 2048x2048px

>>17422005
I don't think you get what I mean by large-scale features. Cities are not large scale compared the the vast areas of nature that even now still surround them. Here's an example of what I'm talking about.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4I5Q3UXkGd0

Now how many pixels do you think Sydney, Australia covers in an image like pic related?

>>17422017
Did you happen to notice the oceans of greens, blues, and browns everywhere *besides* the cities?

>>17422041
How far out would be acceptable?

Bonus question: If you're already committed to no such images existing, how would you ever know the real deal even if you were looking dead at it?

>>17422041
Here's several, from multiple different sources:

http://www.businessinsider.com/incredible-views-of-earths-cities-from-space-2013-11

http://www.theweathernetwork.com/news/articles/stunning-nasa-image-show-auroras-over-moscow/30135

This one has images from the ESA's Envistat satellite, orbiting about 500 miles out.
http://www.esa.int/spaceinimages/content/search?SearchText=IOW&img=1&SearchButton=Go

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Envisat

>Is NASA really capable of faking pictures this well done of us on the Moon?

Simple answer really, they're not. Why the fuck would they lie to us. And if there was any real evidence at all it would be bigger news

Let me ask you this question, if we faked the moon landing why havent we faked a mars landing?

>>17422101
Relevant questions but doesn't mean Nasa doesn't lie just because we don't know why

>>17422114
Doesn't mean they do, either.

>>17422140
But I have seen pictures of Mars where they red tint every thing when the sky is actually blue and the landscape is not all red

Explain why Nasa would do this???

>>17422151
Maybe for the same reason that every movie I see these days it teal and orange - it's visually appealing. But on a more serious note, are you sure that's just not how the sky changes during Martian day and Martian twilight?

I'm not up to speed on Mars stuff to really give an answer.

>>17422151
>>17422166
On that same topic, do you really consider that lying?

More city pics from orbit.

>>17422175
Link
http://news.discovery.com/space/private-spaceflight/urban-planning-cities-seen-from-space-photos-150901.htm

>>17422170
Ofcourse to actively tint the sky is very misleading

They know it's got ruins and technology from fallen angels on it and they dearly don't want you to know

>>17422178
Are you furious at all those deceitful people using filters on instagram too?

Please take that as a good-spirited jab.

>>17422200
Are you actually retarded?

Are you really trying to compare an organizatjon that supposedly explores the far rwaches of our solar system and engaging in science with people taking selfies on instagram?

Please either kill yourself or stop posting

>>17413957
No shit that's not real, it's a fucking composite you dunce.

>>17422200
Nah but it seems to me that NASA knows so much but won't share it with us

That makes me furious

Instagram unless it's hot sluts on it is irrelevant to me lol

>>17422219
Yeah...

I already knew that and said it wasn't real

Can you not read?

>>17422216
Kill yourself faggot please finger my anus while lovingly sucking my penis until it ejaculates

>>17422231
It's still comprised of real photos. That image is physically impossible but it doesn't mean it doesn't represent a real object.

>>17422234
So according to you it makes sense that there wouldn't be any real pictures of the most interesting and groundbreaking scientific discoveries known to man

Lol you're a smart one aren't you?

>>17422248
See
>>17422253

>>17422219
They're all composites.

Satellites receive flat data which they then force into a spherical model

>>17422253
>>17422256

>no real images

http://mars.nasa.gov/msl/multimedia/raw/

>>17422253
Think you got the wrong anon buddy

>>17422260
So you're saying satellites orbit a flat earth... somehow.

On the topic of a flat earth: Explain jet lag.

>>17422262
Nah, from his response to my post I assumed he responded to my post. And since he didn't address my post and only attacked it I assumed he disagreed with it

>>17422260
Why can't they take a picture from space?

File: Sydney.jpg (295KB, 2048x2048px) Image search: [Google]

295KB, 2048x2048px

>>17422046
Answering my own question:

"The red, green, and blue channel images are combined together to make the spectacular color images of Earth, with resolutions between 6.2 and 9.4 miles per pixel."

http://www.theverge.com/2015/10/19/9568753/nasa-earth-photos-dscovr-satellite-epic-camera

Here's the acreage of Sydney:

"The inner city measures 25 square kilometres (10 square miles), the Greater Sydney region covers 12,367 square kilometres (4,775 square miles), and the city's urban area is 1,687 square kilometres (651 square miles) in size.[46][47][48]"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sydney#Geography

So going off that, and assuming that each pixel covers roughly 61 square miles(the average of the min and max resolutions given, 7.8 X 7.8), the most heavily urbanized/industrialized areas of Sydney, the grayest parts in other words, would fall well within a single pixel, the Greater Sydney Region would fall within 80 pixels, and the urban area would cover about 11 pixels. The image in pic related was taken with a 4 megapixel camera - in other words, 4 million pixels.

http://www.nasa.gov/image-feature/nasa-captures-epic-earth-image

Now given my admittedly limited understanding of how digital cameras work, I'd imagine that anywhere not predominately city-esque would only be displaying the hues of the surrounding environment.

Maybe someone more knowledgeable can come in to this conversation and pick my figures to pieces, but that's my best guess on where the city grays go in images taken from this far away, at least at the resolution of the camera in question.

File: epic_1b_20160228040751_00Sydneyarea.png (3MB, 2048x2048px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2048x2048px

>>17422260
This isn't a composite, unless you consider combining color channels to be a composite, but then again, that would make everything other than film a composite. These aren't composites either:

>>17422176
>>17422089
>>17422089

>>17421788

>we actually allow people this retarded to vote

God Bless America.

>>17413932
Stay classy /x/

File: 1454707929177.jpg (378KB, 1776x2000px) Image search: [Google]

378KB, 1776x2000px

My question is why would you want the moon landing to be fake so desperately?

Like one of the greatest human achievements, which proves that we can eventually leave this planet and explore the stars, and y'all wanna prove that it's not possible.

Not to mention, what does anyone gain from it being fake? Even if it was fake, what the fuck difference does it make?

If literally everyone thought the moon landing was fake, what would be the difference, right now?

>>17422301
BTFO

>>17423418
>My question is why would you want the moon landing, 9/11, sandy hook, aliens, ufo, jesus, god, illuminati, to be fake so desperately?
fixed that for you.

Globe-earthers give up this easy? The game really is up.

File: 1450453759073.png (107KB, 640x620px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 640x620px

>>17413932
real question here though
WHY THE HELL WOULD THEY FAKE IT?
i mean,if there is a base of operations on the moon or something,would it not be better to show it for the public rather than hiding it?
they could just show us the base,and just don`t tell us what they are doing in there
by the way,with the technology we have right now,woudn`t it be MORE than possible go to space easily?
i seriously don`t get this space conspiracy at all

The moon is home of the luiminary.

>>17424800
The funny thing is that when you get down to it, all flat earthers are christ-fags who object to the truth and do all these mental gymnastics simply because they think it goes against the bible.

>>17424838
im a ~normal earther and i just believe that they should not hide anything from us
i mean,if the earth was REALLY flat or hollow,why would they hide that from us?
also,how would the public react when we finally got ``up`` there?if the earth was flat and space was a myth,people would not trust the gov anymore and would cause complete chaos,mostly by normal mundane people that never thought about these theories
hiding essencial things to the public is not only a dick move,as it`s retarded,dumb,and full of bullshit

>>17424849
The problem with a conspiracy like this is that there would need to be so many people "in" on it that the people being fooled would actually be in the minority.

>>17423418
>what does anyone gain from it being fake?
Funding, retard. Have you not been following the news?

File: 100% charged.jpg (25KB, 320x480px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 320x480px

>>17417838
NASA, stupid.

it isn't either

File: ggr.png (84KB, 411x300px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 411x300px

>>17424849
>if the earth was REALLY flat or hollow,why would they hide that from us?
jesus christ.... every time someone asks this question, it means they have no idea what the fuck is really going on... that question is about as blue pilled as it gets

>>17425095
so enlighten us, then.

>>17425095
Go ahead professor

>>17425095
What's even more fucked up is that some people know what's going on and still lie through their teeth

>>17425103
lmao how about you do some research for yourself? That's what I did and now I am enlightened beyond belief. Read and discern, you dingus. Leave your ego at the door and have an open mind at all times, then you will open your heart to the truth of the world. Until then, keep thinking you have it all figured out and enjoy your cgi nasa pics faggot

File: image.png (1MB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1366x768px

ITT: space hoaxers and flatheads are given image after image after image, vast amounts cross-corroborated sources, and logic they don't even try to refute,and they just roll along as if they haven't gotten BTFO. Again.

At least the Black Knight had the balls to admit he'd been injured.

>>17425244
Why would they respond to fake images?

>>17425013
Funding for fucking what, man? NASA? How is that bad?

>>17425331
.....
>why would lying to the world to recieve billions of dollars be bad?...

You're actually retarded right?

File: 1453234748952.gif (2MB, 300x161px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 300x161px

>>17425338
NASA recieves 0.643% of our annual national budget.

Less than one percent. You're complaining that you think that NASA faked pictures to receive money, and consider this to be an egregious crime, when the rest of our tax money goes straight to the military industrial complex.

I don't give a shit if NASA faked photos. They're NASA. The only thing they're going to do with the money that they got from "faking" pictures, is pay people to keep trying to actually do what they were trying to "fake" in the first place.

So either way, you're giving money to NASA to figure out how to explore space.

How is that bad, at all, literally?

Are YOU retarded?

>>17425013
>>17425338

God you people are fucking annoying. You spend so much time trying to prove something fake (which has fucking mounds of evidence) that wouldn't even matter if it WERE fake, meanwhile completely ignoring the REAL conspiracies and crimes that are happening in front of your fucking face, like corporations slowly but surely completely subverting our democratic process, and our entire country essentially being run by the Military-Industrial Complex.

Kill la fucking kill yourself.

>>17425095
so you're saying it has to do with jesus christ then

>>17425349
Giving billions of dollars to a lying manipulative organization is incredibly wrong

Twisting words doesn't change the truth. You're literally retarded. Bye

>>17425359
What makes you think I don't know about those truths too? Most people already do

>>17425381
well i see threads about this stuff every day and i rarely see anything covering the constant collaboration of powerful people in big business, government and military.

i see people talking about shills all the time but i'm convinced that it's theories like this one that are designed to distract from the things we should truly be worried about and talking about.

>>17425407
Such as faggot??

>>17425359
Use your wet rough tongue slowly up and down my anus Mr kill yourself asshole

>>17425425
http://www.isgp.nl/Pilgrims_Society02

>>17425407
You actually make a good point to be honest.

I think it's just an age thing really

If you've already been aware of the corruption I govenment/business for a while then you just move on and hope other people know about it too. It's pretty mainstream news by now though

I think space exploration is a much more interesting and challenging topic to talk about and expose the government's lies

>>17425381
You're arguing that fucking NASA is fabricating everything, and you're calling me retarded.

Literally what would be the purpose of NASA if all they did was fabricate shit?

Do you have actual brain damage?

>>17414024
everyone knows this go back to last years summer u faggot

>>17413932
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7ruLqU_ndw

>>17425550
>implying government and government funded agencies don't constantly lie and mislead to gain more power and money

How naive are you? Were you literally born yesterday?

>>17425633
NASA is the least of it but you want to make it the only issue. bottom line.

File: image.jpg (289KB, 2048x2048px) Image search: [Google]

289KB, 2048x2048px

>>17425322
Like this one?

Here's an article about its launch:
http://www.spacex.com/news/2015/02/11/spacex-launches-dscovr-satellite-deep-space-orbit

And here's the video of its launch:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OvHJSIKP0Hg

And speaking of fakes, do any of you guys have links to the false-colored images? I found this one so far:

http://www.themarsrecords.com/wp/the-mars-records/nasa-altering-true-colors-pictures-mars/

but it appears they neglected to source the image for what the color calibration plate looked like back here on earth, so it's difficult to make a comparison.

However, I did run across this article where NASA explained how they created those 3D panoramas.

http://stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov/gallery/3dimages.shtml

http://mars.nasa.gov/mer/gallery/3d/spirit/

http://stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov/classroom/3d.shtml

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anaglyph_3D#Anaglyphs_containing_color_information

http://stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov/gallery/3dimages

I also so where they make it a point to note multiple times that they will occasionally exaggerate the colors of an image for geologists to better differentiate rock strata and other such things, but they were also kind enough to provide the raw images that people can download and Cole balance themselves.

http://mars.nasa.gov/mer/gallery/all/spirit

Say, you don't think maybe someone just took unintegrated red/blue-shifted images intended for a 3D display and misrepresented them, do you? Surely someone wouldn't just go out on the internet and lie!

>>17425651
Lol. Okay. There's much more. Does that mean I can't talk about NASA too? Do you not approve massuh anon!? Should I just accept that we're being lied to about whether we've left this planet or not?

Nah, I'm good faggot. Have fun being a fucking lie accepting cuck

File: 14648179676_db2001e0fa_o[1].jpg (2MB, 4256x2832px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4256x2832px

>>17414266
What about this?

Scott Kelly coming home.

http://youtu.be/qaj3vmlUM4w

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/welcome-back-scott-kelly-nasa-astronaut-year-in-space/

>>17413932
For Christ SAKE WE WENT TO THE MOON THERE IS FOOTPRINTS FROM LANCE ARMSTRONG NOW WHAT WE SAW AND Y WE HAVENT BEEN BACK ARE THE QUESTIONS YOU NEED TO ASK.
MIB
IN B4 Cruiz control for kewl kidz

>>17425123
>tells others to leave their ego at the door
>proceeds to drone on about his special snowflake degree of "enlightenment"

0/self-awareness

>>17425947
could be a real photo of the earth from space but it has been digitally curved with a fisheye lens. the satellite piece has been applied after the digital effect so it remains uncurved. althought on closer inspection those "lights" do look a little suspect. the atmosphere looks pretty realistic, unlike most depictions however.

>>17426158
Or it could just be, you know, round.

Satellite footage of earth from the late 60s:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCIH6RVlHaw

http://library.ssec.wisc.edu/spinscan/about.php#cam

Guess this is CGI, too.

>>17425669
Jesus christ you type like a 12 year old.

>>17426299
Scan of NASA's original report on those satellites from 1968, containing multiple images of the earth from orbit.

http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19710002128.pdf

The referees will be standing by to help you shift dem goalposts, flatheads.

>>17414150
>Why does it look identical to the fake pictures of earth?
maybe
just maybe
because they are not fake..?

>>17416354
tell me anon
Have you ever seen a telescope?
Have you ever used one?

>>17425359
Fuckboy, if the earth is flat and we are the center of the solar system, that means God exists and life on earth as we know it would be completely different. Wars, murders, corruption, etc would decline on a massive scale. If you can't comprehend why they would hide the flat earth, then you are seriously mentally handicapped.

>>17426431
>Lives in the most peaceful period in human history
>Thinks ancient tribes didn't battle constantly on their "flat earth"

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/history-and-the-decline-of-human-violence/

File: pillars.jpg (43KB, 640x297px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 640x297px

>>17426431
but they would have been hiding it for centuries?

Eratosthenes.correctly calculated the circumference of the world almost 2000 years ago, by measuring the length of shadows cast by pillars various distances apart. The matter is easy to verify

What reason would Eratosthenes have to lie about this all those years ago?

>>17422178

Welp, your credibility just went out the window.

Good old autistic /x, never change.

File: NASA-Budget-Federal_svg.png (70KB, 2000x1300px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 2000x1300px

>>17425633
Yeah, just look at all those funding increases they've been getting over the past decade.

File: B^U.jpg (7KB, 186x213px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 186x213px

>NASA is lying because they want to secure funding
Then why lie about the ruins on Mars and the Moon

Wouldn't proof of ancient alien cultures get the public so excited that NASA would basically have a blank cheque?

>>17426511
I watched a vsauce video that said this could also be possible with a smaller sun that is closer to earth, which is what many flat earth theorists propose. Therefore eratosthenes theory isn't wrong but it also doesn't disprove flat earth.

>>17426535
Damn straight.Sadly, here's their answer:

>because dem illuminatums don't want us to know about our ancient Aryan Atlantean roots!

It's its own unique brand of WE WUZ KANGZ!

>>17417865
Explain why it's CGI.

Oh wait.

>>17426503
Terrible argument but I'll waste my time and tell you why you're wrong. Obviously, our ancestors dating back thousands of years weren't as civilized as we are today. Please don't compare cavemen, who had to kill to survive, to manchildren today that can heat up a hotpocket in the microwave.

>>17426541
>I watched a vsauce video that said this could also be possible with a smaller sun that is closer to earth
but we know how far away the Sun is from Earth due to the effects of the speed of light

or was that all a lie too

>>17426158
>but it has been digitally curved with a fisheye lens.
Making an empty claim doesnt make it true, nor does "But the lights look fake to me" make a good argument.

>>17426564
Bruh, don't tell me you actually think the sun is 93 million miles away from Earth?!

NINETY THREE MILLION MILES

Let that number seep into your underdeveloped brain cells.

Explain concentrated hot spots the sun leaves on clouds if it's really 93 million miles away.

>>17426541
Yeah, too bad that Eratosthenes and several others already calculated that too, with varying degrees of success, and none of them came up with figures even remotely close to what flatheads' "close sun" model would require. As I recall, their model insists on a sun 3,000 miles away.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astronomical_unit#History

>>17426559
Refute the PHD, jackass. It's his word, not mine. I'm betting he's done a lot more research than either of us. Go ahead and tell him how wrong he is. And read the article I linked while you're at it.

>>17426584
the speed of light is observable

>>17426584
What are clouds made out of?

>>17426594
I'm still confused about what point you're trying to make. Nowhere does that PhD faggot mention flat earth. That article is not relevant to flat earth.

>>17426610

See

>>17425359
>>17426431
You think people were more religious then or now? Bear in mind, I'm not >>17426610. I'm just pointing out that there's not necessarily a correlation between a religious society and a peaceful one. I bet there's a few people in some sandier areas of the world that wouldn't agree with you either.

>>17414150
right.

NASA has some of the top scientifts from around our planet working on it, why do you think IF they decided to lie about the shape of the planet (for no reason) do you think they would be so shit at covering it up?

The best of the best would only be involved in the cover up, and you think you figured it all out from your laptop?

File: 1429840617232.png (395KB, 678x900px) Image search: [Google]

395KB, 678x900px

>>17425095

You believe in a God that get-s triggered by cartoons like this.

>>17426664
Only thing that triggers God is your ignorance

>>17416635
They where like 20 of them.

>>17417777
So jesus i fake?

>>17426523
Right. Because the 18 billion dollars NASA supposedly recieved in 2015 ain't shit right? Let's just keep forking over money to a bunch of liars

>>17426653
I'm not even talking about the shape of the planet, I'm saying there's no real pictures of the earth from outer space

>do you think they would be so shit at covering it up?

Apparently. It was good enough to fool most of the world though

>>17426664
>Ruby Gloom
holy shit i thought i was the only one who watched that

>>17425633
More power and money to what fucking end you retard?

The government already gets our money, you mong. Why would the government need to invent NASA to get money? They already have the money. NASA's just getting a cut of it as part of the government.

Why would NASA need power?

If the government is a single corrupt entity, for what reason would they need to try to make NASA, one of the smallest parts of the government, if not the smallest, when they have you know, the FBI, CIA, DEA, HS, and a million other agencies with a significantly longer history and significantly more power?

Do you have an actual learning disability?

>>17426848
>Let's just keep forking over money to a bunch of liars

Tell me what you think they're doing with the money.

Tell me what you think they're doing with those billions or stop fucking posting.

>>17426584
What does 93 million miles mean?

Literally, what does that mean. What relevance does that have to anything?

My asshole is 3cm circumference. 3CM! How can it push all the shit out of my colon!?

You're entire argument is "I don't understand how it works, so it doesn't."

>>17426968
How the fuck should I know what they do with it?

All I know is it sure isn't for space exploration or science.

>stop fucking posting

How about I do keep posting instead

>>17427061
So you're saying you know they've been faking it, you know for sure that all of the employees at NASA are punching in their 9-5 to do nothing but sit around and jack off?

Oh, and don't worry I caught your fuckup too. >>17427054

>>17427110
Pretty much

Yeah my other post didn't have the word "is" in it. Congrats on seeing that

>>17427061
They currently have a robot on fucking Mars taking a shitload of photos and recording a ton of data to try and find life.
If that isn't space exploration and research I don't know what is.

>>17427123
>robot on "Mars"

>>17427123
if only there was oil on Uranus.

>>17427114
So you're saying you have no proof, and you just think this because you're an autist, then.

Got it.

>>17427200
There's literally oceans of methane fuel on Titan. Why go to Uranus? I'm a rather large misanthrope, and would jump at the chance to go mine asteroids or harvest methane from Titan. Too bad robots are cheaper and easier. Dumb machines get all the luck.

>>17427410
There's tons of proof we never went to the moon. Literally none of the pictures on the moon make any sense. None of it adds up

>>17427463
As a photographer, they do make sense. You literally just see something you don't understand, and since you're too stupid to learn, you assume it's fake.

>>17427463
>baiting this hard

So none of you silly anons yet seen the clip where Kubric admits staging the Apollo-missions?
Or are you just klinging to that last straw of denial?
>fake fake fake fakefakefake

File: 1455222055877.jpg (99KB, 709x504px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 709x504px

>>17427480
>>17427478

>>17427711
>You
https://youtube.com/watch?v=PsYJfUvszq4

>>17427760
but in his defense, he was staking thunder armoyur?

File: 1434385289429.png (159KB, 1195x1151px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 1195x1151px

>>17427698
http://www.snopes.com/false-stanley-kubrick-faked-moon-landings/

>>17414081
*they're on the first one. You're welcome.

>>17427875
lol. what?

File: 1301134820387.png (312KB, 354x538px) Image search: [Google]

312KB, 354x538px

>>17427698
It is fake, holy fuck that's not even him.

>>17413932
This looks like a mockup of a new suit or something. This image isn't real. Look at the surface of the moon

>>17427951
From what little I've been able to find, it's concept art related to the Orion program.

ITT:

>Flatheads and Spaceheads claim there are no real pictures of the earth from space.
>Flatheads and Spaceheads act as if this shit is all brand new.
>Flatheads and Spaceheads redefine what's "real" to suit them multiple times.

Gentle reminder:
Pictures and Links
>>17392456
>>17413992
>>17413571
>>17414132
>>17414138
>>17414224
>>17414248
>>17414265
>>17414293
>>17414390
>>17417789
>>17417960
>>17418979
>>17420142
>>17422046
>>17422089
>>17422176
>>17422301
>>17425657
>>17425947
>>17426299

That's multiple images from multiple satellites and spacecraft from a huge variety of distances and vantage points, gathered by a variety of different space programs and private businesses and individuals.

Posts that nay-sayers can't even be assed to reply to:

>>17413571
>>17414293
>>17414390
>>17417960
>>17418979
>>17421371
>>17422046
>>17422089
>>17422176
>>17422301

>>17427951
Thank you for an actual answer 300 replies later

Not a question of if we went to the Moon it's what we found on the Moon

>>17429779
and how hungry it gets. muhha muhhaa

>>17429779
This pretty much.

>>17427698
>>17427832
>>17427925

Kubrick video hoax and how they got it wrong:
https://willyloman.wordpress.com/2015/12/12/the-hoax-that-is-the-t-patrick-murray-shooting-kubrick-mockumentary/
"Tommy" - 9:41
"Tom" - 14:10

Man, it's almost like there's people out there who will wholly fabricate bullshit in hopes of lining their pockets. What a shock.

It's a hoax proving a hoax theory. It's Hoaxception. Please take note of the fact that time passes more quickly when you're working within a hoax "proving" a hoax. That's time you'll never get back.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7r4m_nQzQI

File: 36118475-micahel-jackson.jpg (30KB, 609x480px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 609x480px

NASA don't lie. Ain't no way this shit is fake: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DMdhQsHbWTs