Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
File: Two spooky four me.png (11KB, 331x298px) Image search:
[Google]
11KB, 331x298px
I've been trying to find a torrent of a program called Digicel Flipbook ProHD. I've tried several torrents but they all seem to be inactive or not working for whatever reason. (That said outside of pirate bay I don't really have any places I would look consistently)
This led to me going to sketchy sites looking for direct downloads. Aware of the risk I have scanned everything I've come across for viruses and I have two possible options here:
The two files below were put through Metascan Online (Which puts the file through 43 scan engines) and Kaspersky Security Scan:
1st came from: http://thawngzaliansharesite.blogspot.com/2011/09/digicel-flipbook-prohd-693-free-full.html
>Metascan found nothing wrong with the extracted files (it was a rar file) but 1/43 detected "Suspicious.Cloud.2" in the original file (which to my knowledge could be a false positive)
2nd came from:
http://getintopc.com/softwares/3d-animation/digicel-flipbook-prohd-free-download/
>No threats from Metascan (this one is exe file)
>Both files passed Kaspersky
Is it worth the risk here? I really want the program but I also can't afford to fuck up my computer. Thanks for reading.
>>
File: 1453455565233.jpg (129KB, 704x792px) Image search:
[Google]
129KB, 704x792px
install the os into a virtual machine and test the program there. if it messes things up there you can just delete the vm file leaving your regular os untouched.
>>
http://www.flipbookpro.com/download/SETUPFB694.EXE - latest version that's cracked
http://www48.zippyshare.com/v/19950056/file.html - patch.
Use CGPersia for software like that.
>>
>>39017
Hadn't thought of this thanks a lot. Will be testing with this in now and in future cases
>>39052
Not trying to call you out (I'd like to hear more from you actually) but scans detected
Trojan.Win32.A.Badur.10541270[h]
in the file in the first link. I'm not a computer genius or anything but to me that is a huge red flag.
>>
>>39125
>in the file in the first link
Well, that's an executable from official site.
>>
>>39133
Oh shit I just realized. That's just... very confusing to me then. I do appreciate the help btw anon.
>>
>>39144
No worries. Google "false positives antivirus alerts" btw. If a few of AVs detect a virus it's most likely safe unless it's just discovered. Some AVs are pretty paranoid (but that's not always very bad).
>>
>>39146
Hey if you're still around I just wanted to ask about the patch you listed. Chrome blocked it automatically as malware, I recovered the file and scanned it with malwarebytes which identified it as malware. Any chance that is a false positive as well?
Thread posts: 8
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2