Can someone help me out this please? I'll post what I've got so far
This is where I've got to. Looking specifically at the beta part under the line on the page, I've almost got it. Thinking I just don't take the second derivatives and say they're too small to matter, but how do I get rid of the first derivatives? Thanks in advance
hopeful bump
Taylor series is overkill. Just use f(x+Δx) - f(x) ≈ df/dx * Δx. Also, you see what is actually happening instead of just manipulating symbols.
I'm not using second derivative, just continuity of α and β. (So their value at (x-δ,t) is approximately equal to the value at (x,t). The difference goes to zero.)
[I didn't look at your scribbles.]
damn connection errors constantly
>>312764
Maybe it's because of the special symbols I'm typing. Test...
>>312820
Thanks a lot, this helps a bunch
Can anyone sketch signed directed graphs to illustrate the interactions between chemicals in an
activator-inhibitor (A-I) system and a positive-feedback (P-F) system? It's a question I'm certain is going to come up in the exam next week and I'm completely drawing a blank. There are no such graphs in any of the notes. Thanks guys
>>312893
something like this maybe?
just a guess
>>312901
Cheers, might be right, who knows. I can put down something like that and hope for the best. Might not even need it as it's 10 marks in part a of a question which is out of 50 but capped at 40