>pokemon rangers general this shit is awesome why dont

Because it's a dead spinoff that made me scratch my DS touchscreen

>>33376271
Fucking this. My DS lite has scars on the bottom screen.

It's dead, sadly. I started a new run through Guardian Signs a while ago but dropped it too fast. I hate how hard it is to finish the multiplayer storyline without friends.

File: 1501523336843.png (83KB, 449x361px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 449x361px

>the only spinoff that will continually get sequels is pmd
IT'S NOT FAIR

File: 312567-i_11720.jpg (99KB, 524x398px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 524x398px

>>33376263
>DS was capable of this quality of graphics/sprites.
>We got pic related instead.
Game Freak is basically indiedev tier when they could easily step up everything with all the money and influence that they have.

>>33376271
>>33376380
is it really this bad?, i wanna see if i can get these to work on my 3DS but the screen is already fucking really scratched, and playing this will probably kill it.

>>33376445
Just get yourself a protector and don't play with a nail. These people were stupid kids pressing their screens too hard.

>>33376445
What >>33376473 said, I'm willing to admit that I was an irresponsible child. I've been meaning to try to sequels anyway, what I played of the first game was fun. Too bad the Switch is probably the final nail in the coffin for Rangers.

>>33376444
Holy fuck this. We could have had a DPPt that looked like Shadows of Almia. We could have had more in depth exploration and methods of finding/catching new pokemon. Mainline games could have been so much fucking more. Gamefreak is so blatantly the opposite of innovative.

>>33376263
/pmdg/ used to be spinoff general but we only ever talked about pmd with a few "rangers/pokepark are nice too" once in a while