Does anybody know anything about what happened in Tervuren i

>>17103269
Forbidden

You don't have permission to access /.../defa.../files/grant_esharp_march04.pdf on this server.

Can you summarize what's in that link?

>>17103275
Shit man! I few minutes ago I was reading this!
Give me a minute I'll post a screenshots.

>>17103279
They're onto you!

The only reference to Tervuren in 2003 I can find on Google is a Wikipedia entry talking about a EU meeting of some description? Is that what we're talking about?

File: Tervuren1.png (59KB, 1068x600px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 1068x600px

Ok, it seems that you can't view this so I'll post screenshots I've taken.
>1/6

File: Tervuren2.png (247KB, 1147x893px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 1147x893px

>2/6

File: Tervuren3.png (2MB, 1058x734px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1058x734px

>3/6

File: Tervuren4.png (222KB, 1099x745px) Image search: [Google]

222KB, 1099x745px

>4/6

File: Tervuren5.png (262KB, 1058x831px) Image search: [Google]

262KB, 1058x831px

>5/6

I don't know why you can't view it, and why I can't view it via 4chan too, but I don't this it's a secret service.

File: Tervuren6.png (145KB, 1083x618px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 1083x618px

>6/6

If anybody got any info that I can't find in the Net please share.

>>17103269
Your URL is just fucked up for some reason.
http://www.cer.org.uk/sites/default/files/grant_esharp_march04.pdf

>>17103269
The EU just wants more power so it can retain and acquire members. It can't offer anything more to anyone except what the U.S. already offers so of course they would love to make NATO redundant in hopes of a revised treaty. A treaty that results in the EU having as much leverage as possible over non-members or excludes them altogether.