https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etern al_return This is quite

>>17077986
ITT babby's first attempt at a philosophical discussion

>>17077991
Cute but I am quite the veteran of prolonged Wall-of-text battles.

How about you answer the questions?

>>17077986
There's no Big Crunch it's gonna spread out into nice smooth entropy forever

>>17078020
the maths already been done there's no do over on this one

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bounce

>>17078020
This is a scientific thought, in philosophy you can pretend to just awaken anew in the arms if your mother after your death. So this is not realky an argument.

This whole idea is something to believe or not believe in. Just like God which makes me wonder why Nietzsche used it in the first place.

>>17078030
why does that make you feel better anyways it's like you lizards know you're fuck ups

>>17078041
It doesn't matter how it makes me feel.

>>17078028
Math doesn't equal physical proof.
>>17078020
Cold death hasn't been proven properly, and it can't from this point in our universe.
There is also evidence for Big Crunch, but it also can't be proven poperly at this point in time.

So for now this will just remain in the realm of good old blind faith.
Scientists aren't that different from bible readers after all.

In the meantime we should respect our differences and live peacefully.

Nietzsche's real argument was that your life was going to keep happening. You can either acquire the will to power and reforge yourself into a god, or you can let life happen to you forever.

>>17078491

Sounds pretty chill to me nigga

>>17078491
thanks for the quote.