Huh. Guess you could say Digimon took a dip in quality the same time Pokemon has.
Isn't Renamon and company "gen 3" Digimon? I feel like the second and third picture should be swapped, but I guess I don't know enough about Digimon.
>>33411351
you are correct. 2 and 3 should be swapped as well as 4 and 5
but i guess op did this switcheroo so it'd better fit his """""""theory"""""" since tamers (2) is considered by many the best, 02 (3) a shit sequel to a great first iteration, and frontier (5) a weird place where the digimon are the chosen children. haven't watched the others to comment on them
>>33411391
A rational, insightful, and impartial description for each generation? On /vp/? Get that shit out of here
>>33411315
This makes no sense.
>>33411391
Better.
/mon/ when?
>>33411391
I think that early Arc-V was a lot better than XY, or the whole G6 for the matter. Acv-V problem were the overextention of the Synchro Arc, making the side characters worthless, rushed ending and the fucking crossover being the only action field.
>>33411413
>/mon/ when?
This needs to happen. No board should just focus on one franchise. If /m/ exist, why not?
>>33411420
Eh, it would still be 99% percent pokemon and all the franchises would just have a general that would need to be bumped hard to stay up.
>>33411454
Nah, alot of the Yugioh threads on /a/ for one are quite active.