>liking a pokemon with any semblance of strength gets you labelled a barafag
Men can't be strong anymore? Fucking numale faggots
>>33038770
It's really just Incineroar that people hate. They're justified though because it's a terrible design. The other alolan starters also have terrible designs desu
>>33038770
>liking a pokemon with any feminine traits gets you labelled a waifufag/pokefucker
>>33038770
>numale
>>33038770
>liking a pokemon that is cute makes you gay
can be applied for the other peoples, so please fuck off.
>>33038770
It's only barafagging if they're actually humanoid. People who say shit like Feraligatr or Swampert are barabait are either baiting or retarded.
>>33038797
t. pokefucker
Liking a Pokemon that's competitively viable gets you labeled as a smogonfag/vgc cuck.
>>33038805
and there you go, point proved. :^)
>>33038799
Good thing the humanoid talk on Incineroar is mostly just /vp/ exaggerating. It's just a cat standing up, get over it.
That they resort to calling it "bara" forgetting actual tigers are strong and fit is just hilarious though.
>>33038799
Half the time I see anyone posting Feraligatr fanart here it's lewd bara shit.
>>33038817
my issue was mostly about those awful sausage fingers
>>33038780
Decidueye and Primarina are passable imo, and Incineroar wouldn't be so bad if A) its proportions and anatomy weren't basically just a mascot costume and B) it hadn't been done to death already, like Jesus.
Primarina is weird because it's so overtly feminine, but it's still a pretty fresh design, and interesting. Not necessarily a favorite, but nothing is particularly wrong with it.
Decidueye is the most decent of the three imo, though I wish it had kept some of the lighter colors of its prevos, and those wings/arms are kind of an issue imo, but they still hold up fine imo and their gimmick is worth it and interesting. Plus it being Grass/Ghost was just really sweet.
>>33038817
I think it's exaggeration to say Incineroar is just a cat standing up. Its anatomy is closest to a cartoon human, pic related.
>>33038799
Oh you poor naive soul
Liking legendaries, especially ones that are from Gen 4+, gets you labeled as underage.
>>33038807
yeah, nah, I can't see people liking garchomp otherwise. it looks like shit
>>33041108
People have different tastes. I know this might seem incredibly shocking to you
>>33041108
Garchomp is CUTE
>>33041108
Garchomp is one of the few Gen 4 Pokemon I like (as in, like a lot) the design of.
>>33041108
I always thought Garchomp looked cool. Especially when I was younger.
>>33039553
Is that the new design for Eggman?
>>33038770
>>33038791
>liking a pokemon with dark colors or an angry/mean look on its face gets you labelled an edgelord
>>33041711
no, this is
>liking a pokemon gets you labelled a manchild