>on-rails shooter disguised as a photography game Is there

>>4247560
It's a lovely game. The problem is, there isn't much replay value once you've shot 'em all

File: snap.gif (737KB, 250x283px) Image search: [Google]

737KB, 250x283px

>>4247565
Unless you play for score. Ever tried to beat the default hi-score on each stage?
It's also fun if you have someone else playing the game and compete to get the best rated shots of this or that monster.
But yeah it's rather short and it's a shame it doesn't have all 151 monsters.

What I didn't like about it is that you can beat it in one sitting.

>>4247615
Do you always post the same reaction image when you come into threads to complain about the other posters?

>>4247624
Yeah, that's kinda how it is with rail shooter games, they usually don't take more than an hour to beat.
Of course, with Pokemon Snap it's even easier because you can't really lose. The flow of the game for a first time playing it blind would mean replaying levels more than once though. I remember on my very first time playing the game back then, it took me a few days to find all the secrets and rainbow road.

>>4247636
You can't lose, but you do have to find secrets (i think) to unlock later levels

File: Snap.jpg (137KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 640x480px

>>4247641
Yeah that's what I meant.
Levels need to be unlocked, I think only the first level doesn't have an alternate exit.

File: d98.png (445KB, 1019x789px) Image search: [Google]

445KB, 1019x789px

>>4247615
>hating on japanimals on an oriental basketweaving forum

File: DEAL WITH IT.png (67KB, 666x666px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 666x666px

>>4247630
I spent good time on that image. You'd best save that shit and proliferate the fuck outta it.

I never could find one of the pokes, Dragonite I think.

Tried beating the hi-score on the levels. It's tougher than I thought.
Only managed to do it on the beach and the cave.

>>4248327

throw 5 or so smokeballs in the whirlpool in the canyon level. It's easier to do it even by accident.

Not a game. You can't lose

>tfw the Wii U was the perfect console for a Snap sequel and it never happened

>>4251032
>Nintendo in charge of being logical

>>4250761
you can't "lose" in the traditional sense, but if you can't surpass the hi-score in each stage, you can't consider you've "won" either.
Also, filtered.