>Pokémon for Switch won't just "take over a year,"

>>32927541
>quarter of a decade

>>32927541
They were supposed to make Sun and Moon amazing 20th anniversary games, and, well, look at how that turned out.

>>32927547
Oops, century.

Also now that I'm looking at the years, they might instead do this:

>2017 -- USUM
>2018
>2019 -- Switch games
>2020
>2021 -- Pokémon RBGY remakes on Switch for 25th anniversary.

>>32927561
Yeah but if they plan better, they won't have to be rushed at all this time, like XY, ORAS, and SM all were. They've got four years.

>>32927541
>quarter of a decade

>>32927592
>I can't read the three posts below the OP
>even if I did, I'd refuse to acknowledge that this issue had been addressed, and would pretend that it wasn't
>I'm just hear to point out your flaws and stir up trouble rather than actually wanting to participate in civil discourse

>>32927541
The anniversary games will be gen 9
2018- Gen 8
2019 or 2020-Dp remakes
2021- Gen 9( anniversary gen like gen 7)

File: 1483511087430.jpg (8KB, 224x224px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 224x224px

>we'd be stuck with USUM for an entire FIVE YEARS because GameFreak wouldn't believe in remaking Sinnoh until Switch since you can still play it on the 3DS
>unless they remake Kanto again because it's currently impossible to play FRLG on a 3DS, and RGBY are dated as fuck, Virtual Console or not
>plus Pokemon from RGBY could receive some kind of bonus akin to transferring a Gen 3 Pokemon all the way to ORAS
>then as a result they could hold off on remakes until their 20th Anniversary instead of 10th Anniversary since the years are catching up too fast, and eventually people will be clamoring for remakes of Gens 5-7 as soon as we hit the Switch due to a lack of Backwards Compatibility
FUCK