Anyone care to turn these into renders? I wanna make something

File: 1476887263093.png (165KB, 852x362px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 852x362px

Image is a bit low quality to get a good edge on cat, so be warned

also

>render
this means nothing and confuses anyone who actually uses photoshop

>>207434
>>207439
ah ok, thanks so much anon!

>>207439
>render means nothing
nice meme

>>207454
S'true, though.

The .jpg is a file, and the act of putting it on your screen is rendering.

So any image you're looking at is, by definition, a render.

>>207469
Except in the context the OP presented, "render" is used to mean "cut this picture out and turn the background transparent".

>>207469
Whatever you want to call it, you did a really lousy job of it.

>>207492
The word already had a meaning before people like OP's attempt to redefine it as a subset of the thing it already meant.

It's like trying to say that "cat" now means "black cat", and then posting a picture of a cat and asking for it to be photoshopped into a picture of a cat.

>>207499
>The word already had a meaning before people like OP's attempt to redefine it as a subset of the thing it already meant.

Many words have multiple meanings and it's up to you to use context clues. Regardless of your personal little world, people have been using "render" to mean "cut out picture with transparent background", for ages.

That's a terrible analogy, really. I'm surprised it wasn't related to food.

>>207525
>surprised it wasn't related to food.
In some places it could be.