Games on the switch dont look that great but i would be upset

>>33490329
>GF
>optimizing
Pick one and only one.
It will either look like SM or it will run like shit, or both.

>>33490329
>Games on the switch dont look that great
have you played any games on the switch?

>>33490329
Personally speaking, I won't be disappointed if the game's not open world though I would like them to take cues from Zelda in terms of an overworld and dialogue.

I wouldn't mind seeing trainers and NPCs get expressive or make monosyllabic mannerisms. Beats the hell out of painted on textured expressions.

Also I wouldn't mind a more active camera. If they still wanna do railroading and some kind of narrative, fine but just make the experience feel less like a glorified corridor.

>>33490461
Probably not, lol

>>33490461
which games looks good? he's right most look like shit unless the only games u play are nintendo. so you wouldnt even notice

What i ment was compared to p4 and x1

>>33490522
p4 and x1 games look like piss too senpai

>>33490600
Well the Switch must make you vomit then since it is weaker than the first versions of the PS4 and xbone.

OP here i just worry they will lazy and make SM with no pixels or black lines the swith is okay i guess

File: 1504611928863.png (38KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 625x626px

>>33490501

File: Screenshot_20170906-011413.png (283KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

283KB, 1080x1920px

>>33490687
CEO of Pokemon company recent interview about switch game

Read first 2 points

>>33490699
You can be a fan of Pokemon. And hate Nintendo. There is no correlation between the 2

>>33490708
Honestly my favorite part is the accessories part. I need me some official Pokemon Joy-Cons.

>>33490501
>BotW
>MK8D
>Splatoon 2
>ARMS
>Mario + Rabbids
The rest of the games so far are pretty much 2D indie games that look the same on every platform. But all of the ones listed look fantastic.

File: bb.png (139KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 625x626px

>>33490716

>>33490708
>third point is about making it a partygame
Doesn't sound good so far
>>33490716
That is true but going as far as to say there is no correlation at all when Nintendo owns at least 1/3 of the IP is wrong.

File: doom05.png (105KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 640x480px

Man, I remember when games looked like this. The graphics for the Switch are fucking fine, what you should truly be concerned about is if the game is going to be good or not.

>>33490747
and? there just a publisher. they have no creative control over pokemon. its like saying i have to like warner brothers because they distrubted the dark knight

>>33490632
>weaker
there's that word again

OP never saw the artical been off the web for a bit i just want it to look goods as odssey or botw i dont really care for the next gimmick

>>33490779
also like saying im supposed to be fan of disney because they distrubute 90% marval movies. developer and publisher huge difference

File: 1489911800506.png (676KB, 532x585px) Image search: [Google]

676KB, 532x585px

>>33490786
>>33490779

>>33490779
Are you fucking illiterate? I literally said I agreed that you don't have to like Nintendo if you like Pokémon. What I said was that there is definitely a correlation between the two.

>>33490632
t. /v/irgin who's mom won't buy him a Switch.

>>33490834
You very clearly post on /v/ yourself given how bothered you are by me simply pointing out that the Switch isn't as strong as its contemporaries.

>>33490868
I clearly never said I didn't post on /v/.

>>33491046
Then using /v/irgin as an insult is a bit hypocritical, don't you think?