Can we PLEASE stop shilling bad games just because they're

No. Get over it.

>>4188591
That wiki is hardly even worked on by anyone from 4chan anymore OP you're better off asking leddit and I don't mean that in the usual insulting way most people do here, they've seriously been the main contributors to that wiki for years now.

>>4188591
I thought it was alright. Specially love the haunted mansion level.

>>4188591
>we
That wiki is 100% run by redditors using the 4chan board name in order to shill whatever the hell is out there/paid for. And I mean redditors as in the actual ones and not some brand of newfag.

Wikies run from this place have always had this problem, regardless of Reddit.

I remember when the PSP was a year old and the retards here tried to genuinely pitch every mediocre multiplatform shovelware as a good game. Some people just live in a bubble and don't understand that a recommendations page is supposed to give them highlights, not some bullshit they found somewhere.

File: Untitled.jpg (79KB, 885x341px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 885x341px

>>4188701
>using the 4chan board name in order to shill whatever the hell is out there/paid for.
I wish it were that but the reality is that it's been coopted by people who don't even know what /v/ is.

Clearly we should go into that wiki and start adding joke entries.

Ah. The thing with these lists is that they aren't really going into detail what makes the game great. It's more a list of:
>games that aren't bad because you can play them start to finish
Also notice how only the graphics are mentioned?

Also any sort of compilation picture posted frequently has many, many issues. I've seen some for modern 3ds/vita games and 90% of those games alone are inferior ports or reskins of existing games avaible anywhere else.

>>4188591
We had a chart thread the other day, those are better for recs.