I'm looking for a high res version of this misfits logo

>>206532
Couldn't find that exact one friendo, but misfits are sellout mass producing faggots so you can buy their actual logo for a nickle, no need to go /DIY/ on it!

>>206645
Find me a first gen punk band that isnt, friendo! But yeah, if they sold this one in patch form I would, but it only exists in shirts, apparently. I could buy a shirt and convert it into a patch I guess, but they're like $25 so fuck that noise.

>>206814
>implying the misfits are a "first generation punk band"
They are not, they're from tye L.A. Punk scene, not at all first wave
Not even the Pistols are first wave of Punk
>a band that didn't sell out?
Any proto-punk band but the Ramones
>Death
>The Stooges
>The Saints
>The Modern Lovers

Look past them sellout faggots, the misfits and get into REAL punk rock!
There is nothing about "Horror-Punk" that gives it tge right to call itself "punk"

>>206997
The*

>>206997
>proto punk

Not punk by definition, yeah? I do love Death, The Modern Lovers, The Sonics, etc, but their shit doesn't look especially cool on a leather jacket. I don't really give a fuck about being true to a scene that's been dead since the early 80s, desu.

File: the-modern-lovers-5338d161e98dd.jpg (109KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 1000x1000px

>>207178
>proto punk
Yes, siree, proto punk is by all definitions Punk Rock. It's wave zero on punk history

And I beg to differ, The Modern Lovers' logo would look especially badass on a leather jacket
The misfits logo, on the other hand, Will just say you're a poser, friendo.
That's no bueno