Maybe someone here can help me find a lost game.
Google searches turn up nothing, but I remember that it was called "Tales of Bowdain" or something very similar. A top-down RPG with minimal tile graphics and no real animations, where you controlled a single character exploring an over-world and dungeons, but encounters (always with a single random monster) were handled in a text-only interface. It was a bit of DOS/Win95 freeware, and I never managed to beat it; but I'd like to, given the chance.
Do we have any grognards here that might remember such a thing?
The first thing that I thought of was Castle of the Winds, but that's probably not what you meant by text interface.
>>3786478
>lost game
Did you check in the sofa? That crack where daddys keys are sometimes? Google is great but probably not gonna help you find a game you lost.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/lost
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/forgot
The more you know
>>3786783
The only thing worse than being a pedant is being an incorrect pedant. "A lost work of [media]" is idiomatic English.
Tales of Maj'Eyal?
Tales of Banalia?
>>3787134
No, it was definitely "Bowdain" or "Bowdane" or something very close to that.
>>3787123
But it's not lost sport. You just forgot the name. Being incorrect about someone being incorrect is worse.
>>3788061
But I didn't forget the name. "Tales of Bowdain" is the name of the game. But it's nowhere to be found on the modern web-two-point-oh, which makes it lost.
I have to know, what's it like being as wrong as you must be all the time?
>>3788121
If you can't provide any evidence of its existence whatsoever then it's not lost it's made up.
>>3788121
You know what's easy to find on the modern web? People who have convinced themselves of something that never existed. Yes. It's a giant conspiracy to purge the web of all record of this game and make you look like a fool. It's totally not that you don't remember the actual name of the game. kek.
>>3788121
Kekerroneous