There are many drugs out there, legal and banned, that make strong

definitely not man made

File: moon.jpg (179KB, 750x500px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 750x500px

This is lunacy

>>16951875
Remember all those scenarios from science fiction about grey goo consuming the planet?

What if the leftovers get sent back in time?

>>16952061

Maths: The fact that the moon (LUNA) covers the sun exactly during an eclipse cannot be mere coincidence.

>>16951851
>For example, if someone puts MDMA in your coffee probably you won't notice that you are acting like you had turbo gas in your blood, but another person watching you will notice.

Oh I would have noticed that someone spiked my coffee with MDMA without difficulty.

But you have a point, the moon has definitely some impact on people, as we are about 70% water. But again, this is something that happens to everybody (In your near proximity) at the same time.

File: 1024px-Annular_Eclipse._Taken_from_Middlegate%2C_Nevada_on_May_20%2C_2012[1].jpg (69KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 1024x1024px

>>16952067
Actual maths: When sample size approach 1 the t-statistic approach 0 and the confidence interval approaches infinity. I.E. No valid conclusions can be drawn
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Student%27s_t-test
Actual facts: It doesn't cover the sum exactly
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_eclipse

>>16951851
>the weight of the moon is
magnitudes smaller and further away than the earth. Any effect the moon has related to weight is not even 1/1000th of what the earth has.
>An adult man is around 80 or 90 KG.
amerifat detected.
>alters the cycle of the oceans
no. It creates a tide. The ocean cycles are a completely different thing and the tide is so tiny it can be ignored in the grand scheme of things
>the lava under the floor
lava by definition is not underneath anything. And the moon doesn't alter it to any significant degree
>and the behaviour of people
not when they're not aware of the moon. I.E. It's placebo.
>pulls from our bodies molecules
no
>magnetically similar
that doesn't even make sense

File: yssdk_share1434412643919.jpg (154KB, 1280x1024px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 1280x1024px

>>16952091
We are actually 99% water buddy.

>>16952091
>as we are about 70% water
This is so fucking retarded. The moon exerts equal pull on everything, that's how gravity works. The only reason only tides are visible (to the naked eye) is because the oceans are so fucking huge that even a 0.000000001% change is several meters on a shoreline.

>>16952148
no. wrong.

File: UNdJijG.jpg (79KB, 790x318px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 790x318px

>>16952142

>the tide is so tiny it can be ignored in the grand scheme of things

Person that's never even seen the ocean in real life detected

Tides, when absolutely nothing happens.

File: TidesIslaPalenque.jpg (41KB, 600x400px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 600x400px

>>16952206

>>16952202
person that's never actually read anything about the ocean detected. See >>16952154
Also see wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_decadal_oscillation
The moon and tide isn't even mentioned

File: 29fyr34nD1c3 .jpg (64KB, 567x700px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 567x700px

>>16952142
>lava by definition is not underneath anything.

That makes sense to you???

Lava can't be under a cloud, or under a plank I toss on it to watch it burn, or under the sea?

Like a cat always landing on its feet, lava FLIPS to be over anything that tries to be over it!!

OP is a fag that has never taken molly or seen the ocean.

>>16952067
It can be a coincidence, easily. It's just massively unlikely.

Try getting a body that massive into geosynchronous orbit without a massive network of thrusters to stabilize the orbit after it's thrown into the solar system. I know of only one potential entity that has that capacity, and it's made of nanites and time travel.

The precision involved in creating the moon's orbit is beyond anything that 36.3% of the universe has ever known or seen.

>>16951851
Men is food for the Moon. Quite right.
It's the weight of the clockwork.

File: 1344927544242.jpg (95KB, 487x453px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 487x453px

>>16953183
>geosynchronous orbit

Erm, no. The moon is not is in "geosynchronous orbit" then it'd seem to be over on spot on the Earth at all times, which would require it to match the Earth's rotational speed... it'd be fuckin' cranking, covering in 24 hours the area it now covers in about 28 days.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geosynchronous_orbit

>>16952219
What the fuck are you on bro. He was talking bout that magma life faggot.

>>16953227
One side is always facing us. Is there a name for that type of orbit?

File: 1423733511078.gif (888KB, 480x267px) Image search: [Google]

888KB, 480x267px

>>16952219

>>16951851

Except that that is purely pseudoscientic rambling horseshit, and kill yourself.

>>16951851
Please to note that each post in this thread is spread out across time, people, and just about everything else you can imagine. Failing to value the rate at which topics change during a conversation involves coming to appreciate the distinction between website interfaces. Mnemo is dead wrong about that part. He's also a liar that intends to mislead you at every step. Not necessarily by his own volition, mind you; you should listen to him either way. Just so you can track the changes in his beliefs, nothing else.

>>16954243
Not that I've ever heard of in my education or work. The moon is lop-sided and the pull between Earth and Moon doesn't let it rotate anymore (virtually).
>Aerospace Engineer

File: image.png (503KB, 422x594px) Image search: [Google]

503KB, 422x594px

>>16951918
Lunar-cy

>>16951851
By OP's logic traveling to different latitude should exert change since g varies depending on where you are, and thats much more significant then the moons pull.

>>16952067
Total eclipse only happens rarely compared to other eclipses.

>>16952142
Well there is certain amount of tidal friction going on underneath ourselves, which slows Earth's rotiation but its only relevant amount over geological time.

>>1695424
Its not any kind of named orbit, its called being tidally locked and basically the endgame for planetary satellites, our moons not the only one.

>>16954431
>>Lunacy
>Luncar-cy
Luna-psy

File: 1395789442112.jpg (207KB, 1290x730px) Image search: [Google]

207KB, 1290x730px

>>16954243

>One side is always facing us. Is there a name for that type of orbit?

Tidal Lock

See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal_locking#The_Moon

>>16954422

>The moon is lop-sided

Erm, No. There's a weird cloud of dust around the moon that bulges towards Earth, maybe that's what you're thinking of...

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/06/150617-moon-dust-cloud-comet-space/

>>16954608
Kek... Cute

>>16954377
Nice trainspotting

>>16952142
amerifat detected? 80-90-kilos is what you consider fat for someone who is 6'2"?

and moons effect on our bodies is just a placebo huh? i guess you should alert the medical community to this fact and they can surpress menstrual cycles of women by telling them that the moon doesnt exist

the combative and sometimes juvenile nature of your responses indicates that your objective is to be contrarian and attempt to rustle someones jimmies; not to be informative or to help draw logical conclusions. eurotrash suffering from american envy detected

File: 1278717357829.jpg (205KB, 466x700px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 466x700px

>>16954726

>they can surpress menstrual cycles of women by telling them that the moon doesnt exist


!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

File: cut.png (553KB, 892x916px) Image search: [Google]

553KB, 892x916px

>>16954752

File: 1412190675367.png (2MB, 1497x1241px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1497x1241px

>>16954753

>>16954752
>>16954753
>>16954759
What kind of data analysis am I supposed to be looking at here?

>>16954726
6'2'' isn't an average height you retard
>moons effect on our bodies is just a placebo huh?
Yes http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=%22full+moon%22
>menstrual cycles
are not connected to the moon you retard
>not to be informative or to help draw logical conclusions
I'm not trying to do any of that. I simply enjoy shitting on idiots like yourself. And then watch how you embarrass yourself even more by trying to respond instead of realizing you're wrong and ignorant.