/r/ing that one pic from Euphoria of Rika's burger with

File: In This Moment I Am Euphoric 1.jpg (167KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 800x600px

>>362088

File: In This Moment I Am Euphoric 2.jpg (243KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

243KB, 1024x768px

>>362088
>>362093

>>362093
>>362094
thanks mate

>>362094
>>362093
thats not safe for work, you dumb fuck

>>362339
I don't see any nudity or gore though?

>>362340
Would you show your boss that picture, retard?

Would you even show it to your mother?

Read >>/1/ again
>All threads and images should pertain to "work-safe" material.

>>362343
Why would you show your mother any image in 4chan?

>>362343
pragmatics

>>362345
>>362346
>hurr durr i dont have to follow the rules becuz dis is 4chan!!!

End yourselves.
I don't need to explain how retarded you are for thinking that a picture of a girl eating a plate full of semen is considered work safe.

>>362348
I think you're taking that term a bit too literally

>>362343
pretty sure you'd get canned pretty quick if you showed your boss that you were browsing 4chan at work, regardless of whether the image was pornographic or not

also, mucus isn't NSFW, snot isn't NSFW, what makes semen so special (assuming you can even prove from the information only in that image that it's semen?)

>>362358
>>362358
>what makes semen so special (assuming you can even prove from the information only in that image that it's semen?)

Are you literally 12?

>>362360
explain to me why depicting semen is wrong but not snot

>>362361
Semen is a bodily fluid of sexual activity. It's presence implicates sexual activity and is only used in sexual expressions (in the case, fetishing the act of eating it)

It's not something people want to see if they aren't in the mood for it. Similar to how you would look away if you saw someone eating snot.

>>362364
Babies' presence implies sexual activity as well but they're still SFW. (Clothed) pregnant women are SFW. How is semen not? There is no actual sexual activity going on in the pic

>>362368
A babies presence implicates that sex happened at one point in time.

Semen on the floor, in the food, being eaten, implicates it was just jerked from a nearby penis.

Stop being a literal child, you have ZERO arguments.

>>362364
I'm never in the mood for eggnog but I don't mind pictures of it. You understand the abbreviation of NSFW but you neglect the context and colloquial meaning of it.

>>362370
>>Semen on the floor, in the food, being eaten, implicates it was just jerked from a nearby penis.
Ever heard of a sperm bank?

There's no way to prove it was freshly squeezed from the context of the image provided. YOU have no argument

>>362375
Is your argument for this picture being SFW actually that

>This little girl went to a sperm bank, was able to take sperm from there (not possible) and bring it back to her house where she poured it on herself and her food before consuming it. All because she wanted to simply and non-sexually eat semen.

Seek help.

>>362378
my argument for it being SFW is that it's not displaying sex

YOUR argument was that it IS displaying sex because it's displaying semen which comes from sex (literally this post >>362364 don't even try to deny it)

>>362380
It pertains to sex, it is not SFW.
That simple.

>>>/1/

>>362381
>babies

>>362381
Are you literally 12?

>>362383
>Autist with the inability to follow one simple rule calls others 12

Hmm

That's clearly southern-style gravy spilled all over her meal. Completely worksafe.

>>362343
why the fuck is this thread still up? oh it's because this retard sperged out

>>362634
>asks why thread is still up
>bumps thread to page 1
You're not helping.