>Play California Speed on MAME >The FPS is all over the

>>3754913
it's like that because mame uses a very slow method for rendering 3d. get a faster cpu

the arcade game was fine

>>3754921
I'm not talking about MAME's performance, it always runs at 100 percent, I'm talking about the internal performance

File: proof.jpg (493KB, 2604x504px) Image search: [Google]

493KB, 2604x504px

picture related, the game seems to switch from 60/30/20/15fps depending on what scene is going on, the problem is that it seems to keep switching from 30 to 15 to 60 way too often making for an unstable and unpleasant image, i'm just asking if the arcade version exhibited such radical FPS changes

Buy the 64 cart. Its cheap and fun.

>>3754942
no it did not, like you have already been told

>>3755278
Well then that's just great, thanks MAME devs for getting the emulation wrong

Crusin USA looks like it uses the same engine and it is really jerky in the arcade

>>3754913
any good?

>>3754913
The N64 version is one of the shittiest games I love. Game is objectively low-budget dreck but it has so much content.

>>3754913
I think MAME devs just haven't put much effort into 3Dfx stuff. Both California Speed and San Francisco Rush are much jerkier than they are on the original hardware, Rush: The Rock stops working after the menus, and Rush 2049 (the superior arcade versions) doesn't even start.

>>3756498
The games use very different hardware though, might be easier to make a new engine instead of porting it to the different architecture.