Am I the only one who's not entirely convinced this was real? Please don't come telling me the descriptions came after the leak and that this is the only reason people took the leak seriously to begin with. I already know that, I just don't get why no one considers it possible that the faker just randomly guessed one of the starters would be a Grass-type owl with a brown/green pattern. Yes, it's a wild guess, but it's not impossible per se.
I'll honestly never understand why everyone thinks Roothoot is beta Rowlet or whatever. I think it's 100% fake.
>>33199433
I think beliave it was real was a meme, how could a sane like this abomination
fuck off HB we know the truth
>>33199433
I hope not, because otherwise it would mean the whole world would be retarded
Hello friend
>>33199433
It will be real eventually. But not right now. Just sayin
>>33199645
Not sure what you mean by this?
>>33199433
Of course it's fake idiot it looks like Rowlet but drawn by a 5yo
>>33199433
It is 100% fake. Someone was smart enough to take the then-newly leaked Japanese name for Rowlet and a few other clues, then deduce that one of the starters would be a grass owl. Most people with a brain did this. Unfortunately, art must not've been the artist's forte, because they created this abomination. I wonder why it has a gigantic version of Serperior's eyes stuck to its face.
>>33200135
>the then-newly leaked Japanese name for Rowlet
Wait, you actually think the names leaked before the artwork? So, you weren't here when this happened. You just betrayed the fact that you haven't even been browsing /vp/ for a year. Lurk more, newfag.
>>33200271
>for a year
Wew I wish I could stay away from this board for that long.
But nah I was here for that, and I and several others posted pretty much the same thing back then.
Member hopebiscuit won money