>we havent had a single dragon cover legend since bw2 >we

>>33419056
Good riddance

>>33419056
>implying cover legends NEED to be dragon type

>>33420036
>implying I ever said that
>implying I wasn't just pointing it out

>>33420036
Way to jump the gun, idiot.

>>33419056
Only 3 out of 7 generations had dragon box art legends, and one of them only had it as a 3rd version legend. It's not as prominent of a meme as you would think it is.

>>33419056
Dragon box legends are stupid and overdone as shit

>>33420067
3 out of 7 is almost half. Pokemon has been around for 20 years so factoring in the timescale of each new gen's release it really is a lot

>>33420067
At the time it was 3/5

>>33420106
I actually hope the gen 8 legends are fire and ice dragons

>>33420119
Hope all you want anon, I highly doubt that will happen. Gamefreak is trying new stuff now. Although I wouldn't rule out a fairy/dragon box legend

>>33420119
you have a reshiram instead

>>33420106
I want a Koi box legend!

>>33420119
No dragon parts. Just fire/ice, and maybe grass/poison. We need a poison legendary. UBs and Arceus aside.

>>33420484
I hope you kill yourself, not only in your trip but also your underage-esque way of typing.
A fish for a box legend would be pretty cool, though.

>>33420067
>one of them only had it as a 3rd version legend
>Rayquaza
>Giratina
>Kyurem
Am I missing something here, or am I getting an F in reading comprehension?

>>33420553
>one of them ONLY had it as a 3rd version
you get an F, see me after class.

>>33420039
>implying I implied you said that