Can someone enhance this pic? It was randomly sent to my email

it doesn't work that way.

You can't enhance details that aren't there in the first place

>>215471
But the words are there, aren't those considered as details?

>>215472
no, the words are not there. there are blurs that look like words, but there's no way to tell what they are. 'enhancing' only makes what you can already see clearer. if you can't see anything, enhancing it won't help at all

>>215473
so there is nothing I can do?

>>215474
not if this is the only picture you have, no

>>215473
I dunno anon, I think an AI trained to interpolate text might be able to guess what the original unblured text is (assuming there was some), but good fucking luck finding a tool online that does that.

>>215471
>>215473
>>215477
You're flat wrong.

For stuff like that, you just(!) write a script that generates all possible text for each blob, and sees what matches.

This is eminently doable, though there's no off-the-shelf solution.

https://dheera.net/projects/blur

OP, why when I 'copy' this image into Paint, does it come up entirely as black?

File: 1478229954658.png (5KB, 366x86px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 366x86px

>>215573
transparent background.

So who sent this to you, OP?

It seems like a deliberate attempt to mind-fuck you.

Why would someone send you something that's completely unreadable?

>>215576
>Why would someone send you something that's completely unreadable?

I've seen what some people post on the Internet, so I'm not surprised.

Gaussian blur can be reversed. You shouldn't have much trouble googling software that does it. If this blur isn't Gaussian, it won't help, but you can try.