We're always going on about the "Retro Experience"

Is VR porn a viable alternative to a girlfriend?

>>3421362
Well, I certainly wouldn't be spending money on a potential bitch, viable? Probably, pathetic? Yes.

But in the case of games, they're still games, inside VR or not, but I think such would depend on perspective, collecting a bunch of hardware that you might need to maintain later, even though great is not necessarily a good thing because of the space it requires, besides the endless hours of fun, it can also be a frustrating activity in some areas.

>>3421606
All those arguments can be made about girls too except the virtual girls are going to be sexier than the real ones. Still not the same.

>>3421763
That's a relative experience honestly, and the argument is pretty pointless, of course, a living breathing woman is never bad it's just I wouldn't normally waste time with the girlfriend thing because it usually leads to shitty situations, I prefer an actual relationship I know that will work because it's a higher chance I'm gonna dump a woman really quick, a video game not so much but the video game I can give it to my friends or sell it if unwanted, as long as a copy is good, a cheating woman will probably give me aids real quick, and a bitch might try and get pregnant, I can cheat in a game though and the game won't usually give me shit. Not that any of this matters because it's not related too much in the argument as this last post was a joke with some truth to it, and you should not care.

>>3421087
Most people prefer those settings because that's the way the game was intended to be played

VR is cancer in all it's forms. I don't know how people feel about the "retro experience" but I don't really care about it. I just want to get the best display I can for a game and I like collecting consoles.