Pokemon: 4 > 5 > 7 > 6 > 3 > 2 > 1 JoJo: 7

>>33560405
>3 that low on both Pokemon and JoJo
That's some really bad taste, just leaving out the most iconic parts that pretty much formed the franchises out of the obscurity they were beforehand. Agree that 7 is best on JoJo though but >Sinnohfetus
your opinion doesn't matter anymore.

File: 1456615846721.png (175KB, 1053x1070px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 1053x1070px

>putting 3 above 2

>>33560415
Gen 3 and Stardust Crusaders aren't *bad* per se, but they rank low because Gamefreak and Araki respectively were still trying to get a feel for the series.

JoJo and Pokemon never really came their own until Part 4 and Gen 4 respectively.

File: 1499218300134.png (227KB, 484x458px) Image search: [Google]

227KB, 484x458px

>>33560405
I love how you begrudgingly pit Gen 7 in the top 3 just so you could attempt to relate this to BoBo's.

>>33560455
t. hoennigger

>>33560455
It's actually pretty good though, at least in terms of Pokemon designs and concept of a region. Agree that the execution is shit though and OP is trying too hard.

>>33560455
Gen 7's flaws were more surface level rather than fundamental game design like gens 1-3

File: 1505524690505.jpg (35KB, 345x370px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 345x370px

>>33560405
Pokemon:
5>4>6>2>3>7>1

Jojo:
4>5>7>2>6>3>1

>Pokemon
4 > 2 > 3 > 6 > 1

Never played 5 or 7

>Jojo
7 > 4 > 2 > 8 > 6 > 3 > 5 > 1

>>33560567
>judging 8 even though it's only like half over
lol

People actually like JoJo? I thought it was a meme stolen from redditers

>>33560405
>2 that low
anon please

>>33560572
Kill yourself, lard ass

>>33560573
2 was just 1 with better characters

still lacked a good overall plot and stands desu

File: Pvs7w9y.png (1MB, 1440x810px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1440x810px

>>33560572

>>33560405
JoJo sucks!