Just bought a 4k monitor. 4k thread? it will be hard finding some but ill be sure to post some papes. i dont have a 4k folder.
bamp
/wg/ hates 4K for some reason.
standard 1080p papes look okay on 4K monitors, worst case scenario.
a few screencaps from the photography documentary/earth porn "Tales By Light," episode 1
>>6868036
>this
I have a 1440 monitor and 1080p papes look atrocious on it I can only Imagine what its like on 4k
>sorry I'm a bit of a sesquipedalian
>>6868756
That's probably because the scaling's off. 1080 to 4k is doubled pixels in each direction, so it's not ideal, but it's not some fucked up affair with random rows of pixels being added like 1080 to 1440 would be.
Posting what I got.
>>6869653
2
>>6869654
3
>>6869655
4
>>6869656
Woops. 4
>>6869657
5
>>6869658
6
>>6869659
7
>>6869660
8
>>6869661
9
>>6869663
10
>>6869664
11
>>6869665
12
>>6869666
13
>>6869667
14
>>6869670
15
>>6869673
16
>>6869687
17
Last one for tonight, guys
I have some random ones
op here. thanks for the posts. I ended up finding out i had no other 4k papes, that's why i only posted one. Sorry.
i made this the other day
>>6871977
top kek
>>6872600
>>6872607
>>6872608
>>6872611
>>6872612
>>6872613
>>6872614
>>6872616
>>6872617
>>6872621
>>6872623
>>6872625
>>6872630
>>6872632
>>6869067
1440p is around 70% more pixel density
WTF are you on about
>>6873069
1080p to 4k is exactly double the vertical and horizontal pixels (1:2), so each pixel of a 1080p image just uses 4 pixels of the 4k display.
1080p to 1440p isn't a whole number ratio, so you're doing something more like 1:1.3, which means not every pixel of the image gets its own pixel of the display, causing it to look blurrier than it would on a 4k monitor.
It's not about the density, it's about getting the pixels to line up, basically.
>>6873148
Got it. I thought you meant detail res
>>6871977
THIS IS AN OLD WINDOWS 95 BACKGROUND!
>>6868756
>>6868036
1080p papes look atrocious on my 1080p monitor lol, i think mine has larger dimensions than most or something like that
what am i using? a 56k modem?
>>6874320
Half of these wallpapers would have taken at least 30 minutes to download in the 56k days.
>>6867000
I just took this picture, enjoy.