>100% acc
>over 70 BP
>over 10 PP
>positive secondary effect
No move should have all 4 of these attributes.
Scald thread?
you will receive your burns and you will enjoy it
>>32879502
Oh, you think scald is bad NOWJust wait until July 7th
>>32879502
Yeah fuck Flamethrower and TBolt!!!
(you)
>Water Pokemon more effective at burning than Fire or Grass Pokemon
Why is Water so powerful? Scald as a move is absurd, but would actually be balanced on a Fire or Grass type.
>>32879536
Lava Plume already exists
>>32879536
>Why is Water so powerful?
This
>>32879545
Less than half of fire types actually get it though
>>32879536
>>32879546
Its Masuda's favorite type.
>>32879527
I know this is bait but I have never, even once seen either Tbot or Flamethrower cause their secondary effects, is it really 10%?
>>32879525
what's july 7th?
>>32879525
DELETE THIS
>>32879569
How is it bait anon? I named two moves that fit OP's criteria. OP is just stupid by lumping those moves in with Scald.
>>32879569
Yeah, it's kinda shitty.
>>32879502
Let me fix it for you:
>>100% acc
>>over 75 BP
>>over 10 PP
>>positive secondary effect with more than 10% chance
>>32879627
Make sure to add
>Not a signature move
>>32879525
What did he mean by this?